Journal of Pioneering Medical Scienceshttps://doi.org/10.47310/jpms2025141012Research ArticleMetabolic Syndrome and Thyroid Disease SpectrumN. MawludAbdulrahmanabdulrahmannmdr@gmail.comAhmedYousif B.You_xati@yahoo.comMansourAbbas A.abbas.mansour@fdemc.iqY. HameedShaheenshaheenbibani10@gmail.comErbil Health Directorate, Erbil, Iraq and Department of Endocrinology, Medical College, Internal Medicine Board, Hawler Medical University, Erbil Health Directorate, Hiwa City, 120 m, 44001, Erbil, IraqErbil Health Directorate, Hawler Medical University, Erbil, IraqFaiha Specialized Diabetes, Endocrine and Metabolism Center, University of Basrah, Basrah, IraqErbil Health Directorate, Erbil, IraqBackground: Metabolic syndrome is a group of abnormalities that in conjunction, substantially increase the risk of developing cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes. Thyroid disorders are often faced in clinical practice affecting up to 10% of older adults and, consequently, have been linked to several adverse health outcomes, including increased risk of cardiovascular events, both in their subclinical and overt condition. Despite this significance, limited data exists regarding the prevalence and characteristics of thyroid dysfunction and structure among Iraqi patients with metabolic syndrome. Aim of Study: To investigate structural (by ultrasound) and functional thyroid abnormalities in individuals diagnosed with metabolic syndrome. Method: The case-control study was conducted at Rizgary Teaching Hospital from June 2024 to January 2025. The study included 50 patients who meet the criteria for metabolic syndrome, defined according to the International Diabetes Federation (IDF) criteria, an additional 50 age- and sex-matched controls without metabolic syndrome were included. Thyroid function tests and thyroid ultrasounds were performed for the participants. Result: The statistical analysis yielded a p-value of 0.008, indicating a significant association between thyroid status and the presence of metabolic syndrome. The difference in triglyceride levels across thyroid dysfunction groups was statistically significant (p = 0.02). There is a statistically significant association between thyroid nodules and metabolic syndrome, p<0.05. Conclusion: There is a higher prevalence of both structural and functional thyroid dysfunction among metabolic syndrome patients. The serum level of triglyceride was higher in hypothyroidism patients. These findings emphasize the significance of routine thyroid evaluation in the management of metabolic syndrome to optimize cardiovascular risk and detect thyroid disease in its early stages.Metabolic SyndromeThyroid FunctionHypothyroidismObesity226202529202510920255112025This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.INTRODUCTION

Non-communicable diseases remain the leading cause of mortality worldwide, accounting for more than 41 million deaths annually, surpassing all other causes combined [1,2]. Among them diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular disease arose as major contributors which share multiple modifiable risk factors such as poor dietary choices, obesity, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and physical inactivity [2].   Metabolic syndrome is a cluster of inter-linked metabolic abnormalities, which collectively increase the risk of cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes [3,4]. Central abdominal obesity, elevated triglycerides, reduced high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), hypertension, and impaired glucose represent some of these metabolic abnormalities [5,6]. Currently, it is estimated that one quarter of the world’s population is affected by metabolic syndrome, largely driven by the increasing rates of obesity [7,8]. According to the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III), metabolic syndrome was present in 5% of individuals with normal weight, 22% of those who were overweight and 60% of individuals who were obese [9].   Beyond the established cardiovascular risks, metabolic syndrome has also been linked to disturbances in several endocrine pathways [10-12]. One such condition is thyroid dysfunction, which is among the most common endocrine disorders, affecting up to 10% of adults worldwide [13,14]. Thyroid hormones play a vital role in glucose and metabolism, as well as energy expenditure regulation [15]. Disturbances in the delicate balance maintained by these hormones, whether overt or subclinical, can influence body weight, blood pressure, and lipid profiles-many of the key components of metabolic syndrome [16]. Several studies have observed a higher rate of functional and structural thyroid abnormalities among individuals with metabolic syndrome, hinting at a potentially bidirectional relationship [17,18]. To that end, insulin resistance has been linked to thyroid tissue changes and thyroid dysfunction has been found to worsen pre-existing metabolic derangements [19,20]. However, the strength of this association remains in doubt due to the inconsistencies across populations [21].   As such, we hypothesized that patients with metabolic syndrome have a higher prevalence of both functional and structural thyroid anomalies. In Iraq, where obesity and cardiovascular disease continue to be a burden, there is a lack of sufficient data regarding thyroid dysfunction in patients with metabolic syndrome. Exploring this relationship could prove to be essential in developing early detection and management strategies.   Aim of the Study The study aims investigate thyroid structure and functional abnormalities in individuals diagnosed with metabolic syndrome.   Objectives of the Study   To evaluate serum levels of thyroid function markers (TSH, Free T4, and Free T3) in patients with metabolic syndrome and compare them with a control group To examine the association between individual components of metabolic syndrome (abdominal obesity, high triglycerides, low HDL cholesterol, elevated blood pressure, and high fasting glucose) and thyroid function parameters To assess the prevalence of structural thyroid abnormalities (e.g., nodules on ultrasound) in patients with metabolic syndrome compared with controls To assess the influence of lifestyle and clinical factors (such as smoking, medication use, and prior thyroid disease) on thyroid function and structure in patients with metabolic syndrome To compare baseline demographic and clinical characteristics between the metabolic syndrome group and the control group   Rationale Based on the fact that thyroid abnormalities are common in this locality and due to possible associations with metabolic syndrome as well as limited and infrequent studies have been performed in researchers’ area, all provided the researchers the motivation to carry out his work.

METHODS

Study Design This study is a cross-sectional study designed to investigate the structural and functional abnormalities of the thyroid gland in individuals diagnosed with metabolic syndrome. This design allows for assessing the relationship between metabolic syndrome and thyroid dysfunction at a single point in time.   Study Setting The study was conducted at Rizgary Teaching Hospital, a tertiary care facility which is located in Erbil, Iraq. The data collection is scheduled from Jun 2024, to January 2025.   Participants Inclusion Criteria: The study included 50 patients who meet the criteria for metabolic syndrome, defined according to the International Diabetes Federation (IDF) criteria, which require the presence of at least three of the following components and they are as follow:   Abdominal Obesity: Waist measurements exceeding 102 cm for males and 88 cm for females Triglycerides Increased: Triglyceride levels in the serum are at least 150 mg/dL, or receiving drug therapy for hypertriglyceridemia Decreased HDL Cholesterol: For men, HDL cholesterol is below 40 mg/dL, and for women, it is below 50 mg/dL, or receiving drug therapy for low HDL High Blood Pressure: Systolic blood pressure is 130 mmHg or higher, or diastolic blood pressure is 85 mmHg or higher Elevated Fasting Glucose: Fasting plasma glucose levels equal to or greater than 100 mg/dL, or receiving drug therapy for hyperglycemia   Exclusion Criteria Patients were excluded from the study if they had:   Chronic liver disease Chronic kidney disease Congestive heart failure Pregnant ladies Women using oral contraceptives pills, glucocorticoids, amiodarone and lithium, that may affect thyroid function tests   An additional 50 individuals without any criteria for metabolic syndrome were included as a control group. This group were served as a baseline for the comparison of thyroid function and structure. Controls were selected from individuals attending hospital for routine health checks who did not meet the criteria of metabolic syndrome. Both were matched approximately for age and sex to minimize confounding.   Data Collection Data was collected through a structured approach as follows.   Questionnaire Administration A standardized questionnaire was administered to all participants to gather demographic information and relevant medical history by direct face to face contact including the following data.   Demographics Age Gender Participant Number   Anthropometric Measurements Waist circumference: Using a flexible measuring tape, waist circumference was assessed at the midpoint between the lower rib and the iliac crest Height measurements were taken with a stadiometer, while weight was measured with a calibrated scale. The formula BMI = weight (kg)/height (m2) was used to compute the Body Mass Index (BMI)   Lifestyle and Medical History Smoking History of thyroid disease Family history of thyroid disease Chronic drug user Neck surgery or irradiation   Vital Parameters Blood pressure was measured using a sphygmomanometer after the participant had rested for at least 5 minutes. Both systolic and diastolic pressures were recorded   Investigations Each participant of the study from patient and control underwent the following investigation   Thyroid Function Tests Blood samples were drawn from participants to measure serum levels of Thyroid Stimulating Hormone (TSH), Free T4, and Free T3. These tests were performed using standard laboratory techniques(The LIAISON XL analyzer primarily uses chemiluminescence immunoassays (CLIA) for detection, specifically employing a sandwich assay format with magnetic microparticles)   Ultrasound of the Neck A qualified radiologist performed a neck ultrasound to evaluate the thyroid gland's The ultrasound assessed the presence of nodules, goiter, or other abnormalities and measurements of the thyroid gland was be recorded   Lipid Profile A fasting blood sample was collected to measure serum levels of total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL), high-density lipoprotein (HDL), and triglycerides. These were analyzed using standard enzymatic methods   Routine Laboratory Parameters Additional blood tests were performed including fasting glucose levels and liver function tests (e.g., ALT, AST, bilirubin) to rule out any underlying conditions that may affect thyroid function   Data Analysis The collected data was entered into an Excel spreadsheet for organization and preliminary analysis Statistical analysis was performed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 22. Descriptive statistics (mean, standard deviation, frequency, and percentage) summarized the demographic and clinical characteristics of the participants Comparisons between the metabolic syndrome group and the control group was conducted using: Independent t-tests for continuous variables (e.g., thyroid hormone levels, lipid profiles) Chi-square tests for categorical variables (e.g., presence of thyroid nodules) A p-value of less than 0.05 was be considered statistically significant, indicating a meaningful difference between the groups

RESULTS

This study purposively included a total of 100 participants, evenly distributed between individuals with Metabolic Syndrome (n = 50) and those without (n = 50), to enable an attentive comparison of key metabolic and cardiovascular indicators. The result revealed statistically significant differences across several variables. Participants with Metabolic Syndrome had a higher mean waist circumference (105.5 cm vs. 98.45 cm, p = 0.001), elevated triglyceride levels (204.26 mg/dL vs. 120.84 mg/dL, p<0.001), and higher fasting blood sugar (118.44 mg/dL vs. 96.53 mg/dL, p<0.001). Additionally, HDL cholesterol was significantly lower in the Metabolic Syndrome group (41 mg/dL vs. 46.59 mg/dL, p = 0.006), and systolic blood pressure was notably higher (133.3 mmHg vs. 122.86 mmHg, p<0.001). These findings align with the clinical criteria for Metabolic Syndrome and highlight the clustering of risk factors that contribute to increased cardiometabolic risk, as shown in Table 1. Table 1: Frequency Distribution Table of the Participants Variable Metabolic Syndrome N Mean Std. Deviation t-test for Equality of Means df Sig. (2-tailed) Mean Difference Age Yes 50 52.68 14.281 97 0.061 5.251 No 50 47.43 13.277 Waist Circumference (cm) Yes 50 105.5 11.68 97 0.001 7.051 No 50 98.45 8.347 TG (mg/dL) Yes 50 204.26 96.482 97 <0.001 83.423 No 50 120.84 44.958 HDL (mg/dL) Yes 50 41 9.837 97 0.006 -5.592 No 50 46.59 10.05 FBS (mg/dL) Yes 50 118.44 28.915 97 <0.001 21.909 No 50 96.53 7.848 Systolic Blood Yes 50 133.3 15.799 97 <0.001 10.443 Pressure (mmHg) No 50 122.86 10.849 FBS: Fasting Blood Sugar; HDL: High Density Lipoprotein; TG: Triglyceride The majority of participants 86% are classified as obese, while only a small fraction 2% have a normal weight as shown in Figure 1. More than half of the participants, 53%, are aged between 26 and 55, indicating that this age group is the most represented. Only a small percentage (4%) are under 25 years old. There is a higher representation of male, 53%, compared to females, 47%. As shown in Figure 2 and 3.     Figure 1: Participant Distribution by BMI     Figure 2: Participant Distribution by Age Group     Table 2 illustrates the distribution of thyroid abnormalities among participants with and without metabolic syndrome.   Table 2: Distribution of Thyroid Abnormalities in Individuals with and without Metabolic Syndrome Thyroid Abnormality Metabolic Syndrome (n = 50) Non-Metabolic Syndrome (n = 50) Total (n = 100) Euthyroid 29 (58.0%) 39 (78.0%) 68 (68.0%) Hypothyroidism 15 (30.0%) 5 (10.0%) 20 (20.0%) Sub-clinical Hypothyroidism 5 (10.0%) 5 (10.0%) 10 (10.0%) Subclinical Hyperthyroidism 1 (2.0%) 1 (2.0%) 2 (2.0%) p-value 0.008     Among those with metabolic syndrome (n = 50), the majority were euthyroid (58%), followed by hypothyroidism (30%), sub-clinical hypothyroidism (10%), and subclinical hyperthyroidism (2%). In contrast, among participants without metabolic syndrome (n = 50), a higher proportion were euthyroid (78%), with lower occurrences of hypothyroidism (10%), sub-clinical hypothyroidism (10%), and subclinical hyperthyroidism (2%). The statistical analysis yielded value of 0.008, indicating a significant association between thyroid status and the presence of metabolic syndrome. This study shows that among individuals with metabolic syndrome (50 studied cases) there is a trend of increased high TG levels in individuals with hypothyroid conditions, especially clinical hypothyroidism, compared to those with normal thyroid function. In Figure 4 we see elevated serum triglyceride levels observed at 73.3% of cases with hypothyroidism, 60.0% of cases with subclinical hypothyroidism, and 51.7% of euthyroid cases. The difference in triglyceride levels across thyroid dysfunction groups was statistically significant (p = 0.02). This suggests a possible association between thyroid dysfunction and elevated triglycerides, particularly in hypothyroid states.   Table 3: Thyroid Nodule Distribution by Metabolic Syndrome Status Group Thyroid Nodule Non nodular Total p-value Metabolic Syndrome 18 (36.0%) 32 (64.0%) 50 0.0044 Non-Metabolic Syndrome 5 (10.0%) 45 (90.0%) 50 Total 23 (23.0%) 77 (77.0%) 100   Among the 50 individuals with metabolic syndrome, 18(36%) was found to have thyroid nodules, compared to only 5(10%) among those without metabolic syndrome. A statistically significant association was observed between metabolic syndrome and the presence of thyroid nodules (χ2 = 8.13, p = 0.0044, df = 1). The higher proportion of thyroid nodules in the metabolic syndrome group suggests that this distribution is unlikely to be due to chance, as shown in Table 3.     Figure 3: Participant Distribution by Sex     Figure 4: Proportion and Association of Thyroid Abnormality with Serum TG Level Among Metabolic Cases

DISCUSSION

The aim of this study was to show the available proof on the association between metabolic syndrome, its components, and incidence of thyroid abnormalities. We found that thyroid abnormalities were more frequent in patients with metabolic syndrome in comparison to non-metabolic cases (42 and 22%). These findings are consistent with studies that found increased prevalence of thyroid disfunction among patients with metabolic syndrome [22-24]. However, there are a few studies that have assessed the inverse association, i.e., whether metabolic syndrome at baseline increases the risk of developing thyroid disease [25]. In our study we found that the reverse is also true; there is a clear association between metabolic syndrome and thyroid dysfunction particularly subclinical and overt hypothyroidism. A study by Jayakumar [26] found that out of 120 patients who were diagnosed with metabolic syndrome, thyroid functions were normal in 48 patients. Hypothyroidism and subclinical hypothyroidism were present in 60% of patients with metabolic syndrome. Another study by Ogbera et al. in Nigeria showed the proportion of subjects with hypothyroidism, euthyroid and hyperthyroidism who had metabolic syndrome, was 40.0, 42.0 and 24.0%, respectively [27]. These findings reinforce the bi-directional relationship between these conditions. In addition, there was a significant difference noted among the serum triglyceride levels of the participants, with the hypothyroid patients exhibiting higher levels. It is well known that thyroid hormones play an important role in lipid metabolism and clearance [10]. The observed association in our study aligns with evidence reporting the association between hypertriglyceridemia and hypothyroidism [28]. Interestingly, animal studies by Han and colleagues revealed that excess of iodine combined with fatty diet could lead to damage to thyroid glands and thyroid dysfunction in mice [29]. This could explain our findings of increased thyroid nodules in patients with metabolic syndrome. This association is also demonstrated by a study done by Li et al. [30]. Several mechanisms may be responsible for this association. Insulin resistance, which is a key component of metabolic syndrome, can stimulate the proliferation of thyroid cells through insulin and insulin-like growth factors [31]. This could potentially explain the increased prevalence o of thyroid nodules. Moreover, adipokines such as leptin could adversely impact the hypothalamic-pituitary-thyroid axis, causing alterations in TSH secretion [32].   From a clinical standpoint, the findings of this study underscore the importance of performing thyroid evaluation in patients with metabolic syndrome to aid early detection and management of conditions that may be subclinical yet contribute to adverse cardiovascular outcomes [16]. Integrating thyroid function testing into metabolic syndrome management guidelines could therefore aid in improving risk stratification and developing preventative strategies particularly in Iraq, where prevalence of obesity, cardiovascular disease, and diabetes is on the rise [33].

CONCLUSIONS

his study demonstrated a higher prevalence of thyroid abnormalities, particularly hypothyroidism and thyroid nodules, among metabolic syndrome patients. Elevated serum triglycerides were also more strongly associated with thyroid dysfunction, highlighting a potential link between metabolic and endocrine dysfunction. Clinically, these findings mean that routinely performing thyroid function testing and ultrasound in patients with metabolic syndrome would be vital for better metabolic control and optimization of overall health. Future studies in the field should focus on a larger sample size taken from multiple settings in order to truly scope the effects of these conditions. Interventional studies are needed to assess whether treating thyroid dysfunction in metabolic syndrome improves outcomes.   Limitations This study has several limitations. Its cross-sectional design will not establish causality. The sample size is relatively small and limited to a single center, which may affect generalizability. Second, there is potential for selection bias and reliance on self-reported data, which could introduce inaccuracies. Third, some confounding factors may have been missed despite exclusion criteria. Fourth, the short data collection period limits understanding of long-term changes.   Acknowledgement I am deeply thankful to my teacher Dr. Yousif Bahaaddin for her continuous support throughout this research work.

References1. World Health Organization. Invisible Numbers: The True Extent of Noncommunicable Diseases and What to Do About Them. Geneva: WHO, 2022. Available from: https://apps. who.int/iris/rest/bitstreams/1466662.2. Alwan, A. et al. “Addressing the Growing Burden of Chronic Noncommunicable Diseases.” Public Health and Preventive Medicine, edited by M.I. Boulton, McGraw Hill, United States, 2022, pp. 300-312.3. National Cholesterol Education Program Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults. “Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III) Final Report.” Circulation, vol. 106, no. 25, 2002, pp. 3143-3421.4. Alberti, K.G. et al. “Harmonizing the Metabolic Syndrome: A Joint Interim Statement.” Circulation, vol. 120, no. 16, 2009, pp. 1640-1645.5. Mottillo, S. et al. “The Metabolic Syndrome and Cardiovascular Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 56, no. 14, 2010, pp. 1113-1132.6. Grundy, S.M. et al. “Definition of Metabolic Syndrome.” Circulation, vol. 109, no. 3, 2004, pp. 433-438.7. Noubiap, J.J. et al. “Geographic Distribution of Metabolic Syndrome and Its Components.” Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice, vol. 188, 2022, p. 109924.8. Saklayen, M.G. “The Global Epidemic of the Metabolic Syndrome.” Current Hypertension Reports, vol. 20, no. 2, 2018, p. 12.9. Park, Y.W. et al. “The Metabolic Syndrome: Prevalence and Associated Risk Factors.” Archives of Internal Medicine, vol. 163, no. 4, 2003, pp. 427-436.10. Oh, H.S. et al. “Association Between Thyroid Dysfunction and Lipid Profiles.” Thyroid, vol. 28, no. 7, 2018, pp. 849-856.11. Huang, X. et al. “Prevalence of Thyroid Dysfunction in a Chinese Population.” Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity, vol. 13, 2020, pp. 4361-4368.12. Cai, Y. et al. “Blood Pressure Levels in Subclinical Thyroid Dysfunction.” Hypertension Research, vol. 34, no. 10, 2011, pp. 1098-1105.13. Kim, J.M. et al. “Thyroid Function and Obesity Phenotypes.” Diabetes & Metabolism Journal, vol. 43, no. 6, 2019, pp. 867-878.14. Boelaert, K. “Thyroid Dysfunction in the Elderly.” Nature Reviews Endocrinology, vol. 9, no. 4, 2013, pp. 194-204.15. Sabatino, L. and C. Vassalle. “Thyroid Hormones and Metabolism Regulation: Which Role on Brown Adipose Tissue and Browning Process?” Biomolecules, vol. 15, no. 3, 2025, p. 361. doi:10.3390/biom1503036116. Chang, C.H. et al. “Metabolic Syndrome and Subclinical Hypothyroidism.” Scientific Reports, vol. 7, no. 1, 2017, p. 6754.17. Alexander, C.M. et al. “Metabolic Syndrome and Coronary Heart Disease.” Diabetes, vol. 52, no. 5, 2003, pp. 1210-1214.18. Pingitore, A. et al. “Metabolic Syndrome, Thyroid Dysfunction, and Cardiovascular Risk: The Triptych of Evil.” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 25, no. 19, 2024, p. 10628. doi:10.3390/ijms25191062819. Cameron, A.J. et al. “Metabolic Syndrome and Future Diabetes.” Journal of Internal Medicine, vol. 264, no. 2, 2008, pp. 177-186.20. Rezzonico, J. et al. “Thyroid Gland and Insulin Resistance.” Thyroid, vol. 18, no. 4, 2008, pp. 461-464.21. Karar, M. et al. “Association Between Metabolic Syndrome and Subclinical Hypothyroidism: A Systematic Review.” Cureus, published online 2025. doi:10.7759/cureus.8447522. Verma, D.P. et al. “Hypothyroidism in Metabolic Syndrome.” Annals of African Medicine, vol. 23, no. 4, 2024, pp. 717-722. doi:10.4103/aam.aam_25_2423. El-Hay, G.A.E.S.A. et al. “Evaluation of the Frequency and Patterns of Thyroid Dysfunction in Patients with Metabolic Syndrome.” The Egyptian Journal of Internal Medicine, vol. 33, no. 1, 2021. doi:10.1186/s43162-021-00054-z24. Deshmukh, V. et al. “Thyroid Dysfunction in Patients with Metabolic Syndrome: A Cross-Sectional, Epidemiological, Pan-India Study.” International Journal of Endocrinology, vol. 2018, 2018, p. 2930251. Published December 2018. doi:10.1155/2018/293025125. Alwan, H. et al. “A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Investigating the Relationship Between Metabolic Syndrome and the Incidence of Thyroid Diseases.” Endocrine, vol. 84, no. 2, 2024, pp. 320-327. doi:10.1007/s12020-023-03503-726. Jayakumar, R.V. “Hypothyroidism and Metabolic Syndrome.” Thyroid Research and Practice, vol. 10, 2013, pp. 1-2.27. Ogbera, A.O. et al. “Metabolic Syndrome in Thyroid Disease in Nigeria.” Indian Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 16, 2012, pp. 417-422.28. Rizos, C.V. et al. “Thyroid Dysfunction and Lipid Profile.” Open Cardiovascular Medicine Journal, vol. 5, 2011, pp. 76-84.29. Han, H. et al. “Excess Iodine and High-Fat Diet in Mice.” Biological Trace Element Research, vol. 147, nos. 1-3, 2012, pp. 233-239.30. Li, Z. et al. “A Mechanism Exploration of Metabolic Syndrome Causing Nodular Thyroid Disease.” International Journal of Endocrinology, vol. 2019, 2019, p. 9376768.31. Moradi, L. et al. “Evaluation of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) for Patients with and without Thyroid Nodules: A Patient-Based Study.” Advanced Biomedical Research, vol. 12, 2023, p. 208. Published August 2023. doi:10.4103/abr.abr_63_2132. Pather, R. et al. “The Effects of Obesity on Thyroid Function in a Metabolically Healthy High-Fat, High-Carbohydrate Diet-Induced Obese Rat Model.” Frontiers in Endocrinology, vol. 16, 2025. doi:10.3389/fendo.2025.153862733. World Health Organization, Regional Office for the Eastern Mediterranean. Noncommunicable Diseases. Baghdad: WHO EMRO, [cited September 2025]. Available from: https://www. emro.who.int/iraq/priority-areas/noncommunicable-diseases. html.