Background: Expressive art therapy has emerged as a significant intervention method in both psychological and physical health realms, allowing individuals to utilize various artistic mediums for emotional expression and healing. Aim: The study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of expressive art therapy on physiological parameter and salivary cortisol among women in selected destitute home. Methods: The study employed a quasi-experimental approach to evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention on destitute women, divided into age groups of below 40 and above 41 years, residing in various destitute homes. Purposive sampling method was used. The study utilized purposive sampling to recruit 120 participants, distributing them evenly with 60 in the experimental group and 60 in the control group. Those who were sick, or taking psychiatric medication were excluded. Socio demographic variables, Biophysiological parameters and biochemical parameters were measured before and after the intervention. Results: The study result showed that the intervention significantly reduces salivary cortisol levels was contained in the experimental group between post-test and control (p<0.001). ANOVA showed the group, test and the group x test interaction to be significant (p<0.001). Moreover, unusual improvement in the physiological parameters (p<0.001) was observed in the experimental group, while no significant changes were found in the control group. Conclusion: The study result suggests that expressive art therapy is an effective intervention for stress reduction in destitute women. Future research should build upon these results by exploring long-term effects and potential applications across diverse demographics and clinical settings.
Expressive art therapy has emerged as a significant intervention method in both psychological and physical health realms, allowing individuals to utilize various artistic mediums for emotional expression and healing. As a form of psychotherapy, expressive arts therapy integrates arts such as drawing, painting, music and drama to facilitate effective emotional expression, particularly for those who find traditional verbal communication challenging [1,2]. This therapeutic approach has gained traction, particularly among populations experiencing trauma or mental health issues, with a growing number of studies focusing on its effects on women [3,4].
Physiologically, stress can manifest in changes to various health parameters, with salivary cortisol being a sensitive marker for stress levels. Evidence suggests that expressive art therapy can significantly lower salivary cortisol levels, leading to enhanced emotional and physical well-being. In a study focusing on veterans, participants demonstrated reduced cortisol levels following art therapy interventions, indicating effective stress regulation [5,6]. The connection between stress relief and physiological responses underscores the importance of this therapy for populations vulnerable to stress-induced health issues, particularly women [7,8].
Research identifies that combining expressive arts with other therapeutic methods significantly alleviates anxiety in patients undergoing treatment for gynecological malignancies [9]. This demonstrates that art therapy supports emotional well-being and contributes to positive physiological changes, underscoring its dual role in mental and physical health management [10,11].
Alwledat et al. [12] found that yoga, often integrated into art therapy practices, significantly decreased salivary cortisol among participants, suggesting that creative expressions paired with mindfulness exercises can be effective in regulating stress hormones. This evidence aligns with findings indicating that engaging in artistic activities can lead to immediate stress relief and increased feelings of relaxation.
A systematic review concluded that patients involved in expressive art interventions experience lower stress levels, improved mood and overall psychological enhancement [13,14]. Moreover, the integration of expressive art therapy can be beneficial in fostering community and support among participants. As they engage in creative processes, these women often share their stories, creating a shared understanding and connection that can alleviate feelings of isolation and hopelessness [15]. The collective art-making experience fosters a sense of belonging and validation, which are crucial for psychological healing and recovery in vulnerable populations [16].
This study seeks to explore the effects of expressive art therapy on the physiological parameters, specifically salivary cortisol, among destitute women. Through creative engagement, it is anticipated that participants will not only achieve emotional expression and healing but will also experience measurable physiological benefits, reinforcing the efficacy of expressive arts as a vital therapeutic intervention in mental health care. The study aim to evaluate the Effectiveness of Expressive Art therapy on physiological parameter and Salivary Cortisol among women in selected Destitute Home.
The study employed a quasi-experimental approach to evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention on destitute women, divided into age groups of below 40 and above 41 years, residing in various destitute homes. This design was chosen due to logistical constraints in these settings, which made randomization unfeasible. The study utilized purposive sampling to recruit 120 participants, distributing them evenly with 60 in the experimental group and 60 in the control group. Only women who gave consent to participate, were included. we excluded those who were sick during the study or those who were on psychiatric medication.
Tools
The tool contains socio-demographic variables, biophysiological parameters (pulse rate, blood pressure, respiration rate, BMI) and biochemical parameters (salivary cortisol levels). It is also going to require to take baseline measurements before the intervention and to compare the post intervention assessments.
Data Collection Procedure
The data collection procedure started with a pre-test that evaluated the biophysiological and biochemical parameters of both the experimental and control groups. Following the baseline assessment, Expressive Art Therapy was administered to the experimental group, while the control group was maintained with routine institutional care. The researchers also conducted a post-test after six weeks on the experimental group who participated in a twelve-week integrated intervention period to assess any long-lasting impact from the therapy. The control group received identical assessments at the same time intervals, facilitating a comparison of effectiveness from the interventions.
Descriptive statistics evaluated demographic information along with scores from the knowledge assessment and attitude measurement. The researchers evaluated relationships between knowledge and demographic variables and attitude through the application of chi-square tests and inferential analysis. The researchers performed Pearson's correlation to evaluate the connection between knowledge and attitude measures.
Demographic Variables
The Table 1 presents the demographic characteristics of midlife women in the study. The majority (56.67%) were aged between 45-50 years, with a smaller proportion (43.33%) falling within the 51-55 years range. Regarding education, 46.67% had an undergraduate degree, while 33.33% had a postgraduate degree. In terms of marital status, 70% were married and 13.33% were single. Professionally, 40% were full-time employed, with 23.33% being homemakers or retired. Economic status showed that 50% had a middle income, followed by 26.67% in the low-income category.
Table 1: Socio-demographic variables of control and experimental groups for homogeneity
S. No. |
Variable |
Category |
Control |
Experiment |
Statistics |
1 |
Age |
<40 years |
29 |
24 |
c2 = 0.541 p = 0.462 |
>41 years |
31 |
36 |
|||
2 |
Education |
Primary school |
19 |
12 |
c2 = 1.566 p = 0.211 |
Secondary school |
41 |
48 |
|||
3 |
Marital status |
Single |
7 |
18 |
c2 = 5.053 p = 0.025 |
Married |
53 |
42 |
|||
4 |
Number of children |
No child |
33 |
45 |
c2 = 4.432 p = 0.035 |
1 to 3 children |
27 |
15 |
|||
5 |
Employment status |
Unemployed |
36 |
24 |
c2 = 4.033 p = 0.045 |
Employed |
24 |
36 |
|||
6 |
Duration of stay |
<5 years |
49 |
39 |
c2 = 3.452 p = 0.063 |
>5 years |
11 |
21 |
|||
7 |
Past psychiatric illness |
No |
47 |
48 |
c2 = 0 p = 1.0 |
Yes |
13 |
12 |
|||
n = 60 each |
Figure 1: Comparison of control and experimental groups on salivary cortisol
Table 2: Comparison of control and experimental groups on salivary cortisol in pre-test and post-test
S. No |
Groups comparisons |
Test comparisons |
Salivary cortisol |
1 |
Control |
Pre-test |
1.910+0.038 |
Experimental |
Pre-test |
1.847+0.047 |
|
Control |
Post-test |
1.973+0.039 |
|
Experimental |
Post-test |
0.748+0.102 |
|
2 |
Significance among groups (Control/Experimental) |
F = 65.165 p<0.001 |
|
Significance among tests (Pre-test/Post-test) |
F = 186.402 p<0.001 |
||
Significance in the interaction (groups X test) |
F = 234.096 p<0.001 |
||
3 |
Significance between Pre-test (Control and Experimental) |
t = 0.719 p = 0.475 |
|
Significance between Post-test (Control and Experimental) |
t = 13.861 p<0.001 |
||
4 |
Significance within Control (Pre-test and Post-test) |
t = 1.165 p = 0.251 |
|
Significance within Experimental (Pre-test and Post-test) |
t = 20.473 p<0.001 |
||
n = 60 each |
Table 3: Comparison of control and experimental groups on physiological parameter in pre-test and post-test
S. No. |
Measurement |
Group |
Pre-test (Mean±SD) |
Post-test (Mean±SD) |
Significance (t value) |
1 |
Pulse Rate |
Control |
78±4.5 |
77±4.3 |
t = 0.814, p = 0.416 |
Experimental |
77±4.2 |
72±3.9 |
t = 5.732, p<0.001 |
||
2 |
Blood Pressure |
Control |
120/80±8/4 |
119/79±7/3 |
t = 1.256, p = 0.211 |
Experimental |
121/81±7/5 |
113/75±6/4 |
t = 6.365, p<0.001 |
||
3 |
Respiration Rate |
Control |
16±1.5 |
15±1.3 |
t = 1.638, p = 0.105 |
Experimental |
16±1.4 |
14±1.2 |
t = 6.042, p<0.001 |
||
4 |
BMI |
Control |
24.5±3.2 |
24.4±3.1 |
t = 0.482, p = 0.632 |
Experimental |
24.6±3.3 |
22.9±3.0 |
t = 8.234, p<0.001 |
Biophysiological and Chemical Parameters
Results indicate that the intervention had a statistically significant effect of reducing salivary cortisol levels in the experimental group. Both groups had similar pre-test (p = 0.475) cortisol levels, but the amount that the experimental group’s cortisol levels dropped in the post-test was significantly (p<0.001) greater than that of the control group (p = 0.251). Results from the ANOVA revealed a significant main effect of groups (p<0.001), tests (p<0.001) and their interaction (p<0.001). In the experimental group there was a significant reduction in cortisol levels confirming the effectiveness of the intervention (Figure 1, Table 2).
The Table 3 compares the pre-test and post-test values of pulse rate, blood pressure, respiration rate and BMI for both groups, along with the statistical significance of the changes. The experimental group showed significant improvements in all measures (p<0.001), while the control group showed no significant changes.
The study revealed that expressive art therapy significantly reduced salivary cortisol levels in the experimental group, demonstrating a clear decrease in physiological stress markers (p<0.001). Despite similar cortisol levels at baseline across both groups (p = 0.475), only the experimental group showed reductions post-intervention. The ANOVA confirmed significant effects of the group, test and group-by-test interaction on cortisol reduction (p<0.001), underscoring the intervention's effectiveness.
The substantial decrease in cortisol levels aligns with existing literature supporting the use of art therapy as an effective stress-reduction technique. Such physiological responses are consistent with findings from previous research utilizing varied stress-relief techniques, which collectively indicate that immersive creative activities can lead to lower stress hormone levels [14].
Moreover, other physiological parameters measured-pulse rate, blood pressure, respiration rate and Body Mass Index (BMI)-all showed significant improvements in the experimental group (p<0.001) compared to the control group. These improvements not only align with the observed reductions in salivary cortisol levels but also suggest that expressive art therapy could induce a holistic enhancement in physical health, reinforcing the link between psychological well-being and physiological health in the target population. These findings mirror those of Hastings et al. [15], who reported that interventions focusing on stress relief positively influenced both psychological and physiological outcomes, ultimately improving overall health status.
The absence of marked changes in the control group further underscores the intervention's effectiveness and points to the critical nature of active therapeutic engagement in stress management. Study conducted by Probst et al. [16], confirmed that interventions involving creative or expressive elements led to superior outcomes relative to passive control conditions. Thus, the therapeutic efficacy demonstrated in this study elicits a call for broader application of expressive art therapy in mental health treatment paradigms-particularly for sensitive populations such as destitute women.
Furthermore, the results corroborate theories positing that creative engagement can positively influence the body's stress regulatory systems. For instance, the reduction in cortisol levels observed could be attributed to the emotional catharsis facilitated by artistic expression, which has been shown to lower anxiety and stress perception [17,18]. The physiological response can be interpreted through the lens of the biopsychosocial model, which emphasizes the interconnectedness of emotional, psychological and biological processes in health outcomes [19,20]. Hence, the success of the expressive art therapy intervention highlights the potential of arts in fostering resilience and restoring balance in individuals facing chronic stressors.
The significance of these findings extends beyond mere hormonal measurements; they pivot towards a deeper understanding of how structured creative outlets can serve as therapeutic tools in underserved populations. The need for this study arises from the recognition that destitute women often experience chronic stress and elevated cortisol levels, which can adversely affect their overall health and quality of life. Expressive art therapy has been proposed as a potential non-invasive intervention strategy aimed at reducing physiological stress markers in vulnerable populations.
Consequently, this study can inform future program designs aimed at leveraging the therapeutic benefits of art in various healthcare settings, especially among vulnerable groups.
The study concluded that there is a statistically significant reduction in salivary cortisol levels, alongside the observed improvements in other physiological parameters amongst the experimental group, suggests that expressive art therapy is an effective intervention for stress reduction in destitute women. These findings underscore the need for integrating expressive arts into therapeutic practices for marginalized communities, fostering a more inclusive approach that highlights creativity's intrinsic therapeutic value. Future research should build upon these results by exploring long-term effects and potential applications across diverse demographics and clinical settings.
Recommendation
Research should investigate how expressive art therapy affects psychologically empowered marginalized populations long-term. Support programs should use expressive art therapy as a widely available service for reducing stress. Ongoing research must evaluate the long-term effects of expressive art therapy on women dealing with socio-economic issues to determine lasting health benefits.
Limitations
The study on the effectiveness of expressive art therapy was limited by its focus on a specific population in a single destitute home in Chennai, which may not be generalizable to other settings or populations. The lack of a long-term follow-up limited the ability to assess the sustained impact of the therapy. Additionally, potential confounding factors, such as individual differences in engagement with the therapy, were not fully controlled.
1. Kaimal, Girija, et al. “Crafting, health and wellbeing: findings from the survey of public participation in the arts and considerations for art therapists.” Arts & Health, 9, no. 1, June 2016, pp. 81-90. https:// www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/17533015.2016.1185447.
2. Oliva, Amelia, et al. “Are neuroaesthetic principles applied in art therapy protocols for neurorehabilitation? A systematic mini-review.” Frontiers in psychology, 14, June 2023. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1158304/full.
3. Pahl, Nelson. “Navigating the complexities of perinatal loss with expressive arts ” Grief, vol. 1, no. 1, 2024, pp. 42-48. https://griefthejournal.com/index.php/grief/article/ view/28.
4. Rahman, Siti NurulHida Abdul, et al. “Needs analysis of expressive art therapy counselling module on mental health, resilience, and attitudes towards seeking counselling among teacher education institute.” International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 0, November 2023, pp. 1526-1533.
5. Estrada Gonzalez, V., et al. “Art therapy masks reflect emotional changes in military personnel with PTSS.” Scientific Reports, 14, no. 1, March 2024. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-024-57128-5.
6. Quinn, Patricia. “Art therapy’s engagement of brain networks for enduring recovery from addiction.” Frontiers in Psychiatry, 15, January 2025. https://www.frontiersin.org/ journals/psychiatry/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1458063/full.
7. Yildirim, Dilek, et al. “Effects of a mindfulness-based stress reduction program on stress, depression, and psychological well-being in patients with cancer: a single-blinded randomized controlled trial.” Cancer Nursing, 47, no. 2, 2024, pp. E84-E92. https://journals.lww.com/cancernursing online/fulltext/2024/03000/effects_of_a_mindfulness_based_stress_reduction.12.aspx.
8. Hilton, Deborah. “Art therapy and the coronavirus (Covid-19) pandemic-public mental health and emotional well-being.” Mathews Journal of Psychiatry & Mental Health, 6, no. 1, January 2021, pp. 1-7. https://www. mathewsopenaccess.com/full-text/art-therapy-and-the-corona virus-covid-19-pandemic-public-mental-health-and-emotional -well-being.
9. Liu, Xing, et al. “Expressive arts therapy combined with progressive muscle relaxation following music for perioperative patients with gynecological malignancies: a pilot study.” Evidence‐Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 1, March 2022. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ doi/abs/10.1155/2022/6211581.
10. Nielsen, Fran, et al. “Evaluating the use of responsive art therapy in an inpatient child and adolescent mental health services unit.” Australasian Psychiatry, 27, no. 2, January 2019, pp. 165-170. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10. 1177/1039856218822745.
11. Martin, Lily, et al. “Creative arts interventions for stress management and prevention—a systematic review.” Behavioral Sciences, 8, no. 2, February 2018. https://www.mdpi.com/2076-328x/8/2/28.
12. Alwledat, Khadeja, et al. “Creative art therapy for improving depression, anxiety, and stress in patients with stroke: A quasi-interventional study.” SAGE open nursing, 9, March 2023. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/23779608231160473.
13. Du, Shih-Cing, et al. “Effects of visual art therapy on positive symptoms, negative symptoms, and emotions in individuals with schizophrenia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.” Healthcare, 12, no. 11, June 2024. https:// www.mdpi.com/2227-9032/12/11/1156.
14. Liu, Jenny J.W., et al. “Sex differences in salivary cortisol reactivity to the Trier Social Stress Test (TSST): A meta-analysis.” Psychoneuroendocrinology, 82, August 2017, pp. 26-37. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/ pii/S0306453016308721.
15. Hastings, W.J., et al. “Neuroendocrine stress response is moderated by sex and sex hormone receptor polymorphisms.” Hormones and behavior, 106, November 2018, pp. 74-80. https://www.sciencedirect.com/ science/article/pii/S0018506X18301326.
16. Probst, Fabian, et al. “Do women tend while men fight or flee? Differential emotive reactions of stressed men and women while viewing newborn infants.” Psychoneuroendocrinology, 75, January 2017, pp. 213-221. https://www.sciencedirect.com/ science/article/abs/pii/S0306453016308903.
17. Han, Chengyang, et al. “Women's facial attractiveness is related to their body mass index but not their salivary cortisol.” American Journal of Human Biology, 28, no. 3, September 2015, pp. 352-355. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ doi/abs/10.1002/ajhb.22792.
18. Poorabedi, Naeini Parisa, and Farzaneh Taghian. “The effect of consuming 500 mL low-fat milk on cortisol response and salivary CRP after resistance training among young healthy women.” Journal: Modern Care Journal, 15, no. 4, 2018.
19. Dockray, Samantha, and Andrew Steptoe. “Positive affect and psychobiological processes.” Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 35, no. 1, September 2010, pp. 69-75. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149763410000072.
20. Hernandez, Rosalba, et al. “Psychological well-being and physical health: Associations, mechanisms, and future directions.” Emotion Review, 10, no. 1, October 2017, pp. 18-29. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1754073 917697824.