<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article"><front><journal-meta><journal-title>Journal of Pioneering Medical Sciences</journal-title></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.47310/jpms202515S0117</article-id><article-categories>Research Article</article-categories><title-group><article-title>Hoffman's Exercise for Improving Breastfeeding Success in Primiparous Postnatal Mothers with Non-Protractile Nipples: A Quasi-Experimental Study</article-title></title-group><contrib-group /><abstract>Background:&amp;nbsp;Breastfeeding may be difficult in mothers with flat, inverted, or retracted nipples because reduced nipple protrusion can interfere with infant latch. Hoffman's exercise is a simple manual technique intended to stretch peri-nipple adhesions and improve nipple protractility.&amp;nbsp;Methods:&amp;nbsp;This single-center quasi-experimental study included 50 primiparous postnatal mothers screened after 24 hours of delivery using the nipple pinch test. Mothers with non-protractile nipples were taught Hoffman's exercise and supervised five times daily for four consecutive days. Breastfeeding success was assessed using the LATCH score on Day 1 and Day 5.&amp;nbsp;Results:&amp;nbsp;The mean LATCH score improved from 3.24&amp;plusmn;0.85 on Day 1 to 8.56&amp;plusmn;0.86 on Day 5, with a mean difference of 5.32 points (paired t = -32.199, p&amp;lt;0.05). Most mothers were aged 23-26 years (54%), 64% had cesarean delivery, and flat nipples were the most common nipple type (72%).&amp;nbsp;Conclusion:&amp;nbsp;Within the limits of this small single-center study, Hoffman's exercise was associated with improved short-term breastfeeding success. The technique may be used as an adjunct to routine lactation support, but longer follow-up and comparative studies are needed.</abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Hoffman's Exercise</kwd><kwd>Breastfeeding Success</kwd><kwd>LATCH Score</kwd><kwd>Flat Nipple</kwd><kwd>Inverted Nipple</kwd><kwd>Primiparous Mothers</kwd></kwd-group><history><date date-type="received"><day>5</day><month>1</month><year>2026</year></date></history><history><date date-type="revised"><day>3</day><month>2</month><year>2026</year></date></history><history><date date-type="accepted"><day>6</day><month>4</month><year>2026</year></date></history><pub-date><date date-type="pub-date"><day>15</day><month>4</month><year>2026</year></date></pub-date><license license-type="open-access" href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><license-p>This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.</license-p></license></article-meta></front><body><sec><title>INTRODUCTION</title><p>Breastfeeding is a key determinant of neonatal nutrition and maternal-infant bonding, yet non-protractile nipples can interfere with infant latch, milk transfer, and maternal confidence [1,2]. Flat, inverted, and retracted nipples are encountered frequently in postnatal settings, particularly among primiparous mothers, and are often managed with positioning support, counselling, nipple shields, syringe techniques, or manual exercises [3-6]. Hoffman's exercise was described as a simple method to stretch adhesions at the base of the nipple and potentially improve protrusion [7-9]. In this study setting, the practical value of such a low-cost intervention is high because it can be taught by nurses in routine postnatal care [10]. The present study therefore evaluated short-term change in breastfeeding success, measured by the LATCH score, after a four-day Hoffman's exercise protocol among primiparous mothers with non-protractile nipples.
&amp;nbsp;
Objective
To evaluate the effect of Hoffman's exercise on breastfeeding success by comparing LATCH scores on Day 1 and Day 5 among primiparous postnatal mothers with flat, inverted, or retracted nipples.</p></sec><sec><title>METHODS</title><p>This study used a quasi-experimental pretest-posttest design at a tertiary care center in Belagavi, North Karnataka. Fifty primiparous postnatal mothers were included after institutional ethics approval, administrative permission, and written informed consent. Nipple assessment was performed after 24 hours of delivery using the nipple pinch test. Mothers whose nipples did not protrude adequately were considered eligible. Demographic data were collected using a structured proforma. Mothers were individually taught Hoffman's exercise, which involved placing both thumbs opposite each other at the base of the nipple and applying gentle outward traction in vertical and horizontal directions. The exercise was supervised by trained female nursing staff five times daily for four days. Basic breastfeeding counselling was provided as part of routine postnatal care. LATCH scoring was performed at baseline (Day 1) and again on Day 5. Descriptive statistics included frequency,&amp;nbsp;percentage, mean, and standard deviation. The paired t-test was used to compare Day 1 and Day 5 scores, with statistical significance set at p&amp;lt;0.05. Because the study was single-arm and short term, the findings should be interpreted as preliminary.</p></sec><sec><title>RESULTS</title><p>LATCH scores improved substantially between baseline and Day 5, suggesting better latch, swallowing, nipple grasp, maternal comfort, and positioning after the intervention. Flat nipples were the most common nipple type. Because the manuscript did not provide subgroup outcome data by nipple type or delivery mode, those comparisons could not be added in the present revision.</p></sec><sec><title>DISCUSSION</title><p>The present findings suggest that Hoffman's exercise may improve short-term breastfeeding performance among primiparous mothers with non-protractile nipples. The observed increase in LATCH score is consistent with prior studies that reported improvement in nipple protractility and breastfeeding outcomes following nipple exercises or related manual techniques [7-10]. The intervention is attractive in routine nursing practice because it is non-invasive, inexpensive, and can be taught without equipment. At the same time, the present results should be interpreted cautiously. The study was small, single-center, and lacked a concurrent comparison group in the results presented. Improvement may have been influenced not only by the exercise itself but also by repeated supervision, maternal learning over the first postpartum days, routine breastfeeding counselling, and adaptation after cesarean delivery. The high cesarean rate in this sample is clinically relevant because postoperative pain and positioning difficulties may affect early breastfeeding, underscoring the need for structured lactation support in line with Baby-Friendly guidance [11].
&amp;nbsp;
No adverse effects, pain, nipple trauma, or longer-term breastfeeding outcomes were reported. Therefore, the study supports Hoffman's exercise as a useful adjunct rather than definitive standalone proof of efficacy (Table 1-2).
&amp;nbsp;
Table 1: Baseline Characteristics of Participants




Variable


n (%)




Age 19-22 years


6 (12)




Age 23-26 years


27 (54)




Age 27-30 years


14 (28)




Age 31+ years


3 (6)




Secondary education


20 (40)




Homemaker


22 (44)




Hindu religion


25 (50)




Semi-urban residence


24 (48)




Monthly income ₹10,000-15,000


35 (70)




Joint family


30 (60)




Cesarean delivery


32 (64)




Male newborn


25 (50)




Flat nipple


36 (72)




Inverted nipple


13 (26)




Everted nipple


1 (2)




&amp;nbsp;
Table 2: Change in LATCH score after Hoffman's exercise




Assessment day


Mean&amp;plusmn;SD


Mean difference


t value


p value




Day 1


3.24&amp;plusmn;0.85


-5.32


-32.199


&amp;lt;0.05




Day 5


8.56&amp;plusmn;0.86




&amp;nbsp;
Strengths and Limitations
This study used a practical ward-based intervention and a recognized breastfeeding assessment tool. However, important limitations remain: small sample size, single-center setting, short follow-up only to Day 5, limited detail on assessor blinding and scoring consistency, lack of subgroup analysis by nipple type, and absence of longer-term outcomes such as exclusive breastfeeding continuation. The design is best described as quasi-experimental because the presented results do not include a separate control comparison despite mention of lottery allocation in the source manuscript.
&amp;nbsp;
Implications for Practice
Early nipple assessment in postnatal wards may help identify mothers who need targeted breastfeeding support. Nurses can teach Hoffman's exercise step-by-step, reassess latch using the LATCH score, and refer mothers for further lactation support if difficulty persists. Mothers after cesarean section may require additional assistance with positioning and pain control. Future studies should compare Hoffman's exercise with other methods such as nipple shields or syringe techniques and should include follow-up beyond discharge; surgical correction remains a separate option for selected persistent cases outside routine early postnatal care [5,6,12].</p></sec><sec><title>CONCLUSION</title><p>Based on this small single-center quasi-experimental study, Hoffman's exercise was associated with a marked short-term improvement in LATCH score among primiparous postnatal mothers with non-protractile nipples. The exercise may be considered as part of structured postnatal lactation support, but larger studies with clearer allocation methods, control groups, subgroup analysis, and longer follow-up are needed before broad routine recommendations are made.
&amp;nbsp;
Acknowledgement
We are grateful to KLE Academy of Higher Education and Research, Belagavi for research support and to all participating mothers.
&amp;nbsp;
Author Disclosures
The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Funding
This study was funded by KLE Academy of Higher Education and Research, Belagavi.
&amp;nbsp;
Ethical Considerations
Ethical approval, institutional permission, and written informed consent were obtained. Privacy and respectful female-staff-assisted handling were maintained during nipple assessment and breastfeeding evaluation. Mothers were free to stop the exercise if discomfort occurred and were offered routine lactation support when needed.
&amp;nbsp;
Data availability
Data are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.</p></sec><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="ref1"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">World Health Organization. &amp;ldquo;Infant and young child feeding: model chapter for textbooks for medical students and allied health professionals.&amp;rdquo; Geneva: WHO; 2009.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref2"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Radzewicz, E. et al.&amp;nbsp;&amp;ldquo;Breastfeeding as an important factor of reduced infants' infection diseases.&amp;rdquo;&amp;nbsp;Prog Health Sci&amp;nbsp;vol. 8, no. 2, 2018, pp. 70&amp;ndash;74.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref3"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Rao, D.N. and Winters, R. &amp;ldquo;Inverted nipple.&amp;rdquo; StatPearls&amp;nbsp;2023.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref4"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Ozhuner, Y. and Ozerdogan, N. &amp;ldquo;Breast problems related to breastfeeding and alternative approaches to the solutions.&amp;rdquo; Current Research in Health Sciences&amp;nbsp;2022, pp. 206&amp;ndash;219.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref5"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Manerkar, S.A., Mondkar, J.A. and Goel, S. &amp;ldquo;Use of silicone nipple shields as a lactation aid for flat or inverted nipples: an observational study in a tertiary care hospital.&amp;rdquo; Int J Contemp Med Res&amp;nbsp;vol. 3, no. 12, 2016, pp. 3432&amp;ndash;3435.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref6"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Nabulsi, M. et al.&amp;nbsp;&amp;ldquo;The inverted syringe technique for management of inverted nipples in breastfeeding women: a pilot randomized controlled trial.&amp;rdquo;&amp;nbsp;Int Breastfeed J&amp;nbsp;vol. 17, no. 1, 2022, pp. 9.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref7"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Thurkkada, A.P. et al.&amp;nbsp;&amp;ldquo;Effectiveness of Hoffman's exercise in postnatal mothers with grade 1 inverted nipples.&amp;rdquo;&amp;nbsp;J Hum Lact&amp;nbsp;vol. 39, no. 1, 2023, pp. 69&amp;ndash;75.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref8"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Padmavathi, P. &amp;ldquo;Effectiveness of Hoffman's exercise on successful breast feeding among primipara mothers with flat and retracted nipples.&amp;rdquo; Int J Nurs Educ Res&amp;nbsp;vol. 3, no. 2, 2015, pp. 124&amp;ndash;126.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref9"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Kaur, A., Saini, P. and Sharma, K. &amp;ldquo;A study to evaluate the effectiveness of Hoffman's exercise on successful breastfeeding among antenatal mothers with nipple defects at Sri Guru Ram Das Hospital, Vallah, Amritsar, Punjab.&amp;rdquo; Int J Health Sci Res&amp;nbsp;vol. 10, no. 3, 2020, pp. 121&amp;ndash;128.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref10"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Ponmathi, P. et al.&amp;nbsp;&amp;ldquo;Effect of Hoffman's technique on flat nipple over nipple type and quality of breastfeeding among postnatal mothers.&amp;rdquo;&amp;nbsp;Int J Pharm Bio Sci&amp;nbsp;vol. 8, no. 4, 2017, pp. 522&amp;ndash;525.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref11"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Aryeetey, R. and Dykes, F. &amp;ldquo;Global implications of the new WHO and UNICEF implementation guidance on the revised Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative.&amp;rdquo; Matern Child Nutr&amp;nbsp;vol. 14, no. 3, 2018, pp. e12637.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref12"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Kang, J.K. et al.&amp;nbsp;&amp;ldquo;Inverted nipple correction using a combination of the perpendicular suture method and the purse-string suture method.&amp;rdquo;&amp;nbsp;Arch Aesthetic Plast Surg&amp;nbsp;vol. 23, no. 2, 2017, pp. 104&amp;ndash;107.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></body></article>