Research Article | | Volume 14 Special Issue 2 (July to August, 2025) | Pages 9 - 13

Behaviour Management Skills Among Dentists: Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice in Managing Child Patients in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
Under a Creative Commons license
Open Access
Received
July 18, 2025
Revised
Aug. 5, 2025
Accepted
Aug. 10, 2025
Published
Sept. 5, 2025

Abstract

Background: Paediatric dental fear is a common challenge that requires effective behaviour management techniques (BMTs). Dentists’ knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) in this area influence treatment outcomes and children’s acceptance of care. This study assessed the KAP of dentists in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, regarding BMTs. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 116 licensed dentists who manage paediatric patients in governmental and private practices. A bilingual (English and Arabic) questionnaire was distributed electronically. The tool assessed demographics, knowledge, attitudes (confidence, training adequacy, and willingness for further education), and practices regarding BMTs. Descriptive statistics and chi-square/Fisher’s exact tests were applied, with significance set at p<0.05. Results: Of 116 respondents, 76.7% were under 40 years, and 65.5% were general dentists. Awareness of BMTs was high (91.4%), yet only 38.8% reported adequate confidence in managing fearful children. Tell-Show-Do (54.3%) was the most used technique, followed by distraction (14.7%) and positive reinforcement (8.6%). Awareness was significantly higher among older dentists (>40 years, p = 0.001), postgraduates (p = 0.007), and those in the public sector (p = 0.043). However, 44.8% had not attended any postgraduate training in dental fear, and only 15.5% had attended several. Most dentists (74.1%) expressed willingness to attend workshops on behaviour management. Conclusion: While knowledge of BMTs was widespread, gaps remained in confidence and postgraduate training, especially among younger and non-specialist dentists. Targeted curricula and structured continuing education are recommended to strengthen non-pharmacological behaviour management and reduce reliance on pharmacological interventions.

Keywords
Paediatric Dentistry, Dental Fear, Behaviour Management Techniques, Continuing Education, KAP Study

INTRODUCTION

Paediatric dental fear and anxiety can adversely affect cooperation, prolong treatment, and compromise outcomes [1]. Behaviour management techniques (BMTs) are fundamental tools for alleviating these challenges through evidence-based, child-centred approaches such as Tell-Show-Do, distraction, and positive reinforcement [2-4]. International guidelines, including those of the American Academy of Paediatric Dentistry (AAPD), recommend integrating behavioural, psychological, and communication strategies in paediatric dental care [5].

 

The choice and success of BMTs are strongly shaped by cultural and regional contexts. For instance, directive methods are more common in hierarchical societies such as India and Bosnia [6,7], while autonomy-based strategies are emphasized in Australia [8]. Saudi Arabia’s cultural context, including parental involvement and gendered perceptions of fear, may significantly influence BMT application, yet local evidence remains limited [9].

 

Globally, dentists’ knowledge and confidence vary, with studies showing that paediatric dentists employ more diverse BMTs than general dentists [10,11]. Saudi studies highlight that although awareness is relatively high, training opportunities remain insufficient [12]. Given that dentists’ self-efficacy and professional development strongly predict effective application [13], assessing local KAP is essential.

 

This study aimed to assess dentists’ knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding paediatric BMTs in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, and to identify gaps that can inform training and curriculum development. In contrast, countries with well-established preventive programs, such as Denmark and Japan, report lower levels of dental fear among children [14]. In Saudi Arabia, Alshoraim et al. found that although there was no significant association between previous dental visits and fear levels, female children exhibited higher levels of fear, suggesting possible cultural influences on anxiety expression [15]

 

The success of BMTs is also strongly tied to the dentist’s confidence and experience. Dentists who feel comfortable using a particular technique are more likely to apply it effectively and frequently [16]. Structured education and hands-on training have been shown to improve both skill and comfort levels in applying behaviour management methods, underscoring the importance of continued professional development [17]. Moreover, paediatric dentists typically employ a more diverse and nuanced range of BMTs than their general dental counterparts, as demonstrated in comparative studies from Germany and Saudi Arabia [18,19]. Given this background, the present study explored the knowledge, attitudes, and use of behaviour management techniques among dental professionals in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. The aim was to identify current practices, highlight areas needing improvement, and support future training efforts to enhance paediatric dental care.

METHODS

A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted among dentists practicing in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, between March and April 2023.

 

Sample Size

Based on a 95% confidence level, 5% margin of error, and assumed prevalence of 50%, the calculated sample was 384. However, only 116 responses were obtained, yielding an underpowered sample.

 

Sampling

Convenience and snowball sampling were employed through clinic directories, hospital rosters, and professional networks. Inclusion criteria were dentists licensed in Jeddah who manage paediatric patients; exclusion criteria were dentists not treating children.

 

Questionnaire

A structured bilingual (English/Arabic) questionnaire, adapted from validated international surveys [14–16], was pilot-tested on 20 dentists. It comprised four domains: (1) demographics, (2) knowledge of BMTs, (3) attitudes (confidence, adequacy of undergraduate training, willingness for further learning), and (4) practices (technique usage and treatment adjustments). Content validity was reviewed by two paediatric dentistry experts.

 

Data Analysis

Data were analysed using SPSS v26. Descriptive statistics summarized responses. Chi-square or Fisher’s exact tests were applied where appropriate. Significance was set at p<0.05.

RESULTS

Of the 116 respondents, 74.1% were Saudi nationals, 76.7% were under 40 years, and 54.3% were male. General dentists formed 65.5% of the sample, while only 4.3% specialized in paediatric dentistry.

 

Knowledge

Majority of the respondents i.e. 91.4% reported awareness of BMTs. Awareness differed significantly by age (>40 years: 31.3% vs. <40 years: 5.0%, p = 0.001), qualification (postgraduates: 26.1% vs. general dentists: 4.3%, p = 0.007), and practice sector (public: 15.9% vs. private: 3.8%, p = 0.043).

 

Attitudes

Confidence was reported as adequate by 38.8%, fair by 56.0%, and inadequate by 5.2%. Undergraduate training was judged as “just enough” by 54.3%, though 41.4% wished they had more. Regarding postgraduate exposure, 44.8% had none, 39.7% attended a little, and 15.5% attended several courses. Encouragingly, 74.1% expressed willingness to attend workshops.

 

Practices

Non-pharmacological BMTs were preferred by 82.8%. Tell-Show-Do was most common (54.3%), followed by distraction (14.7%) and positive reinforcement (8.6%). Pharmacological methods were reported by 17.2%. Many respondents allowed extra appointment time (37.1% always, 36.2% occasionally) and adjusted treatment plans for fearful children (50.9% always, 37.1% occasionally) (Table 1-5).

 

Table 1: Sociodemographic and practice characteristics of participants

Characteristics

N

%

Nationality

Non-Saudi

30

25.9

Saudi

86

74.1

Age

Below 40

89

76.7

Above 40

27

23.3

Gender

Female

53

45.7

Male

63

54.3

Locality of Practice

Urban

107

92.2

Rural

9

7.8

Level of Practice

Hospital

59

50.9

Dispensary/ Health care center

57

49.1

Sector of Practice

Public

51

44.0

Private

65

56.0

Number of Years in Clinical Practice

Less than 5 years

70

60.3

More than 5 years

46

39.7

Level of Professional Training

Graduate in Dental‎/ General practice

76

65.5

Post-graduate in Pediatric Dentistry

5

4.3

Post-graduate in other dental specialty

35

30.2

 

Table 2: Awareness and Attitudes regarding dental fear management

Variable

Category

N

%

Confidence in treating children with dental fear

Adequate

45

38.8

Fair

65

56.0

Inadequate

6

5.2

UG training about dental fear

No training

2

1.7

Just enough

63

54.3

Wish had more

48

41.4

Wish had less

3

2.6

Attended postgrad courses

None

52

44.8

A little

46

39.7

Several

18

15.5

Awareness of behaviour management techniques

Aware

106

91.4

Unaware

10

8.6

 

Table 3: Awareness of behaviour management techniques according to the sociodemographic and practice characteristics of participants

Parameter

Variable

Aware

Unaware

Total

p-value

Nationality

Non-Saudi

4 (19.0%)

17 (81.0%)

21 (100.0%)

0.085

Saudi

5 (6.7%)

70 (93.3%)

75 (100.0%)

Age

Above 40

5 (31.3%)

11 (68.8%)

16 (100.0%)

0.001

Below 40

4 (5.0%)

76 (95.0%)

80 (100.0%)

Gender

Female

4 (8.9%)

41 (91.1%)

45 (100.0%)

0.878

Male

5 (9.8%)

46 (90.2%)

51 (100.0%)

Area of practice

Urban

9 (10.2%)

79 (89.8%)

88 (100.0%)

0.343

Rural

0 (0.0%)

8 (100.0%)

8 (100.0%)

Level of Practice

Hospital

6 (13.3%)

39 (86.7%)

45 (100.0%)

0.211

Clinics/Dispy.

3 (5.9%)

48 (94.1%)

51 (100.0%)

Sector of practice

Public

7 (15.9%)

37 (84.1%)

44 (100.0%)

0.043

Private

2 (3.8%)

50 (96.2%)

52 (100.0%)

Years in Practice

<5 years

4 (6.2%)

61 (93.8%)

65 (100.0%)

0.117

>=5 years

5 (16.1%)

26 (83.9%)

31 (100.0%)

Qualification

Graduate/ General

3 (4.3%)

67 (95.7%)

70 (100.0%)

0.007

Post-grad Paediatric

0 (0.0%)

3 (100.0%)

3 (100.0%)

Post-Grad Other Specialty

6 (26.1%)

17 (73.9%)

23 (100.0%)

 

Table 4: Practice-Related Behaviour regarding dental fear in children

Variable

Category

N

%

Sought support about dental fear

None

11

9.5

Colleague

48

41.4

Paediatric dentist

33

28.4

Internet

12

10.3

Scientific papers

7

6.0

Others

5

4.3

Allow extra time for fearful child

Never

2

1.7

Rarely

9

7.8

Once in a while

42

36.2

Sometimes

20

17.2

Always

43

37.1

Adjust treatment plan for dental fear

Never

1

0.9

Rarely

4

3.4

Once in a while

43

37.1

Sometimes

9

7.8

Always

59

50.9

Behaviour management technique used

Pharmacological

20

17.2

Non-pharmacological

96

82.8

Refer fearful child for anaesthesia

Never

9

7.8

Rarely

15

12.9

Once in a while

51

44.0

Sometimes

21

18.1

Always

20

17.2

Non-Pharmacological Techniques Used

Tell-Show-Do

63

54.3

Distraction

17

14.7

Positive Reinforcement

10

8.6

Voice Control

8

6.9

Parental Presence or Absence

7

6.0

Desensitization

6

5.2

Modelling

3

2.6

Nonverbal Communication

1

0.9

Restrain/Protective Stabilization

1

0.9

 

Table 5: Preferences for learning behaviour management technique

Parameter

Variable

N

%

Attended any professional courses in the field of dental fear/ care delivery after graduating

None

52

44.8

Yes, a little

46

39.7

Yes, several

18

15.5

Preferred ways to enhance knowledge regarding behaviour management technique usage

Clinical workshops

35

30.2

Formal classes

37

31.9

Inclusion in courses

39

33.6

Others

5

4.3

Willing to participate in clinical workshops

No

30

25.9

Yes

86

74.1

DISCUSSION

The findings of this study showed that about 56.0%of respondents rated their confidence in managing children with dental fear as "fair," suggesting moderate self-efficacy among the dental workforce. This may reflect limited practical exposure or insufficient emphasis on paediatric behaviour management during training. Only a small proportion (5.2%) reported feeling inadequate, indicating that most dentists feel at least somewhat capable, albeit not optimally confident. Undergraduate education appeared to play a crucial role in shaping these attitudes, with 54.3% of participants stating that their training was "just enough." However, 41.4% expressed a desire for more comprehensive instruction, highlighting potential gaps in dental curricula related to behavioural management. The very small proportion of dentists reporting no training or wishing for less (1.7% and 2.6%, respectively) further underscores the general acknowledgment of the importance of BMTs in clinical practice. When evaluating continuing education, it was found that nearly half of the respondents (44.8%) had not attended any postgraduate courses related to dental fear management, while 39.7% had received minimal exposure. Only 15.5% had attended several such courses, suggesting a clear need to promote more structured professional development opportunities in this area. This aligns with earlier studies emphasizing that continuing education significantly enhances dentists’ competence and confidence in managing paediatric patients [18,20]. Encouragingly, the vast majority of participants (91.4%) reported being aware of behaviour management techniques, indicating a generally well-informed cohort. Nevertheless, the gap between awareness and practical application, especially in terms of advanced or less commonly used techniques, remains a concern and warrants targeted training interventions [21]. These findings reinforce the need to integrate both foundational and advanced behavioural management strategies into both undergraduate and postgraduate dental education to better equip practitioners for real-world paediatric care.

 

Although overall awareness of BMTs was high among participants, the data revealed significant variations across key demographic and professional variables. Age emerged as a significant factor, with participants over 40 years old demonstrating substantially higher awareness (31.3%) compared to their younger counterparts (5.0%). This finding suggests that increased clinical exposure and accumulated experience over time may enhance familiarity and competence in utilizing BMTs [22]. It also reflects the potential benefits of experiential learning and continued practice in paediatric dental settings. Qualification level also showed a statistically significant association with awareness. Dentists with postgraduate qualifications in dental specialties reported the highest awareness (26.1%), while those with only undergraduate general dental training demonstrated the lowest (4.3%). Such findings are consistent with earlier literature indicating that postgraduate education significantly contributes to dentists' readiness to implement a broader range of behaviour guidance techniques [23,24].

 

Sector of employment was another significant factor influencing awareness. Dentists working in the public sector reported greater awareness (15.9%) compared to those in private practice (3.8%). This may be attributed to the higher volume of paediatric patients commonly treated in public institutions, offering more opportunities for dentists to engage with and apply various BMTs [25]. Moreover, public sector practitioners may have more access to continuing education initiatives and institutional support for skill development. Other variables including gender, locality, nationality, level of practice, and years of experience, did not show statistically significant associations with awareness. However, there were observable trends indicating slightly higher awareness among hospital-based practitioners and those with more years of experience. These trends, while not statistically significant, suggest that clinical setting and duration of practice may still play a contributory role in shaping familiarity with BMTs and merit further investigation in larger, more diverse samples [26].

 

In this study, most participants reported seeking support for managing dental fear by consulting colleagues (41.4%) or paediatric dentists (28.4%), with minimal reliance on the internet (10.3%), scientific literature (6.0%), or other sources (4.3%). This preference for peer consultation over evidence-based resources may reflect time constraints, accessibility issues, or limited confidence in independently interpreting scientific data, an issue highlighted in previous studies that underscore the need to promote evidence-based practice among general dentists [27,28]. Encouragingly, only 9.5% reported never seeking support, suggesting a generally proactive approach toward clinical uncertainty. In managing appointments for fearful paediatric patients, a substantial proportion reported always (37.1%) or occasionally (36.2%) allowing extra time, which is an essential strategy for reducing anxiety and enhancing cooperation, as supported by Jamali et al. [29]. Likewise, the frequent adjustment of treatment plans indicates flexibility in clinical practice, which is critical for tailoring care to the psychological needs of children [4]. The widespread use of non-pharmacological techniques (82.8%), particularly Tell-Show-Do (54.3%), distraction (14.7%), and positive reinforcement (8.6%), aligns with AAPD recommendations emphasizing these as first-line interventions for behaviour guidance [30]. However, the occasional reliance on general anaesthesia raises questions about possible overuse or inadequate behavioural training, as excessive reliance on pharmacological methods may reflect gaps in confidence or experience in managing uncooperative children through behavioural means [31,32].

 

This study highlights a clear gap between dentists’ awareness of BMTs and their confidence and training in applying them. Although knowledge was high (91.4%), fewer than half felt adequately confident. This mirrors international findings where theoretical awareness often exceeds applied competence [17,18].

 

The association between higher awareness and postgraduate qualifications underscores the role of structured training in building confidence and skills [19]. Similarly, older dentists’ higher awareness suggests that cumulative experience enhances familiarity with diverse techniques [20]. However, reliance on colleagues rather than scientific evidence for guidance reflects limited integration of evidence-based practice, a concern also documented in other Middle Eastern studies [21,22].

 

The reliance on Tell-Show-Do and limited use of advanced techniques indicates underutilization of the full BMT spectrum, as also reported by Aldhilan and Ali in Saudi Arabia [23]. The preference for workshops (74.1%) confirms the need for practical, skills-based continuing education programs.

CONCLUSIONS

Although dentists in Jeddah demonstrated high awareness of paediatric BMTs, confidence and training were suboptimal, particularly among younger and non-specialist practitioners. Structured undergraduate curricula, postgraduate modules, and hands-on workshops are urgently needed to bridge this gap and strengthen non-pharmacological approaches to managing paediatric dental fear.

 

Limitations

This study was underpowered due to a small convenience sample (116 vs. 384). Self-reported responses risk social desirability bias. Attitude measures, though included, were limited to confidence and training adequacy. Additionally, electronic distribution (WhatsApp/email) may have introduced selection bias.

 

Recommendations

 

  • Replicate with a larger, randomly selected sample across regions
  • Incorporate qualitative methods (e.g., interviews) to explore barriers to BMT adoption
  • Develop and evaluate interventional training modules for general dentists
  • Emphasize evidence-based resources over peer reliance.
  • Expand curriculum to cover advanced and culturally tailored BMTs

 

Ethical Statement

The study was approved by the IRB of Batterjee Medical College (Approval No: BMC/IRB/2023/014). Informed consent was obtained electronically, and anonymity was ensured.

REFERENCES

  1. Asokan, S. et al. "Behavior puzzle: Nonpharmacological behavior management." International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry, vol. 18, no. 3, 2025, pp. 348-358. doi:10.5005/jp-journals-10005-3099.
  2. Allen, K.D. et al. "Evaluation of behavior management technology dissemination in pediatric dentistry." Pediatric Dentistry, vol. 12, 1990, pp. 79-82. PMID: 2145657.
  3. McDonald, R.E. et alDentistry for child and adolescent. 8th ed., Mosby - An Imprint of Elsevier, Missouri, 2004, pp. 45-46. https:// www. elsevier. com / books / dentistry - for - the-child-and-adolescent/mcdonald/978-0-323-08545-8.
  4. Adair, S.M. et al. "A survey of members of the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry on their use of behavior management techniques." Pediatric Dentistry, vol. 26, 2004, pp. 159-166. PMID: 15128814.
  5. American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. "Guideline on behavior guidance for the pediatric dental patient." Pediatric Dentistry, vol. 33, 2012, pp. 161-173. https://www.aapd.org/assets/1/7/Behavior-Guidance.pdf.
  6. Roberts, J.F. et al. "Review: Behaviour management techniques in paediatric dentistry." European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry, vol. 11, 2010, pp. 166-174. doi:10.1007/BF03262737.
  7. Carr, K.R. et al. "Behavior management techniques among pediatric dentists in the southeastern United States." Pediatric Dentistry, vol. 21, 1999, pp. 347-353. PMID: 10553244.
  8. Wright, F.A. et al. "A national survey of dentists' management of children with anxiety or behavior problems." Australian Dental Journal, vol. 36, 1991, pp. 378-383. doi:10.1111/j.1834-7819.1991.tb04748.x.
  9. Singh, P. et al. "Reliability and factor analysis of children's fear survey schedule-dental subscale in Indian subjects." Journal of the Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, vol. 28, no. 3, 2010, pp. 151-155. doi:10.4103/0970-4388.70775.
  10. Bajrić, E. et al. "Reliability and validity of the Children's Fear Survey Schedule-Dental Subscale in Bosnia and Herzegovina." Bosnian Journal of Basic Medical Sciences, vol. 11, no. 4, 2011, pp. 214-218. doi:10.17305/bjbms.2011.2704.
  11. Kawia, H.M. et al. "Application of behavior management techniques for paediatric dental patients by Tanzanian dental practitioners." Open Dentistry Journal, vol. 9, 2015, pp. 455-461. doi:10.2174/1874210601509010455.
  12. Paryab, M. and M. Hosseinbor. "Dental anxiety and behavioral problems: A study of prevalence and related factors among a group of Iranian children aged 6-12." Journal of the Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, vol. 31, no. 2, 2013, pp. 82-86. doi:10.4103/0970-4388.115699.
  13. Wogelius, P. et al. "Prevalence of dental anxiety and behavior management problems among Danish children." Acta Odontologica Scandinavica, vol. 61, no. 3, 2003, pp. 178-183. doi:10.1080/00016350310006866.
  14. Nakai, Y. et al. "The Children's Fear Survey Schedule-Dental Subscale in Japan." Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology, vol. 33, no. 3, 2005, pp. 196-204. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0528.2005.00211.x.
  15. Alshoraim, M.A. et al. "Effects of child characteristics and dental history on dental fear: cross-sectional study." BMC Oral Health, vol. 18, no. 1, 2018, 33. doi:10.1186/s12903-018-0496-4.
  16. Juntgen, L.M. et al. "Factors influencing behavior guidance: A survey of practicing pediatric dentists." Pediatric Dentistry, vol. 35, no. 7, 2013, pp. 539-545. PMID: 24320735.
  17. Sharath, A. et al. "Children's behavior pattern and behavior management techniques used in a structured postgraduate dental program." Journal of the Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, vol. 27, 2009, pp. 22-26. doi:10.4103/0970-4388.53108.
  18. Diercke, K. et al. "Dental fear in children and adolescents: A comparison of forms of anxiety management practised by general and paediatric dentists." International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry, vol. 22, no. 1, 2012, pp. 60-67. doi:10.1111/j.1365-263X.2011.01158.x.
  19. Aldhilan, S. and S. Al-Haj Ali. "Approaches used to care for carious primary molars among pediatric dentists and general dental practitioners in Saudi Arabia." Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry, vol. 10, no. 3, 2018, pp. e212-e217. doi:10.4317/jced.54453.
  20. Shindova, M. "Knowledge and attitudes of dental practitioners regarding the use of behaviour management techniques for paediatric dental patients." Folia Medica (Plovdiv), vol. 64, no. 1, 2022, pp. 127-133. doi:10.3897/folmed.64.e64416.
  21. Cohen, C. et al. "Workplace interventions to improve well-being and reduce burnout for nurses, physicians and allied healthcare professionals: A systematic review." BMJ Open, vol. 13, no. 6, 2023, e071203. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071203.
  22. Elendu, C. et al. "The impact of simulation-based training in medical education: A review." Medicine (Baltimore), vol. 103, no. 27, 2024, e38813. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000038813.
  23. Ticku, S. et al. "Behavioral health within primary care postgraduate dental curricula: A mixed methods study." Annals of Family Medicine, vol. 21, suppl. 2, 2023, pp. S4-S13. doi:10.1370/afm.2931.
  24. Mussalo, F. et al. "Exploring dental and oral hygiene students' interprofessional readiness: A cross-sectional study in joint paediatric outreach training." BMC Medical Education, vol. 24, no. 1, 2024, 645. doi:10.1186/s12909-024-05634-5.
  25. Ehizele, A.O. et al. "Culture and behaviour management of children in the dental clinic: A scoping review." Dentistry Journal (Basel), vol. 13, no. 5, 2025, 186. doi:10.3390/dj13050186.
  26. Mattiazzi, S. et al. "Behavioural outcomes of interprofessional education within clinical settings for health professional students: A systematic literature review." Journal of Interprofessional Care, vol. 38, no. 2, 2024, pp. 294-307. doi:10.1080/13561820.2023.2170994.
  27. Kishore, M. et al. "Evidence based dental care: Integrating clinical expertise with systematic research." Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, vol. 8, no. 2, 2014, pp. 259-262. doi:10.7860/JCDR/2014/6595.4076.
  28. Yamalik, N. et al. "Implementation of evidence-based dentistry into practice: Analysis of awareness, perceptions and attitudes of dentists in the World Dental Federation-European Regional Organization zone." International Dental Journal, vol. 65, no. 3, 2015, pp. 127-145. doi:10.1111/idj.12160.
  29. Jamali, Z. et al. "Does the length of dental procedure influence children's behavior during and after treatment? A systematic review and critical appraisal." Journal of Dental Research, Dental Clinics, Dental Prospects, vol. 12, no. 1, 2018, pp. 68-76. doi:10.15171/joddd.2018.011.
  30. American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. "Behavior guidance for the pediatric dental patient." Pediatric Dentistry, vol. 39, 2017, pp. 246-259. https:// www. aapd. org / assets/ 1/ 7/ BP_BehaviorGuidance.pdf.
  31. Wali, A. et al. "Knowledge, attitude, and practices of dental surgeons in managing child patients." International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry, vol. 9, no. 4, 2016, pp. 372-378. doi:10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1388.
  32. Kain, Z.N. et al. "Sensory stimuli and anxiety in children undergoing surgery: A randomized, controlled trial." Anesthesia and Analgesia, vol. 92, no. 4, 2001, pp. 897-903. doi:10.1097/00000539-200104000-00028.
Recommended Articles
Research Article

Comparative Evaluation of Verbal, Printed, and Virtual Reality Approaches for Post-Operative Dental Care Instructions: Perspectives of Patients and Dental Students

...
Published: 05/09/2025
pdf Download PDF
Research Article

The Impact of Oral Health Status on Daily Performances Using the Child-OIDP Index Among 12-14-Year-Old Children in Residential Schools of Bangalore

...
Published: 05/09/2025
pdf Download PDF
Case Report

Interstitial Lung Disease in Dermatomyositis and Polymyositis in Patients from Saudi Arabia: A Single Tertiary Centre Retrospective Report

...
Published: 05/09/2025
pdf Download PDF
Case Report

Clinical profile of Behcet’s Disease patients from Saudi Arabia: A Single Tertiary Centre, Retrospective Report

...
Published: 05/09/2025
pdf Download PDF
Copyright © Journal of Pioneering Medical Sciences until unless otherwise.