<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article"><front><journal-meta><journal-title>Journal of Pioneering Medical Sciences</journal-title></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.61091/jpms202312412</article-id><article-categories>Research Article</article-categories><title-group><article-title>Fatigue Level and Contributing Factors Among Cancer Patients Receiving Chemotherapy</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Hussein</surname><given-names>Dhiaa Alrahman</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1" /></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Sameen</surname><given-names>Faisal Younus</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2" /></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><institution>Fundamental of Nursing Department</institution><institution>University of Kirkuk</institution><city>College of Nursing</city><city>Iraq.</city></aff><aff id="aff2"><institution>Adult Nursing Department</institution><institution>University of Kirkuk</institution><city>College of Nursing</city><city>Iraq.</city></aff><abstract>Background: cancer disease and its treatment are leading cause to fatigue, fatigue is subjective data experienced by cancer patients measured in various method in order to assisting patient to regain daily activity, restore strength, and to improve quality of life. Aim of the study: the current study aimed to assess fatigue level and contributing factors among cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. Methods and materials: A quantitative design cross-sectional study conducted to assess level of fatigue and contributing factors among cancer patients receiving chemotherapy at oncology and hematology center in Kirkuk city from period of July to December 2023, sampling method was purposive sampling consist of 184 patients diagnosed with cancer and prescribed chemotherapy as a treatment. A constructed questionnaire was adopted to achieve the objective of the study consist of four parts; part one demographic data (7 items), part two health status (7 items), fatigue level scale (11 items) which scaled with (always, sometime, and never), and part four contributing factors (9 items). Data collected by interview techniques with the patients after obtaining consent to participate in the current study. Results: The study concluded that the highest age group were 61 years and more, female, the majority having chronic diseases such as diabetes mellitus and heart disease, smokers, most of samples were diagnosed with breast cancer, almost all of cancer patients receiving chemotherapy three times per month intravenously. Regarding fatigue level, the majority of cancer patients in the current study were moderate and sever fatigue level. Concerning the most contributing factors that rises the fatigue among cancer patients were depression, lack of appetite, insomnia, anxiety, sexual dysfunction, and pain respectively. Conclusions: the majority of cancer patients in the current study were moderate and sever fatigue level. the most contributing factors that rises the fatigue among cancer patients were depression, lack of appetite, insomnia, anxiety, sexual dysfunction, and pain respectively.</abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Fatigue; Contributing factors; Cancer; Chemotherapy</kwd></kwd-group><history><date date-type="received"><day>17</day><month>7</month><year>2023</year></date></history><history><date date-type="accepted"><day>23</day><month>12</month><year>2023</year></date></history><pub-date><date date-type="pub-date"><day>29</day><month>12</month><year>2023</year></date></pub-date><license license-type="open-access" href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><license-p>This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.</license-p></license></article-meta></front><body><sec><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Cancer disease and its treatment are the leading cause of fatigue; fatigue is subjective data experienced by cancer patients measured in various methods in order to assist patients in regaining daily activity, restoring strength, accepting cancer treatment, including chemotherapy, and improving their quality of life [1]. According to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, fatigue is defined as "A distressing persistent, subjective sense of physical, emotional and/or cognitive tiredness or exhaustion related to cancer or cancer treatment" [2]. Fatigue is a subjective symptom experienced by patients with cancerous disease undergoing chemotherapy [3].
To assess fatigue among cancer patients, physicians and nurses need to understand patients' feelings of tiredness, weakness and decreased usual activities of daily living [4]. Fatigue differs by its intensity and continuity. Fatigue affects more than half of patients with cancer; over two-thirds of these patients describe fatigue as severe for months, and other cancer patients described as continuous for many years after treatment [5], multifactorial affect fatigue such as the presence of pain, sexual disturbance, psychological depression, and lack of appetite, Bower [6] stated that fatigue influenced by different demographic, physical, psychosocial, behavioral and biological factors. A variety of mechanisms contribute to fatigue development.</p></sec><sec><title>2. Objectives of the Study</title><p>1) Assess fatigue level among cancer patients.2) Determining contributing factors for fatigue.3) Association between fatigue level and demographical and clinical data.</p></sec><sec><title>3. Methods and Materials</title><p>1) Design of the study: The design carried out for the study was cross-sectional design using quantitative research approach from the period July- December 2023. To assess fatigue level and contributing factors among patients with cancer diseases who receiving chemotherapy.
2) Study Sample: Purposive sample (non-probability sampling) was used to select patients diagnosed with cancer, both male and female patients.
3) Population of the Study: The target population were patients diagnosed with cancer and receiving chemotherapy Scheduled by oncologist. The accessible population were 184 patients included in the study.
4) Setting of the Study: All samples included in the study were from oncology and hematology center in Kirkuk city.
5) Tools: Tools that used in the current study consist of four parts; part one demographical data which consist of seven items. Part two health status include six items. Part three fatigue level consist of eleven items related to patients&amp;rsquo; experience of fatigue scaled (always, sometime, and never). Part four contributing factor to fatigue include nine items.
6) Data Collection Procedure: Data were collected by interview technique from period 15th July to 20th August 2023. Informal consent to agree and participate in the study were obtained from the patient. Approximately 20-30 minutes was spent to complete the interview with the sample.
7) Data Analysis: Data coded and analyzed by using statistical package of social science version 26 to analyze descriptive and inferential statistic.</p></sec><sec><title>4. Results</title><p>Table 1 shows that the majority of study sample were age group 61 years and more (47.7%), female (56%), married (40.8%), most samples were primary (28.3%) and intermediate school (23.4), most patients were jobless and retired, 52% were not sufficient economic status, and most of them (68.5%) were urban residency.
Table 1: Distribution of Demographic Data of the Study Sample N=184


No.
items
F.
%


1
Age
Less than 45 years
31
16.9


&amp;nbsp;
&amp;nbsp;
45-60 years
67
36.4


&amp;nbsp;
&amp;nbsp;
61 year and more
86
46.7


&amp;nbsp;
&amp;nbsp;
total
184
100


2
gender
Male
81
44


&amp;nbsp;
&amp;nbsp;
Female
103
56


&amp;nbsp;
&amp;nbsp;
total
184
100


3
Marital status
Single
22
12


&amp;nbsp;
&amp;nbsp;
Married
75
40.8


&amp;nbsp;
&amp;nbsp;
Divorce
36
19.5


&amp;nbsp;
&amp;nbsp;
Widow
51
27.7


&amp;nbsp;
&amp;nbsp;
total
184
100


4
Educational level
Not read and write
18
9.8


&amp;nbsp;
&amp;nbsp;
Read and write
23
12.5


&amp;nbsp;
&amp;nbsp;
Primary school
52
28.2


&amp;nbsp;
&amp;nbsp;
Preliminary school
43
23.4


&amp;nbsp;
&amp;nbsp;
Institute degree
28
15.2


&amp;nbsp;
&amp;nbsp;
College degree
20
10.9


&amp;nbsp;
&amp;nbsp;
total
184
100


5
occupation
Housewife
30
16.3


&amp;nbsp;
&amp;nbsp;
Employee
25
13.6


&amp;nbsp;
&amp;nbsp;
Free work
9
4.9


&amp;nbsp;
&amp;nbsp;
Retired
59
32.1


&amp;nbsp;
&amp;nbsp;
jobless
61
33.1


&amp;nbsp;
&amp;nbsp;
total
184
100


6
Economic status
sufficient
13
7.1


&amp;nbsp;
&amp;nbsp;
Barely sufficient
75
40.8


&amp;nbsp;
&amp;nbsp;
Not sufficient
96
52.1


&amp;nbsp;
&amp;nbsp;
total
184
100


7
Residence
Urban
126
68.5


&amp;nbsp;
&amp;nbsp;
Rural
58
31.5


&amp;nbsp;
&amp;nbsp;
total
184
100



Table 2 demonstrate the health status of the patients, the majority of them having chronic medical diseases (89.7%), most of chronic diseases were diabetes mellitus and heart disease, 63% were smokers, 51% of cancer were breast cancer, almost all of cancer patients receiving chemotherapy three times per month intravenously.
Table 2: Health Status of the Study Sample N=184


No.
items
F.
%


1
Presence of chronic disease
Present
165
89.7


&amp;nbsp;
&amp;nbsp;
not presents
19
10.3


&amp;nbsp;
&amp;nbsp;
total
184
100


2
Type of chronic disease
No chronic disease
19
10.3


&amp;nbsp;
&amp;nbsp;
Heart disease
51
27.7


&amp;nbsp;
&amp;nbsp;
Diabetes mellitus
56
30.4


&amp;nbsp;
&amp;nbsp;
Renal disease
25
13.6


&amp;nbsp;
&amp;nbsp;
Respiratory disease
20
10.9


&amp;nbsp;
&amp;nbsp;
Arthritis
13
7.1


&amp;nbsp;
&amp;nbsp;
total
184
100


3
Smoking
Yes
117
63.6


&amp;nbsp;
&amp;nbsp;
No
67
36.4


&amp;nbsp;
&amp;nbsp;
Total
184
100


4
Alcohol consumption
Yes
36
19.6


&amp;nbsp;
&amp;nbsp;
No
148
80.4


&amp;nbsp;
&amp;nbsp;
Total
184
100


5
Type of cancer (cancer site)
Breast cancer
94
51


&amp;nbsp;
&amp;nbsp;
Prostate cancer
28
15.2


&amp;nbsp;
&amp;nbsp;
Colon cancer
15
8.2


&amp;nbsp;
&amp;nbsp;
Lung cancer
18
9.8


&amp;nbsp;
&amp;nbsp;
Gastric cancer
15
8.2


&amp;nbsp;
&amp;nbsp;
Uterine cancer
9
4.9


&amp;nbsp;
&amp;nbsp;
Bladder cancer
5
2.7


&amp;nbsp;
&amp;nbsp;
Total
184
100


6
How many times have you received chemotherapy per month
Three times
165
89.7


&amp;nbsp;
&amp;nbsp;
Four times and more
19
10.3


&amp;nbsp;
&amp;nbsp;
Total
184
100


7
Chemotherapy delivery methods
Orally
28
15.2


&amp;nbsp;
&amp;nbsp;
Intravenously
156
84.8


&amp;nbsp;
&amp;nbsp;
total
184
100



Table 3 the finding demonstrates that the association between fatigue level and (age, marital status, educational level, and economic status) was significant, whereas the association between fatigue level and (gender, occupation, and residency) was not significant at P-value (&amp;le; 0.05).
Table 3: Association between Fatigue Level and Demographic Data of the Cancer Patients


No.
Items
Total
Calculated Chi-square
Tabulated chi-square
Df.
Sig.


1
Age
184
10.57
9.48
4
S


2
Gender
184
5.39
5.99
2
NS


3
Marital status
184
14.17
12.59
6
S


4
Educational level
184
25.04
18.3
10
S


5
Occupation
184
14.71
15.5
8
NS


6
Economic status
184
19.76
9.48
4
HS


7
Residency
184
2.64
5.99
2
NS


Df.= degree of freedom. NS= not significant. S= significant. HS= highly significant



Table 4 the finding revealed that the association between fatigue level and (chronic disease, type of chronic disease, and chemotherapy delivery method) was significant, whereas the association between fatigue level and (smoking, alcohol consumption, site of cancer, and times receiving chemotherapy) was not significant at P-value (&amp;le; 0.05).
Table 4: Association between Fatigue Level and Health Status of the Cancer Patients


No.
Items
Total
Calculated chi-square
Tabulated chi-square
Df.
Sig.


1
Presence of chronic diseases
184
21.63
5.99
2
HS


2
Type of chronic diseases
184
24.54
18.3
10
S


3
Smoking
184
4.13
5.99
2
NS


4
Alcohol consumption
184
1.75
5.99
2
NS


5
Type of cancer disease (site of cancer)
184
17.95
21.02
12
NS


6
Times Received Chemotherapy per month
184
2.84
5.99
2
NS


7
Chemotherapy Delivery Methods
184
17.24
5.99
2
HS


Df.= degree of freedom. NS= not significant. S= significant. HS= highly significant


</p></sec><sec><title>5. Discussion</title><p>The current study shows the distribution of demographic factors among a sample of 184 people, including age, gender, marital status, educational level, occupation, economic status, and residence. Regarding age, the majority of the sample is over 61 years old. In terms of gender, more than half of the participants were female. Regarding marital status, most participants are married, followed by widows.
Regarding educational level, the largest group has completed primary school, followed by preliminary school. In terms of occupation, over one-third of participants are jobless, followed closely by retired participants.
More than half of the samples needed to be more economically insufficient, then barely sufficient. Finally, there is a notable difference in residence, with the majority living in urban areas and a smaller portion in rural areas. Overall, this study is similar to [1].
These studies found that most study samples were females aged (58-69) years, and most of them were housewives with low educational levels. Chemotherapy is one of the most antitumor agents used systemically to cure, control, or palliative cancer disease; fatigue severity rises as cancer disease progresses and by using chemotherapy [7]. The outcome of the present study related to the level of fatigue show (22\%) of cancer patients receiving chemotherapy experienced severe fatigue levels (Figure 1), highlighting the significant impact of chemotherapy on a patient's quality of life. Notably, most patients reported moderate levels of fatigue, suggesting that the symptom is prevalent and ongoing for many chemotherapy patients. Figure 2 also found that a few patients reported mild fatigue levels, emphasizing that even a low level of fatigue can hurt patient well-being. Several other studies have also examined fatigue's prevalence and contributing factors among cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. Our results agree with a study by Guru et al. [8] and Lingerew et al. [9]. Muhe-Aldeen et al. [10] support the finding, which indicates that most study samples were diagnosed with breast cancer and prostate cancer.
Figure 1: Level of fatigue 1 for overall study samplesFigure 2: Percentage of contributing factors to fatigue of the samples
The study found that most of the participants felt depressed, which was among the most significant contributory factors to fatigue. Cancer patients have to deal with the possibility of death, physical limitations, and constant medical interventions, which could contribute to feelings of helplessness, hopelessness, and a sense of loss. The study also found that more than two-thirds of the participants experienced a lack of appetite, leading to increased fatigue. Chemotherapy can impact a patient's sense of taste, making food unappealing, which reduces calorie intake. Reducing calorie intake leads to fatigue, weakness, and loss of muscle mass. Another factor reported by cancer patients that contributed to fatigue was insomnia, which could be attributed to the psychological distress associated with the cancer diagnosis. Finally, the study found that the anxiety of the participants was also a contributing factor to the high levels of fatigue experienced by cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. Our results agree with studies conducted by Bower [6]. Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy is considered a common symptoms that lead to fatigue [11].
The finding demonstrates that the association between fatigue level and (age, marital status, educational level, and economic status) was significant. In contrast, the association between fatigue level and (gender, occupation, and residency) was not significant at P-value &amp;gt; 0.05). Also the finding revealed that the association between fatigue level and (chronic disease, type of chronic disease, and chemotherapy delivery method) was significant. In contrast, the association between fatigue level and (smoking, alcohol consumption, site of cancer, and times receiving chemotherapy) was not significant at P-value (&amp;gt; 0.05). Our findings align with research conducted by Abu Obead et al. [12].
Early detection and cancer screening strategies are essential for cancer patients and improve managing fatigue and its contributing factors. As mentioned by Majeed and Atiyah [13] about early detection of prostate cancer.
Overall, the current study's findings support the need for ongoing research into the causes and treatment of chemotherapy-related fatigue. Effective symptom management strategies can significantly improve patients' quality of life and treatment outcomes.</p></sec><sec><title>6. Conclusions</title><p>The study concluded that the highest age group was 61 years and more, female, the majority having chronic diseases such as diabetes mellitus and heart disease, smokers, most of the samples were diagnosed with breast cancer, almost all cancer patients received chemotherapy three times per month intravenously. Regarding fatigue levels, most cancer patients in the current study had moderate and severe fatigue levels. The most contributing factors that raise fatigue among cancer patients are depression, lack of appetite, insomnia, anxiety, sexual dysfunction, and pain respectively.</p></sec><sec><title>Conflict of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflict of interests. All authors read and approved final version of the paper.</p></sec><sec><title>Authors Contribution</title><p>All authors contributed equally in this paper.</p></sec><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="ref1"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Saad, W. I., &amp;amp; Aljabari, S. (2019). Fatigue experience among cancer patients toward treatment acceptance: An observational study. Indian Journal of Public Health Research &amp;amp; Development, 10(10), 3926-3931. [Google Scholor]</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref2"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">National Comprehensive Cancer Network. (2013). NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: cancer-related fatigue v.1.2013. Retrieved from [Linl]</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref3"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Borneman, T., Piper, B. F., Koczywas, M., Munevar, C. M., Sun, V., Uman, G. C., &amp;amp; Ferrell, B. R. (2012). A qualitative analysis of cancer-related fatigue in ambulatory oncology. Clinical Journal of Oncology Nursing, 16(1), E26-E32. [Google Scholor]</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref4"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Nowicki, A., Piekarska, J., &amp;amp; Fabricka, E. (2017). The assessment of cancer-related fatigue syndrome in patients with lung cancer during palliative chemotherapy. Advances in Respiratory Medicine, 85(2), 69-76. [Google Scholor]</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref5"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Fabi, A., Falcicchio, C., Giannarelli, D., Maggi, G., Cognetti, F., &amp;amp; Pugliese, P. (2017). The course of cancer related fatigue up to ten years in early breast cancer patients: what impact in clinical practice?. The Breast, 34, 44-52.[Google Scholor]</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref6"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Bower, J. E. (2014). Cancer-related fatigue mechanisms risk factors, and treatments. Nature Reviews: Clinical Oncology, 11(10), 597-609. [Google Scholor]</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref7"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Karthikeyan, G., Jumnani, D., Prabhu, R., Manoor, U. K., &amp;amp; Supe, S. S. (2012). Prevalence of fatigue among cancer patients receiving various anticancer therapies and its impact on quality of life: a cross-sectional study. Indian Journal of Palliative Care, 18(3), 165-175. [Google Scholor]</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref8"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Guru, K., Divita, J., Rama, P., Manoor, U. K., &amp;amp; Supe, S. S. (2012). Prevalence of fatigue among cancer patients receiving various anticancer therapies and its impact on quality of life: A cross-sectional study. Indian Journal of Palliative Care, 18(3), 165-175. [Google Scholor]</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref9"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Lingerew, A., Teshager, W. A., Destaw, E., &amp;amp; Dejen, T. (2023). Fatigue and associated factors among adult cancer patients receiving cancer treatment at oncology unit in Amhara region, Ethiopia. Plos One, 18(1), e0279628. [Google Scholor]</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref10"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Muhe-Aldeen, A., Shakoor, J., &amp;amp; Yaseen, D. (2019). Post-traumatic stress disorders among cancer patients in Kirkuk city. Indian Journal of Public Health Research &amp;amp; Development, 10(2), 951-957. [Google Scholor]</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref11"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Mohammed, H. A., Kumait, A. S., Shakoor, J. A., &amp;amp; Othman, P. N. (2021). Oncology nursing staff knowledge and practice behaviors toward chemotherapy impact on peripheral neuropathy: A study from North of Iraq. Bahrain Medical Bulletin, 43(4), 715-719.[Google Scholor]</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref12"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Abu Obead, K., Yaser, S., Khattab, M., Al-Badainah, F., Saqer, L., &amp;amp; Al-Dosouqi, N. (2014). Chemotherapy-induced fatigue among Jordanian cancer patients: What are the contributing factors. Middle East Journal of Cancer, 5(2), 75-82.[Google Scholor]</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref13"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Majeed, H. M., &amp;amp; Atiyah, H. H. (2021). Effectiveness of an educational program on employees' knowledge concerning contributing factors and early detection for prostate cancer in Baghdad University Colleges in Bab-Almudam. Pakistan Journal of Medical &amp;amp; Health Sciences, 15(3), 794-798.[Google Scholor]</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></body></article>