<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article"><front><journal-meta><journal-title>Journal of Pioneering Medical Sciences</journal-title></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.47310/jpms2026150427</article-id><article-categories>Research Article</article-categories><title-group><article-title>Green Synthesis of Cobalt Ferrite (CoFe₂O₄) Nanoparticles Utilising Co-Precipitation, Structural Features and Toxicological Evaluation against MCF-7 and HUVEC Cell Lines</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Abjel</surname><given-names>Abeer Khalefa</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1" /><email>abeer.k.abjel@uodiyala.edu.iq</email></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Mubarak</surname><given-names>Marwa Ismail</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1" /><email>marwa.ismail.mubarak@uodiyala.edu.iq</email></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Ibrahim</surname><given-names>Dheyaa H.</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1" /><email>dheyaa.ibrahim@uodiyala.edu.iq</email></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Razaq</surname><given-names>Waseela Abdul</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1" /><email>dr.waseela.abdulraza@uodiyala.edu.iq</email></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><institution>Department of Chemistry, College of Education for Pure Science, University of Diyala, Diyala, Iraq</institution></aff><abstract>Background:&amp;nbsp;Cobalt ferrite (CoFe₂O₄) nanoparticles were produced using an eco-friendly co-precipitation technique and their morphological, structural and cytotoxic properties were evaluated green synthesis approach to produce these&amp;nbsp; nanoparticles. Methods:&amp;nbsp;Physicochemical investigation was conducted using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), X-ray diffraction (XRD), energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX), scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and atomic force microscopy (AFM). X-ray diffraction (XRD). The cytotoxic activity of the cobalt and iron oxide nanoparticles was evaluated using the MTT assay on human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) and breast cancer cells (MCF-7) after 24 and 48 hours of exposure at doses ranging from (25 - 400 &amp;micro;g/ml).&amp;nbsp;Results:&amp;nbsp;XRD confirmed a single-phase spinel structure with an average crystalline size of 20.17 nm, as estimated by the Debye-Scherer equation. The results showed a clear decrease in cell viability for both species, depending on the concentration and duration of exposure, with a significant reduction in IC50 values ​​after prolonged exposure 147 &amp;micro;g/ml for HUVEC and 257 &amp;micro;g/ml for MCF-7 after 48 hours.&amp;nbsp;Conclusion:&amp;nbsp;These findings provide valuable insights into the biological response to iron oxide and cobalt nanoparticles and highlight the importance of assessing biosafety prior to their use in biomedical applications.</abstract><kwd-group><kwd>CoFe₂O₄ Nanoparticles</kwd><kwd>Green synthesis</kwd><kwd>Cytotoxicity</kwd><kwd>HUVEC</kwd><kwd>MCF-7</kwd></kwd-group><history><date date-type="received"><day>7</day><month>2</month><year>2026</year></date></history><history><date date-type="revised"><day>3</day><month>3</month><year>2026</year></date></history><history><date date-type="accepted"><day>24</day><month>3</month><year>2026</year></date></history><pub-date><date date-type="pub-date"><day>5</day><month>5</month><year>2026</year></date></pub-date><license license-type="open-access" href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><license-p>This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.</license-p></license></article-meta></front><body><sec><title>INTRODUCTION</title><p>Magnetic nanoparticles have garnered a lot of interest due to their unique size-dependent physical and chemical properties as well as their numerous applications in the fields of technology, medicine and the environment [1,2]. Among these materials, spinel ferrites, which have the general formula MFe₂O₄ (where M = Co, Ni, Zn and Mn), are especially intriguing due to their chemical stability, tuneable magnetic behaviour and well-defined crystal structure [3]. Cobalt ferrite can be used in targeted drug delivery and cancer treatment due to its strong crystalline magnetic contrast, mechanical durability and moderate magnetic saturation [4-6]. However, the increasing use of cobalt ferrite nanoparticles has raised concerns about potential adverse effects on cells and the environment. These nanoparticles can interact with biological systems through mechanisms such as oxidative stress, membrane rupture and the release of metal ions, depending on the particle size, the concentration of the surface chemical composition and the duration of exposure [7-9]. While endothelial cells such as HUVEC cells are commonly used to assess the biocompatibility of nanoparticles, breast cancer cell lines such as MCF-7 cells are commonly used to study antiproliferative effects [10,11]. This study used an environmentally friendly co-precipitation method to evaluate the structural, morphological and cytotoxic properties of CoFe₂O₄ nanoparticles for both normal and cancer cell lines under identical experimental conditions.
&amp;nbsp;
Objectives
The main objective of this study is to synthesize and characterize CoFe₂O₄ nanoparticles using an eco-friendly method and to evaluate their cytotoxic effects HUVEC and MCF-7 cell lines.</p></sec><sec><title>METHODS</title><p>Green Synthesis of CoFe₂O₄ Nanoparticles by Co-Precipitation
The green co-precipitation method, an effective and eco-friendly technique for spinel ferrites, was used to create CoFe₂O₄ nanoparticles [12,13]. In summary, 150 mL of deionised water was used to dissolve 1 g of cobalt nitrate hexahydrate (Co (NO₃) ₂&amp;middot;6H₂O) and 1 g of iron nitrate nicotinate (Fe (NO₃)₃&amp;middot;9H₂O) with constant magnetic stirring at 25&amp;deg;C for 20 minutes. One gram of anhydrous citric acid was then added as a chelating agent. Ammonium hydroxide (NH₄OH) was added progressively to the reaction mixture until its pH reached 7.5. Cobalt ferrite nanoparticles were successfully co-precipitated when the mixture was heated to 135 degrees Celsius and a gelatinous precipitate developed.
&amp;nbsp;
Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR)&amp;nbsp;of CoFe2O4
The functional groups and metal-oxygen linkages in the produced CoFe2O4&amp;nbsp;nanoparticles were investigated using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). As illustrated in Figure1, the FTIR spectra of the produced sample were compared to those of Co(NO₃)₂&amp;middot;6H₂O and Fe(NO₃)₃&amp;middot;9H₂O. The Co-O and Fe-O stretching vibrations, which are distinctive characteristics of the spinel ferrite structure, were identified as the cause of the unique absorption bands at roughly 438 cm⁻&amp;sup1; and 542 cm⁻&amp;sup1;, respectively [14]. The stretching vibrations of the C-O and C=O bonds connected to the leftover citric acid are responsible for the extra bands seen at 1384 cm⁻&amp;sup1; and 1596 cm⁻&amp;sup1;, while the stretching vibrations of the O-H bonds are responsible for the broad band about 3417 cm⁻&amp;sup1; [15].
&amp;nbsp;

&amp;nbsp;
Figure 1: FTIR spectra of main salts and CoFe₂O₄ nanoparticles
&amp;nbsp;
X-Ray Diffraction (XRD) of CoFe2O4
As seen in Figure 2, X-ray diffraction analysis was used to examine the crystal structure of the produced CoFe₂O₄ nanoparticles.
&amp;nbsp;

&amp;nbsp;
Figure 2: CoFe2O4 nanoparticles' X-ray diffraction pattern in comparison to ICDD standard data
&amp;nbsp;
The creation of a single-phase spinel structure was confirmed by the close match between the diffraction peaks and the conventional spinel pattern of CoFe₂O₄ (ICDD card No. 22-1086) [16]. The Debye-Scherer equation was used to determine the average crystal size and Table 1 summarises the findings.
&amp;nbsp;
Table 1: The Debye-Scherer equation was used to determine the crystal size of CoFe₂O₄ nanoparticles




Dp Average (nm)


Dp (nm)


FWHM Bsize&amp;nbsp;(&amp;deg;)


Peak position 2&amp;theta; (&amp;deg;)


&amp;lambda; (&amp;Aring;）


K




20.17


8.55


0.984


18.7852


1.54178


0.94




29.15


0.2952


30.4039




14.60


0.5904


31.1387




22.17


0.3936


35.8091




17.78


0.492


36.6179




30.28


0.2952


43.4312




13.03


0.6888


44.5535




31.54


0.2952


53.8078




24.05


0.3936


57.3604




16.15


0.5904


58.8827




24.74


0.3936


62.9773




12.49


0.7872


64.7034




17.66


0.5904


74.4631




&amp;nbsp;
The computed average crystal size of 20.17 nm demonstrated the synthesised material's nanocrystalline nature.
&amp;nbsp;

&amp;nbsp;
Energy - Dispersive X- ray (EDX) Spectroscopy of CoFe2O4
&amp;nbsp;
To ascertain the elemental makeup of the produced nanoparticles, EDX analysis was carried out. With weight percentages of 44.6% and 38.7%, respectively, the EDX spectrum displayed in Figure 3 verified the existence of iron and cobalt as the primary components, demonstrating the exceptional purity of the produced CoFe₂O₄ nanoparticles [17].
&amp;nbsp;

&amp;nbsp;
Figure 3: EDX spectrum showing the elemental composition of CoFe₂O₄ nanoparticles
&amp;nbsp;
Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) of CoFe2O4
The surface morphology of the CoFe₂O₄ nanoparticles was investigated using SEM analysis. The particles were mostly in the nanoscale range, as seen in Figure 4 and partial agglomeration was ascribed to the electrostatic and magnetic interactions that are frequently seen in magnetic nanoparticles [18]. According to SEM scans, the average particle diameter was roughly 55.75 nm.
&amp;nbsp;

&amp;nbsp;
Figure 4: SEM micrographs of CoFe₂O₄ nanoparticles
&amp;nbsp;
Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) of CoFe2O4
The surface topography and roughness of the produced nanoparticles were thoroughly examined using atomic force microscope analysis. The average particle diameter was 124 nm, the average surface roughness (Sa. Roughness) was 178 picometres and the average root-mean-square roughness (Sq. Root mean square) was 471 picometres, according to the AFM data, which are displayed in Figure 5.
&amp;nbsp;

&amp;nbsp;
Figure 5: Atomic Force Microscopy Examination of CoFe₂O₄ Nanoparticles' Surface Topography and Roughness
&amp;nbsp;
Cytotoxicity Assay (MTT Test)
The MTT test, a well-used technique for evaluating cell viability based on mitochondrial metabolic activity, was used to investigate the cytotoxic effects of CoFe₂O₄ nanoparticles [19]. HUVEC and MCF-7 cells were exposed to CoFe₂O₄ nanoparticles at concentrations ranging from 25 to 400 &amp;micro;g/ml for 24 and 48 hours. Each experiment was performed three times and the results were expressed using the mean &amp;plusmn; standard deviation.</p></sec><sec><title>RESULTS AND DISCUSSION</title><p>Cytotoxicity towards HUVEC Cells
After 24 hours of exposure, CoFe₂O₄ nanoparticles showed a concentration-proportional decrease in HUVEC cell viability. Cell viability exceeded 100% at a concentration of 25 &amp;micro;g/ml but decreased to 38.54% at a concentration of 400 &amp;micro;g/ml, as shown in (Table 2, Figure 6).
&amp;nbsp;
Table 2: Toxic effects of CoFe₂O₄ nanoparticles on HUVEC cells after 24 hours.




Concentration


R1%


R2%


R3%


Mean%


SD




0


95.6133


99.06304


105.3237


100


4.922536




25


106.6014


104.1738


104.4293


105.0682


1.33394




50


94.33561


89.99149


91.39694


91.90802


2.216698




100


72.23169


77.08689


80.15333


76.49064


3.994336




200


64.31006


55.87735


59.7104


59.96593


4.222158




400


42.71721


34.15673


38.75639


38.54345


4.28421




&amp;nbsp;

&amp;nbsp;
Figure 6: Cobalt ferrite (CoFe2O4) nanoparticles' 24-hour MTT test on HUVEC
&amp;nbsp;
Statistical analysis revealed a significant difference between concentrations (P &amp;lt; 0.05), with an IC50 value of 221 &amp;micro;g/ml (Figure 7).
&amp;nbsp;

&amp;nbsp;
Figure 7: 24-hour IC50 for cobalt ferrite (CoFe2O4) nanoparticles
&amp;nbsp;
After 48 hours of exposure, a more pronounced cytotoxic effect was observed, with cell viability decreasing to 22.53% at a concentration of 400 &amp;micro;g/ml (Table 3, Figure 8).
&amp;nbsp;
Table 3: Toxic effects of CoFe₂O₄ nanoparticles on HUVEC cells after 48 hours.




r


R1%


R2%


R3%


Mean%


SD




0


101.8288


98.83625


99.335


100


1.603267




25


93.84872


94.47216


98.33749


95.55279


2.431688




50


83.99834


84.24772


87.6143


85.28679


2.01954




100


59.18537


62.55196


56.56692


59.43475


3.000302




200


41.60433


36.6168


37.86368


38.69493


2.595594




400


19.40981


25.27016


22.90108


22.52702


2.948028




&amp;nbsp;

&amp;nbsp;
Figure 8: 48-hour MTT test of cobalt ferrite (CoFe2O4) nanoparticles on HUVEC
&amp;nbsp;
The IC₅₀ value decreased to 147 &amp;micro;g/ml (Figure 9), indicating an increasing cytotoxic response over time.
&amp;nbsp;

&amp;nbsp;
Figure 9: Half-inhibition concentration (IC50) of cobalt ferrite (CoFe2O4) nanoparticles after 48 hours
&amp;nbsp;
Cytotoxicity of MCF-7 Cells
MCF-7 cells exhibited a clear cytotoxic reaction to CoFe₂O₄ nanoparticles, which was influenced by both concentration and duration.
&amp;nbsp;
According to (Table 4 and Figure 10), cell viability dropped to 26.71% at a dose of 400 &amp;micro;g/ml after a 24-hour exposure.
&amp;nbsp;

&amp;nbsp;
Figure 10: Shows a 24-hour MTT test of cobalt ferrite (CoFe2O4) nanoparticles on MCF-7
&amp;nbsp;
After 24 hours, the IC50 for MCF-7 cells was determined to be 294.3 &amp;micro;g/ml (Figure 11).
&amp;nbsp;

&amp;nbsp;
Figure 11: shows the 24-hour IC50 for cobalt ferrite (CoFe2O4) nanoparticles on MCF-7
&amp;nbsp;
Table 4: Shows the harmful effects of CoFe₂O₄ nanoparticles on MCF-7 cells over a 24-hour period.




Concentration


R1%


R2%


R3%


Mean%


SD




0


100.0456


98.93628


101.0317


100.0045


1.048305




25


99.42931


96.71761


98.44324


98.19672


1.372554




50


93.38962


96.4711


97.45717


95.77263


2.121821




100


87.71971


91.91051


89.32208


89.65077


2.114649




200


71.69604


70.58671


73.05189


71.77822


1.234642




400


27.69259


24.48786


27.93911


26.71452


1.925367




&amp;nbsp;
Cell viability dropped to 22.56% at the same concentration after 48 hours of treatment, indicating a more severe cytotoxic effect (Table 5, Figure 12).
&amp;nbsp;

&amp;nbsp;
Figure 12: MTT test of cobalt ferrite (CoFe2O4) nanoparticles on MCF-7 in 48 hours
&amp;nbsp;
After 48 hours, the IC50 value dropped to 257.6 &amp;micro;g/ml (Figure 13), suggesting a growing cytotoxic effect. Overall, the findings demonstrate that MCF-7 cells were more sensitive to CoFe₂O₄ nanoparticles than HUVEC cells, suggesting that under equal experimental settings, cancer cells and normal cells respond differently.
&amp;nbsp;

&amp;nbsp;
Figure 13: shows the IC50 of cobalt ferrite (CoFe2O4) nanoparticles on MCF-7 after 48 hours
&amp;nbsp;
Table 5: Shows the harmful effects of CoFe₂O₄ nanoparticles on MCF-7 cells over a period of 48 hours.




Concentration


R1%


R2%


R3%


Mean%


SD




0


98.81302


103.4969


96.96413


99.758


3.367324




25


93.1431


95.23851


100.0456


96.14241


3.538914




50


91.0477


93.26636


92.03377


92.11595


1.111611




100


89.32208


84.1452


85.99408


86.48712


2.623419




200


67.25872


68.61457


71.8193


69.23086


2.34192




400


20.42031


22.51572


24.73438


22.5568


2.157325



</p></sec><sec><title>CONCLUSIONS</title><p>An environmentally acceptable co-precipitation approach was used to synthesize and systematically characterize cobalt-iron oxide (CoFe₂O₄) nanoparticles. While cytotoxicity experiments showed concentration- and time-dependent effects on both HUVEC and MCF-7 cell lines, structural investigations verified the creation of a crystalline nano-spinel phase. These results provide a strong experimental basis for further research on cobalt ferrite nanoparticles with a focus on their biosafety and potential biological applications.</p></sec><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="ref1"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Laurent, S. et al.&amp;nbsp;&amp;ldquo;Magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles: synthesis, stabilization, vectorization, physicochemical characterizations and biological applications.&amp;rdquo;&amp;nbsp;Chemical Reviews, vol. 108, 2008, pp. 2064-2110. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr068445e.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref2"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Thanh, N.T.K. and L.A.W. Green. &amp;ldquo;Functionalisation of nanoparticles for biomedical applications.&amp;rdquo; Nano Today, vol. 5, 2010, pp. 213-230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nantod.2010.05.003.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref3"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Goldman, A. Modern Ferrite Technology. 2nd ed., Springer, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-29413-1_5.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref4"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Cullity, B.D. and C.D. Graham. Introduction to Magnetic Materials. 2nd ed., Wiley, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref5"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Pankhurst, Q.A. et al.&amp;nbsp;&amp;ldquo;Applications of magnetic nanoparticles in biomedicine.&amp;rdquo;&amp;nbsp;Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, vol. 36, 2003, pp. R167-R181. https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/36/13/201.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref6"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Reddy, L.H. et al.&amp;nbsp;&amp;ldquo;Magnetic nanoparticles: design and characterization, toxicity and biocompatibility.&amp;rdquo;&amp;nbsp;Journal of Controlled Release, vol. 164, 2012, pp. 45-55. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr300068p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref7"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Nel, A. et al.&amp;nbsp;&amp;ldquo;Toxic potential of materials at the nanolevel.&amp;rdquo;&amp;nbsp;Science, vol. 311, 2006, pp. 622-627. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1114397.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref8"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Oberd&amp;ouml;rster, G. et al.&amp;nbsp;&amp;ldquo;Nanotoxicology: an emerging discipline.&amp;rdquo;&amp;nbsp;Environmental Health Perspectives, vol. 113, 2005, pp. 823-839. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.7339.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref9"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Fadeel, B. and A.E. Garcia-Bennett. &amp;ldquo;Better safe than sorry: understanding the toxicological properties of inorganic nanoparticles.&amp;rdquo; Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, vol. 62, 2010, pp. 362-374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2009.11.008.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref10"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Freshney, R.I. Culture of Animal Cells. 7th ed., Wiley, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref11"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Comşa, Ş.&amp;nbsp;et al. &amp;ldquo;The story of MCF-7 breast cancer cell line.&amp;rdquo;&amp;nbsp;Clujul Medical, vol. 88, 2015, pp. 265-271.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref12"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Kumar, S. et al.&amp;nbsp;&amp;ldquo;Structural, magnetic and electrical properties of CoFe₂O₄ nanostructures synthesized using microwave-assisted hydrothermal method.&amp;rdquo;&amp;nbsp;Materials, vol. 15, no. 22, 2022, pp. 7955. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15227955.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref13"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Giri, J. et al.&amp;nbsp;&amp;ldquo;Synthesis and characterization of ferrite nanoparticles.&amp;rdquo;&amp;nbsp;Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, vol. 293, 2005, pp. 62-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2005.01.044.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref14"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Waldron, R.D. &amp;ldquo;Infrared spectra of ferrites.&amp;rdquo; Physical Review, vol. 99, 1955, pp. 1727-1735. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.99.1727.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref15"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Sugimoto, M. &amp;ldquo;The past, present and future of ferrites.&amp;rdquo; Journal of the American Ceramic Society, vol. 82, 1999, pp. 269-280. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-2916.1999.tb20058.x.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref16"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Cullity, B.D. Elements of X-Ray Diffraction. Addison-Wesley, 1978. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3060306.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref17"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Goldstein, J. et al.&amp;nbsp;Scanning Electron Microscopy and X-Ray Microanalysis. Springer, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-6676-9.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref18"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Tartaj, P. et al.&amp;nbsp;&amp;ldquo;The preparation of magnetic nanoparticles for applications in biomedicine.&amp;rdquo;&amp;nbsp;Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, vol. 36, 2003, pp. R182-R197.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref19"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Mosmann, T. &amp;ldquo;Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival.&amp;rdquo; Journal of Immunological Methods, vol. 65, 1983, pp. 55-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1759(83)90303-4.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></body></article>