Research Article | In-Press | Volume 15 Issue 10 (October, 2026) | Pages 44 - 56

Co-Detection of Low-Risk HPV 6/11 and the Tumor Suppressor Protein pRb in Benign and Malignant Laryngeal Lesions: A Retrospective Molecular Study

1
College of Basic Education, University of Diyala, Iraq
Under a Creative Commons license
Open Access

Abstract

Background: Many low-risk human papillomavirus (lrHPVs) genotypes have been detected in a large number of benign and malignant head and neck lesions using different molecular techniques. The Study Aims: To detect low-risk human papillomavirus (lrHPV) genotypes and investigate their association with the overexpression of the Rb protein. It has been reported that increased rates of lr HPV prevalence and expression of pRb might have possible role in pathogenesis and development of laryngeal lesions. Methods: Various (157) formalin – fixed, paraffin –embedded (FFPE)laryngeal lesions tissue blocks specimens were collected. Molecular detection and genotypes of low-risk human papillomaviruses (lrHPVs) using a modern version of in situ hybridization with type-specific probes, alongside the assessment of Rb protein overexpression via immunohistochemistry. Results: The current results show no statistically significant association between HPV6/11 DNA in situ hybridization (ISH) scores or signal intensity and pRb protein immunohistochemistry (IHC) scores or staining intensity in laryngeal nodules, polyps, or malignant lesions as following; 2(25.0%) in moderate score and high intensity 2 (25.0%) for malignant lesions while in polyps benign lesions in 1 case (25%) in moderate score and high intensity 1 (25%) .In nodules benign lesions, the score was in low and moderate in 1 case (20%) for each whereas the intensity detected in 2 case. Overall, integrated HPV 6/11 DNA signals showed the highest mean percentage in malignant lesions (12.78±23.40%), followed by episomal (3.87±11.44%) and mixed patterns (1.91±8.12%). Integrated patterns showed the highest mean percentage in polyps (10.14±22.90%), whereas episomal patterns showed the highest mean percentage in nodules (6.62±11.10%). Mixed signals were also reported in the control group, although differences among signal patterns in this group were not statistically significant (p = 0.3710). Conclusion: The heterogeneity of HPV6/11 DNA-ISH patterns and pRb expression may reflect underlying cellular and tissue alterations associated with benign and malignant laryngeal lesions. These findings suggest a potential, indirect role of low-risk HPV in laryngeal lesion development; however, the lack of significant associations between HPV 6/11 signals and pRb expression in the lesion groups precludes establishing a causal relationship. Further studies are warranted to clarify the biological significance of these findings.

Keywords
Low risk HPV6/11, Laryngeal Malignant and Benign Lesions,P RB , Signal Patterns, Dr Tamara JPMSCISH, IHC

INTRODUCTION

Globally, Human Papillomaviruses (HPVs) rank among the most widespread viral infections [1]. Over 450 types of Human Papillomaviruses have been identified. HPVs are small viruses, non- enveloped with a circular double strand DNA genome belonging to the Papillomaviridae family and epithelial and mucosal tropic viruses at different anatomical regions across diverse higher vertebrate species, exhibiting species-specific activity that promotes cellular proliferation [2].Virus transmission may occur through direct and skin to skin contact ,particularly during sexual intercourse or other forms of intimate physical contact [3].

 

The clinical manifestation of human papillomavirus (HPV) infection varies substantially according to specific viral genotype and includes benign clinical lesions such as cutaneous and anogenital warts, premalignant abnormalities as intraepithelial neoplasia, and anogenital cancers. Roughly, 70% to 90% of HPV infections are subclinical and lack overt visible clinical signs [4,5]. Depending on its possiple cancer relation, scientist divided them to high oncogenic risk HPVs (HPV16 the most oncogenic type) and low oncogenic risk HPVs [6]. Functional characterization of HPV early gene products E6 and E7 serve pivotal roles in oncogenesis and malignant transformation. High oncogenic risk HPV6 as well as E7 have a high affinity to integrated to host cell genome more than low oncogenic risk E6 and E7 through binding to two tumor suppressor genes P53 and Retinoblastoma RB respectively result in disruption of physiological cell cycle checkpoints and machinery. These transcription factors drive environmental adaptation and organismal survival via gene expression regulation [7].

 

Under environmental stress factors including biotic stressors like freezing, anoxia, dehydration and pathogens the retinoblastoma (Rb)-E2F pathway controls progression of cell cycle [8]. Post-translational alterations of Rb (phosphorylation or acetylation) repress E2F-driven proliferation during metabolic or osmotic stress. Concurrently, canonical cell cycle regulators—including cyclins, CDKs, and checkpoint proteins—detect DNA damage or replication errors to arrest cell division. This review examines the molecular mechanisms governing cell cycle control, highlighting the roles of the Rb-E2F network and Cyclin-CDK complexes in mediating survival under extreme cellular stresss [9].

 

Laryngeal lesions are abnormal growths or tissue changes in the voice box (larynx). They include non-cancerous nodules, polyps, cysts, and inflammatory conditions, as well as pre-cancerous changes and malignant tumors like squamous cell carcinoma [10]. Common signs are hoarseness, throat pain, and breathing changes. These lesions frequently appear on the inferior vocal cords and could exhibit distinct micro vascular features [11].So, the presence study represents an important contribution to understanding the potential role of low risk HPV6,11 in pathogenesis and tumorigenesis of laryngeal malignant and benign lesions in Iraq.

METHODS

Histopathology Tissues Specimens

The study was retrospective one. One hundred and fifty seven archived laryngeal tissue block specimens (formalin fixed, paraffin embedded) were collected randomly from many private laboratories as well as Baghdad medical city and Baqubah learning hospitals . Biopsy specimens of histologically normal- appearing laryngeal tissues that are suspected free from significant pathological changes were retrieved the archival records Forensic Medicine Institute in Baghdad province. All samples assembled during the period from January 2024 till February 2026. The diagnosis were depend on the recoded histopathalogical documents of the corresponding laryngeal lesions blocks after confirmatory histopathalogical re-examination by histopathologist for each obtained tissue blokes. All tissues blocks were subjected to cut as serial thin sections of 4 μm thickness. All tissues were diagnosed based on the original pathology reports stocked on charged slides except one for hematoxylin and eosin examinations for each laryngeal tissues lesions and apparently healthy control tissues. Lesions were classified as benign non-neoplastic lesions, including vocal-fold polyps and nodules, or malignant lesions according to their documented histopathological features. These laryngeal tissue lesions blocks composed of 45 laryngeal malignant lesions ,72 laryngeal benign lesions (35 polyps and 37 nodules) were subjected to laboratory testing.Ages of tissue blocks specimens range from 2 to 83.

 

Methods

Human papillomaviruses DNA were detected and genotyped by advanced molecular chromogenic in situ Hybridization technique employing a cocktail long Digoxigenin-labeled DNA probes (T-1144-400; ZytoVision GmbH, Bremerhaven Kit, Germany) to target specifec DNA sequences in tissue specimens in order to screen HPV genotypes : 6,11,16,18,31,33,35,39,45,51,52,56,58,59,66,68,and 82). Concurrently, low-risk HPV6/11 genotypes were identified using particular DNA probes tagged with Digoxigenin (T-1055-400), ZyoVision GmbH., Bremerhaven, Germany.

 

Methodology

Chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) analysis was conducted in accordance with the protocol and guidelines provided by the manufacturer. Firstly, pre-treatment processes (by dewax, rehydration and proteolysis digestion) ,then the second steps included; Denaturation and Hybridization and the third steps was Post- hybridization and Detection through using Housekeeping gene-specific molecular probes labeled with digoxigenin (DIG) were targeted to elicited reactive staining. Except for the diluted probe, which was omitted from the negative control solution, all reagents were added as specified in the experimental protocol. Within the framework of HPV screening, positive signals [(T-1151-40: ZytoFast Plus Implementation kit AP-Permanent red)] Positive signals were detected as intense bright-red staining with Red Permanent Solution, followed by hematoxylin counterstaining. Whereas the signals detected by CISH for HPV6/11 [(ZytoFast Plus Implementation kitHRP-green: T-1073-40)] were visualized as bright-green staining, with nuclear counterstaining at the sites of complementary sequence hybridization. In situ hybridization signals for the different molecular markers were quantitatively assessed using a light microscope at 10× and 40× magnifications. The number of positive cells was determined by microscopic examination at 1000× magnification. Negative controls processed under the same conditions were used, where available, to assess assay performance and signal specificity. Housekeeping-gene probes, if used, served to assess nucleic acid preservation and assay adequacy. Negative controls were used to assess nonspecific background signals. Control outcomes and predefined criteria for accepting or rejecting assay results were documented. Specimens with inadequate tissue preservation or insufficient control performance were considered uninterpretable according to the laboratory's established criteria.

 

The percentage of positive signals and staining intensity scores, reflecting the proportion of positive cells and the intensity of the staining reaction respectively. It used to detect the in-situ hybridization signals. The staining intensity scores ranged from no staining to high staining. Positive cells were counted in ten randomly selected microscopic fields, with 100 cells evaluated per field. Cases were subsequently classified into three categories according to the Score 1 (1–25%), Score 2 (26–50%), and Score 3 (>50%) [12]. The proportion of positive cells was determined by calculating the mean percentage of positive cells across the ten randomly selected microscopic fields.

 

Immunohistochemically (IHC) staining was performed to evaluate pRB protein overexpression in various laryngeal lesions. The HRP/DAB-based Exposure Detection System for mouse and rabbit antibodies (Abcam, product no. ab80436), in combination with the monoclonal anti-P RB1/2 antibody (EPR7927 ab166611), was used for immunohistochemically staining according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The intensity of pRB staining in the nucleus and cytoplasm was assessed and classified as either high or absent. The staining scores were calculated based on the percentage of cells exhibiting positive reactivity. Specimens exhibiting weak to moderate nuclear staining in 10–75% of cells were assigned a score of +1, whereas specimens showing strong nuclear staining in more than 75% of cells were assigned a score of +2[13]. Specimens lacking nuclear staining were assigned a score of 0. Statistical differences among the variables of interest were assessed using the chi-square test, independent-samples t-test, and analysis of variance (ANOVA), as appropriate.

 

Ethical Certification

Ethical approval, also referred to as ethical clearance, is formal authorization granted by an accredited Research Ethics Committee (REC) or Institutional Review Board (IRB) following an ethical review of the proposed research. Such approval confirms that the study has been designed and conducted in accordance with internationally recognized ethical principles, applicable regulations, and institutional guidelines. For research involving human participants, human-derived biological specimens or data, or laboratory animals, documentation of ethical approval is an essential component of the research process.

 

The permission criteria established by the Institutional review board and local ethics committee permission for the project was obtained and followed. On July, 28, 2026, a local ethics commission accepted this project under project number CEPEC/12 after reviewing and approving the study protocol and subject information.

 

Statistical Analysis

The Chi-square test, T test, ANOVA test and Tukey's multiple comparisons test were used to evaluate the variables under investigation in this study. The SPSS software, Version 24, was used for the statistical analyzes, and a p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Age Distribution Across the Study Groups

The overall age distribution of the research participants and control groups that underwent larngectomy or endoscopic biopsy. Table 1 presents the selected demographic characteristics of the study patients tissues and the control groups.

 

Table 1: Age Distribution Across the Study Groups

Age Groups

N

Mean±SD

SE

Range

p-value

Min

Max

Control

40

27.25±17.15

2.71

2.0

66.0

<0.0001 **

Nodule

37

42.49±13.03

2.14

20.0

75.0

Polyp

35

40.57±18.39

3.11

8.0

75.0

Malignant

45

56.91±17.12

2.55

8.0

83.0

 

In regard to correlation age with study groups, all groups ages range from 2-83 years with range and mean age of each group as following; control group; 2-66 (27.25±17.15), nodule group; 20-75(42.49±13.03), polyp group; 8-75 (40.57±18.39), malignant group 8-83(56.91± 17.12)]. Patients tissues groups and controls group showed statically high significant differences (p<0.0001 ). Also highly significant differences when used Tukey's multiple comparisons test among study groups except between polyp and nodule groups p = 0.9612 (Table 2).

 

Table 2: Tukey's Multiple Comparisons Test

Tukey's Multiple Comparisons Test

Below threshold?

Summary

Adjusted p-Value

Control vs. Nodule

Yes

**

0.0005

Control vs. Polyp

Yes

**

0.0037

Control vs. Malignant

Yes

**

<0.0001

Nodule vs. Polyp

No

ns

0.9612

Nodule vs. Malignant

Yes

**

0.0008

Polyp vs. Malignant

Yes

**

0.0001

** p < 0.01

 

Gender Distribution Across the Study Groups

From Table 3, the gender distribution results among study groups that underwent laryngeal lesions reveled higher percentage of male more than female with statically differences (p<0.0130) as in following groups male; malignant, polyp, nodule and control 39(86.67%),20 (57.14%),27 (72.97%),24 (60.0%) higher than female 6 (13.33%), 15 (42.86%),10 (27.03%), 16 (40.0%) respectively.

 

Table 3: Gender Distribution Across the Study Groups

Gender

No. (Percentage)

Chi-square

p-Value

Control

Nodule

Polyp

Malignant

10.78

0.0130 *

Male

24 (60.0%)

27 (72.97%)

20 (57.14%)

39 (86.67%)

Female

16 (40.0%)

10 (27.03%)

15 (42.86%)

6 (13.33%)

Total

40 (100%)

37 (100%)

35 (100%)

45 (100%)

*p<0.05

 

Distribution of LrHPV6/11 DNA-ISH Signal Intensities

The present results of positive -ISH signal of intensity for LrHPV-DNA was reported high staining intensity percentage in malignant group, polyps group, nodules group and control group 13/45 (28.9%), 8/35 (22.9%), 7/37 (19%) and 1/40 (2.5%) respectively, with no intensity staining signal in the same groups 32/45 (71.1%), 27/35 (77.1%), 30/37 (81%) and 39/40 (97.5%) respectively. Significant differences were found among groups (X² = 10.47, p = 0.0150) as Table 4.

 

Table 4: Distribution of Signal Intensities HPV6/11 DNA-Positive Cases among the Studied Groups, as Detected by in Situ Hybridization (ISH).

Intensity

No. (Percentage)

Chi-square

p Value

Control

Nodule

Polyp

Malignant

10.47

0.0150 *

High

1 (2.5%)

7 (19%)

8 (22.9%)

13 (28.9%)

No Intensity

39 (97.5%)

30 (81%)

27 (77.1%)

32 (71.1%)

Total

40 (100%)

37 (100%)

35 (100%)

45 (100%)

 

Distribution of LrHPV6/11 DNA-ISH signal scores

The distribution of positive ISH staining signal scores for LR-HPV DNA varied across the study group, In the malignant group, high staining scores were observed in 8 cases (17.78%), moderate scores in 3 (6.67%), and low scores in 2 (4.44%). In the polyp group, 5 cases (14.29%) showed high scores, 1 (2.86%) showed a moderate score, and 2 (5.71%) showed low scores. In the nodule group, high scores were observed in 4 cases (10.81%) and low scores in 3 (8.11%), with no cases classified as moderate. Among controls, 39 specimens (97.5%) were negative, while 1 (2.5%) showed a moderate score. The reported differences among the four groups were not statistically significant (χ² = 14.63, p = 0.1015), as shown in Table 5.

 

Table 5: Distribution of Signal scores HPV6/11 DNA-Positive Cases among the Studied Groups, as Detected by in Situ Hybridization (ISH)

Score

No. (Percentage)

Chi-square

p-Value

Control

Nodule

Polyp

Malignant

14.63

0.1015 NS

-ve

39 (97.5%)

30 (81.08%)

27 (77.14%)

32 (71.11%)

Low

0 (0.0%)

3 (8.11%)

2 (5.71%)

2 (4.44%)

Moderate

1 (2.5%)

0 (0.0%)

1 (2.86%)

3 (6.67%)

High

0 (0.0%)

4 (10.81%)

5 (14.29%)

8 (17.78%)

Total

40 (100%)

37 (100%)

35 (100%)

45 (100%)

 

Distribution of LrHPV6/11 DNA-ISH Signal Patterns (Integrated, Episomal and Mixed)

The presence of low-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA in laryngeal lesions was investigated using histological specimens. Low-risk HPV DNA was detected at a significantly higher frequency in laryngeal malignant tissues following by polyps and nodules groups with absent of integrated and episomal signal pattern in control group that is indicating a significant association between low-risk HPV infection and laryngeal malignancy. The HPV-DNA signals detected by in situ hybridization (ISH) appeared as distinct red-colored signals within the nuclei, corresponding to the sites of complementary HPV-DNA sequences. The distribution of LR-HPV 6/11 DNA signal patterns varied among the different lesion groups. In malignant lesions, the integrated signal pattern showed the highest mean percentage, at 12.78±23.40 (range: 0–80%), followed by the episomal pattern, at 3.87±11.44 (range: 0–50%), and the mixed pattern, at 1.91±8.12 (range: 0–50%). The differences among the three signal patterns were statistically significant (p = 0.0030). Similarly, in polyp lesions, the integrated pattern exhibited the highest mean percentage, at 10.14±22.90 (range: 0–70%), followed by the episomal pattern, at 1.43±5.89 (range: 0–25%). No mixed signal pattern was observed in this group. The differences among the signal patterns were statistically significant (p = 0.0046). In nodule lesions, the episomal pattern showed the highest mean percentage, at 6.62±11.10 (range: 0–40%), followed by the integrated pattern, at 2.84±10.96 (range: 0–60%), and the mixed pattern, at 0.14±0.82 (range: 0–5%). These differences were statistically significant (p = 0.0097). In the control group, only the mixed pattern showed a non-zero mean percentage, at 1.25±7.91 (range: 0–50%), whereas the integrated and episomal patterns had mean percentages of 0.00±0.00. However, the differences among the three signal patterns in the control group were not statistically significant (p = 0.3710) as in Table 6.

 

Table 6: Distribution of HPV 6/11 Signal Patterns According to Their Mean Values and Ranges in Laryngeal Lesions Tissue Samples

Group

SP Percentage

N

Mean±SD

SE

Range

p-value

Min

Max

Control

Integrated

40

0.0±0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.3710 NS

Episomal

40

0.0±0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

Mixed

40

1.25±7.91

1.25

0.0

50.0

Nodule lesions

Integrated

37

2.84±10.96

1.80

0.0

60.0

0.0097 **

Episomal

37

6.62±11.10

1.82

0.0

40.0

Mixed

37

0.14±0.82

0.14

0.0

5.0

Polyp lesions

Integrated

35

10.14±22.9

3.87

0.0

70.0

0.0046 **

Episomal

35

1.43±5.89

1.00

0.0

25.0

Mixed

35

0.0±0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

Malignant lesions

Integrated

45

12.78±23.4

3.49

0.0

80.0

0.0030 **

Episomal

45

3.87±11.44

1.71

0.0

50.0

Mixed

45

1.91±8.12

1.21

0.0

50.0

 

Comparison of HPV 6/11 DNA-ISH Signal and pRB-IHC Expression among the Studied Groups

LR-HPV6/11DNA/pRB protein -IHC scores: In patients with laryngeal malignancie, Positive HPV 6/11 DNA-infected cells demonstrated detectable ISH staining signals and positive pRB immunoreactivity was noticed in 2/45 case (25.0%) in moderate score. Conversely, absent staining was exhibit in 26/45cases (70.3%). Within benign polyp’s tissue cases demonstrated positive lrHPV6/11 DNA–pRB IHC staining, with moderate score (++) staining noted in 1/35 case (25.0%), while absent staining was recorded in 24/35 cases (77.4 %). Laryngeal benign nodules, positive moderate score (++) and low score (+) staining for lrHPV6/11 DNA–pRB IHC signal were identified in 1/37 case (20.0%) and 1/37 case (20.0%), respectively, whereas negative staining was recorded in 25/37 cases (84.4%). Finally, regarding non-tumor control tissues which appeared normal upon gross examination low-score staining (+) for low-risk human papillomavirus (lrHPV6/11) DNA and pRB protein was observed in one case /40(33.3%), whereas absent staining results were recorded in 29/40 cases (100%). Statistical analysis revealed significant differences just in control group amongthe studied groups (p<0.01), as shown in Table 7.

 

Table.7: Comparison of HPV 6/11 DNA-ISH Signal Scores and pRB-IHC Expression Scores among the Studied Groups

Studied Groups

Rb scores

Pearson Chi-Square (p-value)

Negative

+

A.H. Control

HPV6 / 11 scores

Negative

No.

37

2

p = 0.00 Highly Sign. (p<0.01)

%

100.0%

66.7%

+

No.

0

1

%

0.0%

33.3%

Total

No.

37

3

%

100.0%

100.0%

Nodules lesions

HPV6 / 11 scores

Negative

No.

27

3

p = 0.411 Non Sign. (p>0.05)

%

84.4%

60.0%

+

No.

2

1

%

6.2%

20.0%

++

No.

3

1

%

9.4%

20.0%

Total

No.

32

5

%

100.0%

100.0%

Polyps lesions

HPV6 / 11 scores

Negative

No.

24

3

p = 0.809 Non Sign. (p>0.05)

%

77.4%

75.0%

+

No.

2

0

%

6.5%

0.0%

++

No.

5

1

%

16.1%

25.0%

Total

No.

31

4

%

100.0%

100.0%

Malignant lesions

HPV6 / 11 scores

Negative

No.

26

6

p = 0.797 Non Sign. (p>0.05)

%

70.3%

75.0%

+

No.

2

0

%

5.4%

0.0%

++

No.

9

2

%

24.3%

25.0%

Total

No.

37

8

%

100.0%

100.0%

S* = Significant, NS*: Non-Significant

 

LR-HPV6/11DNA/pRB protein -IHC Intensities

Strong staining signal intensity of LR-HPV 6/11 DNA-positive infected cells in relation to PRB were observed in two/45 cases (25.0%), while no staining signal were detected in 26/45(70.3%) cases with laryngeal malignant tumors. In the laryngeal polyp group, strong staining intensity for (LRHPV 6/11) DNA/PRB protein -IHC expression was recorded in one/35 case (25.0%), whereas no staining signal was found in 24/35 cases (77.4%). In the laryngeal nodule group, strong positive staining intensity was noted in two/37 cases (40.0%), while no staining signal was observed in 27/37 cases (84.4%). In apparently healthy individuals (control group), strong positive staining intensity was observed in one/40 case (33.3%), while no staining signal was detected in 37/40 cases (100%)of control group in regard to lrHPV 6/11 DNA/pRB-IHC. Statistical analysis revealed no significant differences among the studied groups p (> 0.05) except control group (p = 0.0) as in Table 8, the HPV 6/11 intensity categories were dichotomized into no intensity and high intensity by combining the positive score categories (+ and ++), as defined in the study scoring protocol.

 

Table 8: Comparison of HPV 6/11 DNA-ISH Signal Intensities and pRB-IHC Expression Intenseties among the Studied Groups

Studied Groups

Rb intensity

Pearson Chi-Square (p-value)

No Intensity

High intensity

A.H. Control

HPV6 / 11 intensity

No Intensity

No.

37

2

p = 0.00 Highly Sign. (p<0.01)

%

100.0%

66.7%

High intensity

No.

0

1

%

0.0%

33.3%

Total

No.

37

3

%

100.0%

100.0%

Nodules Lesions

HPV6 / 11 intensity

No Intensity

No.

27

3

p = 0.196 Non Sign. (p>0.05)

%

84.4%

60.0%

High intensity

No.

5

2

%

15.6%

40.0%

Total

No.

32

5

%

100.0%

100.0%

Polyps lesions

HPV6 / 11 intensity

No Intensity

No.

24

3

p = 0.914 Non Sign. (p>0.05)

%

77.4%

75.0%

High intensity

No.

7

1

%

22.6%

25.0%

Total

No.

31

4

%

100.0%

100.0%

Malignant lesions

HPV6 / 11 intensity

No Intensity

No.

26

6

p = 0.789 Non Sign. (p>0.05)

%

70.3%

75.0%

High Intensity

No.

11

2

%

29.7%

25.0%

Total

No.

37

8

%

100.0%

100.0%

S* = Significant, NS*: Non-Significant

DISCUSSION

Laryngeal lesions can develop across all age groups; however, their histopathological and clinical characteristics vary substantially with age and stage of life [14]. Laryngeal carcinoma is an invasive malignant neoplasm arising from the epithelial tissues of the larynx, characterized by progressive cellular proliferation and local tissue infiltration. It constitutes a significant proportion of head and neck malignancies, accounting for approximately 1–5% of cancers encountered within otolaryngology practice [15]. The pathogenesis of laryngeal carcinoma is influenced by multiple well-established risk factors, with tobacco exposure, alcohol consumption, and long-term occupational exposure to carcinogenic agents representing the principal contributors [16,17]. Human papillomavirus (HPV) infection is associated with various benign and malignant upper respiratory tract lesions and may contribute to cellular transformation and tumorigenesis. Laryngeal tumors associated with High and Low oncogenic risk HPV genotypes such as 16,18,6,11 respectively [18]. In laryngeal tumors particularly laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC) the retinoblastoma protein (pRB) functions as a key regulator of the cell cycle and a tumor suppressor; alterations in its expression levels or its dysfunction via viral pathways play a pivotal role in tumorigenesis, the determination of patient prognosis, and the response to treatment [19].

 

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study in Iraq to investigate the association between LR-HPV 6/11 gene products and pRB expression using CISH and IHC, respectively, in archived FFPE laryngeal tissues from benign and malignant lesions.

 

Age and Gender Distribution among Patients with Benign and Malignant Laryngeal Lesions

In the present study, as demonstrated in Table 1, the age of the study participants ranged from 8.0 to 83.0 years. Patients with malignant laryngeal tumors had a mean age of 56.91±17.12 years, which was significantly higher than that observed among patients with benign laryngeal lesions, including polyps and nodules. The mean age of patients with benign lesions was within the fourth decade of life whereas in control group was 27.25±17.15 with range age 2-66 years. While gender findings showed males proportion was higher than female proportion in all study groups (control, nodules, polyps and malignant as following male /female 24(60.0%)/16(40.0%), 27(72.97%)/10(27.03), 20(56.14%)/ 15(42.86%) and 39(86.67%)/ 6(13.333%) with highly statically differences among groups.

 

The age distribution observed in the present study is in agreement with findings reported by several previous studies, as demonstrated by Ghosh et al.,(2023)who found the highest frequency of age over 50 years in patents with HRHPV infection in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of larynx[20].Also consist with Shalarah et al. who evaluate the role of p53,p16 and cyclinD1 as well as detection of HPV in patient with laryngeal SCC, found increased laryngeal cancer with age range from 31-80 and in mean age (58.93 ± 11.18) years[21]. Gomaa and his college's (2017) found the age range of patients infected with HPV and undergo laryngeal cancer was 38 – 70 years old with mean 57.06 years that consist with the present study [22]. Also agreed with Megahed et al. study that showed the range and mean of age were 43-73 and 56.9 ±7.2) respectively in patients with HPV and different grades of laryngeal cancer [23]. And disagreed with many studies that carried to detect different types of HPV infections in laryngeal cancers in Nassef et al. who found the range and mean of age from 42-76 and (60.8± 9.8) years respectively in 8%of biopsies taken from the tumor sites and no HPV was detected in biopsies taken from normal tissues [24]. The present investigation compatible with Jiang et al. whom use PCR technique to detect HPV types including low risk HPV genotypes 6 and 22 found range and median age were 36-78 and 65 years old in patients with positive HPV16 and laryngeal SCC [25]. Also the current study in line with Laskaris et al. that showed the LSSC increased with age and the range and mean of patients age were from 21-88 and (62.6) respectively when detect HPV DNA infection in Greek patients with SCC of larynx [26]. In addition to the aforementioned prior studies, the current study aligns with those of Gallus et al. and Vazquez-Guillen et al. which identified the presence of Human papillomavirus (HPV) in cases of laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma in separate studies, the range and mean of both studies 39.88.5 (64.2)and 34-89(64) years [27,28].In regard to laryngeal malignancy, reported that percentage of male higher than female as in [20-28].

 

In regard of age distribution of benign tumor (Polyps and Nodules), the range and mean of this study were in 8-75 and 40 years respectively. The present study concordant with Iravani et al. study that reported range and mean of patients with (HPV) DNA in benign laryngeal lesions were 18-80((40.57) years [29]. Also match with study of Brooks et al. and Ikegami et al. Studies have shown that the age range and mean age of individuals diagnosed with laryngeal papilloma and human papillomavirus (HPV) ranged from 44 years to over 60 years [30,31]. The present study also in accordance with Omland et al.(2014)and Hirakawa et al. reported the age of patients was matched forties [32,33].This finding in disagreement with many studies as Manjarrez et al. who found most laryngeal papillomatosis samples contain low-risk HPV determined by both PCR and in situ PCR with age range from (5-15) years [34].Reccurrent laryngeal squamous in Mujic et al. who identified HPV DNA and in laryngeal lesions in Northeast Bosnia and Herzegovina with range and median age from 39-80(61) years [35]. Allstudy above demonstrated that male prominence more than female [29-35].

 

The observed differences in age distribution among patients with various laryngeal lesions may be attributable to the distinct biological and etiological characteristics of these lesions. In malignant laryngeal tumors, the higher age observed in affected patients may partly reflect the cumulative effects of prolonged exposure to established carcinogens, particularly tobacco smoke, alcohol, and occupational agents, which may progressively contribute to cellular and genomic damage over time [36,37]. Furthermore, aging is associated with the gradual accumulation of somatic DNA damage and genomic alterations, together with alterations in immune function known as immunosenescence [38] The decline in immune surveillance with advancing age may impair the recognition and elimination of abnormal cells, thereby facilitating the accumulation and persistence of potentially malignant cellular changes [39]. Conversely, the occurrence of benign HPV-associated laryngeal lesions across younger and older age groups may reflect differences in the timing of HPV acquisition, host immune responses, and the biological behavior of individual lesions. Recurrent respiratory papillomatosis, for example, demonstrates a heterogeneous age-of-onset pattern, with distinct pediatric and adult peaks, supporting the influence of age-related and host-specific factors on lesion development [40-42].

 

In term of gender distribution across present study groups, Although the underlying factors contributing to the increased incidence and observed sex disparity remain incompletely understood, several potential determinants may account for these differences [43].

 

The pronounced male predominance observed in laryngeal lesions that include malignant and benign tumors were likely multifactorial. It may partly reflect the historically higher prevalence and intensity of tobacco smoking and alcohol consumption among men, both of which are well-established risk factors for laryngeal cancer and may exert synergistic effects when combined [44]. Furthermore, differences in occupational patterns may contribute to this sex disparity, as certain male-dominated occupations involve exposure to potentially carcinogenic agents, including polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, engine exhaust, textile dust, and silica. Collectively, differences in lifestyle and occupational exposure between men and women may partly explain the higher burden of laryngeal cancer among males [44,45].

 

Papillomavirus-Associated Laryngeal Lesions

Distribution of Signal scores HPV6/11 DNA-Positive Cases among the Studied Groups, as Detected by In Situ Hybridization (ISH): In present study results of positive – CISH signal high intensity and high score for LR-HPVDNA were (28.9%)and score in 8 cases (17.78%) in laryngeal malignancy ,while in benign lesions (Polyps and Nodules ) was 8cases(22.9%) and 7cases (19%)with high score in5 cases (14.29%)and 4 cases (10.81%) respectively as showed in Table 3 and Table 4.

 

A review of the available literature revealed no studies specifically assessing staining intensity and score signal of HPV6/11DNA in benign and malignant laryngeal lesions, either independently or in combination, across the different detection methodologies employed. However, several previous studies have reported the detection of HPV types 6 and 11, showing findings broadly consistent with those of the present study, the findings of the present study are consistent with those reported by Abdulsamad et al. who detected HPV 6/11 DNA in 30% of both benign and malignant laryngeal masses. In addition, approximately 26% of non-neoplastic laryngeal lesions, predominantly polyps, showed positive HPV immunohistochemical staining [46]. These results are in line with those of Sun et al., who demonstrated that HPV-6/11 DNA positivity was markedly higher in laryngeal papilloma (33.3%) than in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (9.6%), a difference that was statistically significant (p<0.0005) [47].The findings of the present study are broadly consistent with those reported by Brooks et al., who investigated HPV-6 and HPV-11 in recurrent laryngeal squamous papillomas using PCR, dot-blot hybridization, and in situ hybridization (ISH). HPV-11 was detected in 2/10 (20.0%) juvenile-onset cases compared with 5/11 (45.5%) adult-onset cases, whereas HPV-6 was detected in 7/10 (70.0%) juvenile cases and 5/11 (45.5%) adult cases. These findings indicate age-related differences in the distribution of HPV genotypes, with HPV-11 occurring more frequently among adults and HPV-6 predominating among juvenile cases [30]. The present findings are also comparable with those of Iravani et al. who detected HPV DNA in 23.1% of laryngeal polyps and 7.7% of lesions classified as other benign laryngeal lesions, including nodules and cysts, using PCR [29]. Similarly, Ghallab et al. reported HPV-6 DNA in 34% of adult vocal fold polyps; among patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux, HPV-6 positivity reached 44.11%, compared with 12.5% among those without reflux [48].

 

In contrast, the present results differ from those reported by Manjarrez et al. who found the prevalence of HPV6 and HPV11were 60% and 30% respectively in non- malignant laryngeal tissues and it constitute an important risk factor in laryngeal papilloma [49], Hirakawa et al., who detected HPV DNA in 28 of 30 (92.9%) patients with laryngeal papilloma. Among HPV-positive cases, HPV-6 accounted for 89.3%, whereas HPV-11 represented 10.7%. HPV detection and genotyping were performed using molecular methods, while immunohistochemistry was used to assess p16, p21, p53, and Ki-67 expression [33]. The discrepancy between the present study and these previous reports may be related to differences in study populations, lesion characteristics, sample size, geographic variation, and, importantly, differences in HPV detection, lesion types, age at disease onset, geographical distribution, clinical course. and genotyping methodologies including specimen type and sampling site, tissue fixation and preservation, viral load, DNA quality, and the sensitivity and specificity of the molecular assay employed. In particular, differences in PCR primers or ISH probes, the genomic region targeted, and the analytical method used may result in considerable variation in HPV6/11 detection rates. [33-35]. Also, the discrepancies among studies may be partly explained the handling of both HPV6/11 co-infections or with other types of HPV types .Another explanation ,may further contribute to the observed discrepancies. indirect evidence supporting the progressive nature of laryngeal keratosis, particularly observations related to the latency period of HPV infection. The duration of HPV latency may be an important determinant of the timing of initial diagnosis and may contribute to understanding the subsequent progression of laryngeal lesions toward carcinoma [49]. Recurrent benign laryngeal papillomtous lesions most commonly arise in the vocal cords and may extend to other respiratory tract sites, with a clinical course ranging from persistent or latent HPV infection to, in some cases, dysplastic or malignant transformation. They typically originate at the junction of squamous and respiratory epithelium or in areas of squamous metaplasia. HPV DNA detection may be considered in laryngeal mucosal lesions, particularly among patients with prolonged tobacco and alcohol exposure [50].

 

Distribution of HPV 6/11 Signal Patterns Form According to Their Mean Values and Ranges in Laryngeal Lesions Tissue Samples

As in Table 5 Showed the range and mean percentage of LR-HPV 6/11 DNA exhibiting an integrated pattern were {0-80 (12.78±23.4)} whereas range and mean percentage of episomal signal patterns were {0-50 (3.87±11.44)} then mix signal patterns range and mean were {0-50(1.91±8.12)}. In polyp’s lesions, the range and mean percentage of LR-HPV 6/11 DNA exhibiting an integrated pattern were {0-70 (10.14±22.9)} whereas range and mean percentage of episomal signal patterns were {0-25 (1.43±5.89)} and no mixed signal pattern. While in nodule lesions, The range and mean percentage of LR-HPV 6/11 DNA showed an episomal pattern were {0-40 (6.62±11.10)} higher than integrated and mixed pattern {0-60(2.84±10.96)} and {0-5.0(0.14±0.82)} respectively. Whereas in control group, noted absence of integrated and episomal signal pattern of HPV6/11 DNA.

 

Although comparative studies documenting human papillomavirus (HPV) integration patterns with the host cell chromosome specifically regarding whether the virus integrates, episomal, or mixed patterns within the laryngeal lesions examined in the current study (whether malignant or benign, including polyps and nodules) are scarce, other relevant studies address various benign laryngeal growths and lesions (such as recurrent respiratory papillomatosis) as well as malignant lesions. Notably, the study conducted by Brooks et al. aligns closely with the point you aim to establish in your thesis; the researchers examined 35 samples of laryngeal papillomas from both children and adults, utilizing initial and subsequent samples from recurrent cases for comparison. This punctate pattern(integrated) was observed in 7/10 (70%) of juvenile-onset cases and 7/11 (63.6% ) of adult-onset cases, as well as in progressive and recurrent disease there for the authors concluded that low-risk HPV integration may be an early and common event in recurrent laryngeal papillomatosis [30].Also the present study highly relevant to study of Huiberts et al. which demonstrated the integration of HPV6 and down regulation of AKR1C3 expression and probable malignant transformation in patient witn juvenile-onset laryngeal papillomatosis episomal patterns The patient suffered from juvenile-onset recurrent respiratory papillomatosis (RRP) since childhood, which later progressed to laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma; HPV6 was detected in both the initial papilloma and the subsequent carcinoma. FISH analysis revealed a diffuse pattern in the papilloma consistent with episomal HPV6, whereas the carcinoma exhibited a single-point integration signal. Furthermore, APOT-PCR and sequencing identified an HPV6–host fusion transcript, mapping the integration site to the AKR1C3 gene at 10p15.1 [51]. Although the study conducted by Lele et al. did not directly demonstrate the occurrence of integration, it detected the presence of human papillomavirus type 11 (HPV11) in lesions ranging from papilloma and dysplasia to carcinoma; the researchers concluded that infection with this virus might be an early event associated with the progression of recurrent respiratory papillomatosis (RRP) to cancer. While this finding supports the hypothesis of an early origin of the infection, this study should not be cited in isolation to substantiate that hypothesis [52]. A study by Reddy et al. examined nine cases of recurrent respiratory papillomatosis (RRP) originating in the larynx or trachea. Human papillomavirus 11 (HPV11) was detected in the tumors, and where sufficient RNA was available evidence of viral integration was found in three out of seven cases. Thus, these findings support the presence of integrated HPV11 in malignancies associated with recurrent respiratory papillomatosis [53].

 

In contrast, Deng et al. studied 18 samples obtained from 11 patients with adult-onset laryngeal papilloma. Human papillomavirus type 6 (HPV6) was detected in 9 of these patients; 15 samples showed the virus in an episomal (extrachromosomal) state with an intact E2 gene, and no integrated viral sequences were found [54]. Furthermore, a multi-omics study by Sievers et al. did not detect HPV-host fusion transcripts in recurrent respiratory papillomatosis samples despite HPV fusions having been identified in certain high-risk head and neck cancers and concluded that HPV-6/11 in recurrent respiratory papillomatosis appears to be predominantly extra chromosomal [55].

 

The relationship between HPV6/11 infection and the development of benign and malignant laryngeal lesions can be better understood by considering the normal organization and differentiation of the laryngeal epithelium. The larynx contains different epithelial phenotypes according to anatomical location. The mechanically exposed vocal folds are predominantly lined by stratified squamous non-keratinizing epithelium, whereas much of the supraglottic and infraglottic mucosa is lined by respiratory-type pseudostratified ciliated epithelium. Transitional areas and foci of squamous metaplasia may also occur, producing epithelial environments in which HPV infection can be established [56]. Basal cells of both squamous and respiratory-type epithelia express markers such as p63 and integrin-α6, consistent with their proliferative and progenitor-like properties. Experimental and pathological observations suggest that HPV can infect immature laryngeal epithelial cells even in the absence of a classical squamo-columnar junction, while squamous metaplasia of respiratory epithelium may provide an additional permissive environment for papilloma development. E1 functions primarily as the viral replication initiator/helicase, while E2 regulates viral transcription and replication and contributes to the partitioning and maintenance of viral episomes in dividing cells. The continued presence of viral episomes in proliferating basal cells is therefore crucial for persistence and recurrence. Experimental work with HPV11 demonstrates that both E6 and E7 also contribute to stable episomal maintenance, indicating that the functions of these proteins in low-risk HPV infection extend beyond simple transformation [57]. Therefore, the physical status of low-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) types 6 and 11 in laryngeal lesions may occur in episomal, integrated, or mixed episomal/integrated forms. The relative contribution of each viral state to the development of benign laryngeal papillomas and their occasional progression to malignancy remains incompletely understood. Current evidence suggests that HPV6/11 is predominantly maintained as episomal DNA in benign laryngeal papillomas, whereas viral integration has been documented in a subset of malignant lesions. Nevertheless, the detection of integrated viral DNA in some benign lesions indicates that integration may occur before overt malignant transformation in selected case.From the present finding and discrepancy of related other studies findings of signal patterns of HPV6/11DNA ,it suggest the possibility of HPV6/11 integration at an early stage of papilloma development and the accumulation of cellular mutations could transform to malignant statement under certain conditions[54,58].

 

LR-HPV6/11DNA/pRB protein –IHC

The hypothesis of this retrospective study aimed to analyze the co-localization of low risk human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA specifically types 6 and 11 with pRb protein expression levels in archived samples.

 

From table 6 and 7. Showed comparison of HPV 6/11 DNA-ISH signal and pRB-IHC expression scores and intensities in study groups as following; 2(25.0%) in moderate score and high intensity 2 (25.0%) for malignant tumor while in polyps benign tumor in 1 case (25%) in moderate score and high intensity 1 (25%) .in nodules benign tumor ,the score was in low and moderate in 1 case (20%) for each whereas the intensity detected in 2 case (40%).

 

Unfortunately, we did not find studies in the scientific literature that precisely quantify the score and intensity of signal staining associated with the co-presence of human papillomavirus (HPV)6/11 DNA and the tumor-suppressor protein Rb using the specific method described in the current study; however, there are studies closely related to this one.

 

The present study aligns with the findings of Manjarez et al. regarding low-risk human papillomavirus (specifically HPV-6/11) in laryngeal papilloma and laryngeal carcinoma assessed via in situ hybridization and PCR, in conjunction with pRb measurement via immunohistochemistry (IHC). It was determined that pRb levels were highest in papilloma compared to normal tissue and carcinoma, dropping to their lowest level in the carcinoma cases [34], while in Deng et al. found 9 of 11 patients was HPV-positive adult-onset laryngeal papilloma ( AO-LP) and pRb positivity was observed in 3 out of 7 cases (42.9%); the case that progressed to carcinoma was pRb-negative. Additionally, no positive result for episomal HPV6 was detected [54].

 

In contrast, Vazquez‑Guillen ertal .,2023 study findings match with present study findings who found Among 103 tumor samples of laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma, 32 samples (56.1%) tested positive for human papillomavirus (HPV), while 78 samples (75.7%) showed positive expression of the pRb protein; a higher rate of this expression was observed in HPV-negative samples (87.0%; p = 0.021) and in samples negative for high-risk viral strains (85.2%; p = 0.010) [28].

 

Many investigators hypnotized that multiple viral infections could exert synergistic effects that enhance epithelial hyperplasia and facilitate the accumulation of premalignant genetic alterations, potentially accelerating their progression to malignancy [59]. The current results show no statistically significant association between HPV (types 6 and 11) DNA in situ hybridization (ISH) scores or signal intensity and pRb protein immunohistochemistry (IHC) scores or staining intensity in laryngeal nodules, polyps, or malignant lesions. Notably, strong HPV (6/11) DNA signals were observed in the malignant tumor group at very similar rates between pRb-negative and pRb-positive cases (24.3% and 25.0%, respectively). This finding does not support the existence of a consistent inverse relationship between HPV (6/11) viral load and pRb protein expression levels. From a biological perspective, this can be explained by the distinct behavior of low-risk human papillomavirus HPV6 and 11 compared with that of high-risk HPV16 and 18. Although the E7 proteins of HPV6 and 11 are capable of interacting with the retinoblastoma protein family, their effects on the pRb protein are significantly weaker than those of the E7 proteins in high-risk types, whereas their impact on the p130 protein is more pronounced [60]. Consequently, observing pRb protein expression in cells harboring types 6 and 11 does not necessarily rule out dysfunction in the Rb pathway. Signals associated with HPV 6 and 11 detected via in situ hybridization (DNA-ISH/CISH) in certain lesions may suggest focal viral integration; however, these signals should be interpreted as indicators rather than definitive evidence of chromosomal integration, as directly demonstrating the linkage of viral DNA to the host genome requires molecular techniques such as integration-specific PCR or sequencing [61]. Previous studies have indicated the presence of HPV 6 and 11 in an apparently integrated state within a sample of benign and malignant laryngeal lesions. Brooks and colleagues interpreted the punctate in situ hybridization patterns observed in recurrent laryngeal papilloma tumors as an indication of viral integration, suggesting that integration may occur at an early stage [30]. In contrast, Reidy and colleagues identified both episomal and integrated HPV11 in histologically benign papillomatous lesions, whereas only integrated HPV11 was detected in malignant tissues, accompanied by additional alterations in p53 and IFN-β proteins [53]. Furthermore, Huebbers and colleagues provided direct molecular evidence of HPV6 integration into the host AKR1C3 gene in a laryngeal carcinoma that developed following the early onset of recurrent respiratory papillomatosis (RRP), whereas the preceding papilloma had harbored episomal HPV6 [51]. In contrast, a comprehensive multi-omics analysis of recurrent respiratory papillomatosis (RRP) conducted by Sievers et al. failed to identify fusion transcripts between human papillomavirus (HPV) 6/11 and the host genome, supporting the predominance of an extrachromosomal viral state in benign RRP [55]. Collectively, these findings suggest that HPV 6/11 may exist in extrachromosomal, mixed, or focally integrated states, depending on the specific lesion and the stage of the disease. Accordingly, the integrated HPV type 6 and 11 signals detected in this study should not be interpreted as evidence of malignant transformation in themselves; rather, they may represent a localized molecular event occurring in a subset of infected epithelial cells. Malignant transformation likely requires additional genetic and epigenetic alterations affecting cell cycle regulation, DNA repair, apoptosis, and genomic stability. The absence of a statistically significant association between the intensity of HPV 6/11 signaling and pRb protein expression in this malignant cohort suggests that HPV 6/11-associated laryngeal carcinogenesis where it occurs cannot be explained solely by the progressive loss of pRb protein. Therefore, the observed HPV 6/11 and pRb protein patterns are best interpreted as evidence of biological heterogeneity among laryngeal lesions and as potential indicators of distinct stages or mechanisms of HPV persistence, rather than as independent markers of malignant transformation. Furthermore, Alterations in RB and its associated regulatory pathways are also prevalent across a broad range of adult neoplasms. Previous studies have shown that loss of heterozygosity at the RB/p130 locus is a frequent event in laryngeal lesions and give a good explanation in addition to this may be occur defect in RB /P16 INK4a regulatory pathway due to accumulation of somatic genetic alterations potentially leading to dysregulation and, in some contexts, increased accumulation of pRb protein [62]. This does not rule out the presence of a mutant variant, nor does it exclude the possibility of Rb protein inactivation at the post-transcriptional or post-translational level a phenomenon that may be partly attributed to human papillomavirus (HPV) infection [60]. Alternative explanation for the heterogeneity observed in HPV6/11 DNA-ISH patterns and pRb expression may be the coexistence of multiple viral infections and differences in host immune responses. It has been proposed that concurrent viral infections may exert synergistic effects by promoting epithelial hyperplasia, facilitating the accumulation of premalignant genetic alterations, and potentially accelerating progression toward malignant transformation [63]. Persistent infection with multiple viral types may prolong or intensify viral stimulation of the laryngeal epithelium, thereby sustaining cellular proliferation and increasing genomic instability. Furthermore, persistent HPV infection may reflect an inadequate local immune response to viral clearance rather than a generalized systemic immunodeficiency. In efficient elimination of the virus may permit prolonged persistence within basal and parabasal epithelial cells, thereby increasing the likelihood of accumulating additional genetic and molecular alterations. Accordingly, viral coinfection may represent a potential modifying factor contributing to the persistence and progression of laryngeal lesions, although its specific role in HPV-associated malignant transformation remains to be fully elucidated [64,65].

CONCLUSION

The observed heterogeneity in HPV 6/11 DNA-ISH patterns and pRb expression may reflect the complex interactions between viral infection and alterations in cellular regulatory pathways. Persistent HPV 6/11 infection and incomplete local immune-mediated clearance may potentially allow prolonged viral interaction with basal and parabasal epithelial cells and continued modulation of epithelial proliferation. Such persistence may provide an opportunity for the accumulation of additional molecular and genetic alterations. Furthermore, the coexistence of other viral infections may represent a potential modifying factor influencing viral persistence, epithelial proliferation, and disease progression through interactions with host immune responses and cellular pathways. Nevertheless, the specific contribution of viral coinfection and its role in HPV 6/11-associated malignant transformation remain incompletely understood and warrant further investigation using molecular approaches capable of characterizing concomitant viral infections, host–virus interactions, and functional alterations in the RB pathway.

REFERENCES

  1. Kombe Kombe A.J. et al. “Epidemiology and burden of human papillomavirus and related diseases, molecular pathogenesis, and vaccine evaluation.” Frontiers in Public Health, vol. 8, 2021, article 552028. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.552028.
  2. Mlynarczyk-Bonikowska B. and Rudnicka L. “HPV infections—classification, pathogenesis, and potential new therapies.” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 25, no. 14, 2024, article 7616. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25147616.
  3. Gupta A.K. et al. “Sexually transmitted dermatophyte infections—A scoping review.” Mycoses, vol. 68, no. 7, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1111/myc.70088.
  4. Kohli M. et al. “Human papillomavirus: An update.” Clinics in Dermatology, vol. 44, no. 1, 2026, pp. 54–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clindermatol.2025.09.012.
  5. Cubie H.A. “Diseases associated with human papillomavirus infection.” Virology, vol. 445, nos. 1–2, 2013, pp. 21–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.virol.2013.06.007.
  6. Baba S.K. et al. “Human papilloma virus (HPV) mediated cancers: An insightful update.” Journal of Applied Microbiology, vol. 135, no. 6, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1093/jambio/lxae305.
  7. Wise-Draper T.M. and Wells S.I. “Papillomavirus E6 and E7 proteins and their cellular targets.” Frontiers in Bioscience, vol. 13, no. 3, 2008, pp. 1003–1017. https://doi.org/10.2741/2739.
  8. Roufayel R. et al. “The role of retinoblastoma protein in cell cycle regulation: An updated review.” Current Molecular Medicine, vol. 21, no. 8, 2021, pp. 620–629. https://doi.org/10.2174/1566524020666210104113003.
  9. MacDonald J.I. and Dick F.A. “Posttranslational modifications of the retinoblastoma tumor suppressor protein as determinants of function.” Genes & Cancer, vol. 3, nos. 11–12, 2012, pp. 619–633. https://doi.org/10.1177/1947601912473305.
  10. Bellan E. et al. “The histopathological spectrum of laryngeal epithelial neoplasia.” Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Italica, vol. 46, Supplement 1, 2026. https://doi.org/10.14639/0392-100X-suppl.1-46-2026-A2102.
  11. Šifrer R. et al. “Evaluation of vascular features of vocal cords proposed by the European Laryngological Society.” European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, vol. 275, no. 1, 2018, pp. 147–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-017-4791-5.
  12. Mohammed Ali S.H. et al. “Molecular detection and genotyping of human papilloma virus (HPV 16/18 and 6/11) in patients with laryngeal lesions using DNA-in situ hybridization.” International Research Journal of Natural and Applied Sciences, vol. 3, no. 11, 2016, pp. 71–93.
  13. Taha T.A. et al. “Nuclear co-localization of high oncogenic risk-HPV 16/18 DNA and overexpressed P53 protein in tissues from benign and laryngeal lesions: A molecular study.” AJBPR, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 2231–2560. [Year not provided.]
  14. Shofoluwe N.A. et al. “Demographic and clinical characteristics of benign laryngeal lesions: Insights from a decade of experience in a tertiary hospital.” Nigerian Medical Journal, vol. 65, no. 6, 2024, pp. 961–972. https://doi.org/10.60787/nmj.v65i6.582.
  15. He Z. et al. “Global trends and cross-country inequalities in laryngeal cancer: A systematic analysis of the 2021 Global Burden of Disease study represented by China.” Tobacco Induced Diseases, vol. 23, 2025, article 107. https://doi.org/10.18332/tid/205796.
  16. Bouajila N. et al. “Alcohol and tobacco in cancer: A unified framework of interaction across carcinogenic pathways and cancer types.” Cancer Epidemiology, vol. 104, 2026, article 103166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canep.2026.103166.
  17. Yang F. et al. “Causal association of smoking and laryngeal cancer: A Mendelian randomization study.” Tobacco Induced Diseases, vol. 23, 2025, article 180. https://doi.org/10.18332/tid/209744.
  18. Torrente M.C. et al. “Human papillomavirus infections in laryngeal cancer.” Head & Neck, vol. 33, no. 4, 2011, pp. 581–586. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.21421.
  19. Rafferty M. et al. “Retinoblastoma gene abnormalities in early laryngeal cancer.” European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, vol. 265, Supplement 1, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-007-0558-8.
  20. Ghosh S. et al. “High-risk human papillomavirus infection in squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx: A study from a tertiary care center in North India.” Cureus, vol. 15, no. 2, 2023. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.34760.
  21. Shalatah M.G.A. et al. “Role of P16, P53 and Cyclin D1 in detection of HPV induced laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma: An immunohistochemical study.” Al-Azhar International Medical Journal, vol. 3, no. 5, 2022, pp. 1–7. https://doi.org/10.21608/aimj.2022.102738.1628.
  22. Gomaa M.A. et al. “Human papillomavirus in laryngeal carcinoma: A prospective study.” Otolaryngology Open Journal, vol. 3, no. 1, 2017, pp. 1–7.
  23. Megahed A.S. et al. “Influence of human papillomavirus expression in laryngeal carcinoma.” Egyptian Journal of Ear, Nose, Throat and Allied Sciences, vol. 25, no. 25, 2024, pp. 1–5. https://doi.org/10.21608/ejentas.2024.285723.1790.
  24. Nasseef M.A. et al. “The role of human papillomavirus in laryngeal carcinoma using PCR.” Polish Otorhinolaryngology Review, vol. 13, no. 3, 2024, pp. 1–6. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0054.7126.
  25. Jiang H. et al. “Detection of human papilloma virus type 16 E6 mRNA in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma by in situ hybridization.” Chinese Journal of Cancer Research, vol. 22, no. 3, 2010, pp. 218–223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11670-010-0218-1.
  26. Laskaris S. et al. “Prevalence of human papillomavirus infection in Greek patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx.” Anticancer Research, vol. 34, no. 10, 2014, pp. 5749–5753.
  27. Gallus R. et al. “Prevalence of HPV infection and p16INK4a overexpression in surgically treated laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma.” Vaccines, vol. 10, no. 2, 2022, article 204. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10020204.
  28. Vazquez-Guillen J.M. et al. “p16INK4a and pRb expression in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma with and without infection by EBV or different genotypes of HPV: A retrospective study.” Infectious Agents and Cancer, vol. 18, 2023, article 43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13027-023-00514-x.
  29. Iravani K. et al. “Detection of human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA in benign laryngeal lesions and role of cigarette smoking as an inducing factor.” VirusDisease, vol. 32, no. 2, 2021, pp. 255–259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13337-021-00661-y.
  30. Brooks E.G. et al. “In situ hybridization signal patterns in recurrent laryngeal squamous papillomas indicate that HPV integration occurs at an early stage.” Head and Neck Pathology, vol. 6, no. 1, 2012, pp. 32–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12105-011-0308-5.
  31. Ikegami T. et al. “Development of antibodies against HPV-6 and HPV-11 for the study of laryngeal papilloma.” Viruses, vol. 13, no. 10, 2021, article 2024. https://doi.org/10.3390/v13102024.
  32. Omland T. et al. “Recurrent respiratory papillomatosis: HPV genotypes and risk of high-grade laryngeal neoplasia.” PLOS ONE, vol. 9, no. 6, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099114.
  33. Hirakawa H. et al. “Clinical, virological, and immunohistochemical features of laryngeal papilloma with low-risk human papillomavirus infection: Insights from a 13-year institutional cohort.” World Journal of Surgical Oncology, vol. 24, no. 1, 2026, article 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-025-04130-4.
  34. Manjarrez M.E. et al. “Detection of human papillomavirus and relevant tumor suppressors and oncoproteins in laryngeal tumors.” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 12, no. 23, 2006, pp. 6946–6951. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-1214.
  35. Mujić M. et al. “Human papillomavirus infection in laryngeal lesions in Northeast Bosnia and Herzegovina.” Journal of Health Sciences, vol. 15, no. 1, 2025, pp. 37–41. https://doi.org/10.17532/jhsci.2025.2810.
  36. San Giorgi M.R.M. et al. “Age of onset of recurrent respiratory papillomatosis: A distribution analysis.” Clinical Otolaryngology, vol. 41, no. 5, 2016, pp. 448–453. https://doi.org/10.1111/coa.12565.
  37. Islami F. et al. “Alcohol drinking and laryngeal cancer: Overall and dose-risk relation—a systematic review and meta-analysis.” Oral Oncology, vol. 46, no. 11, 2010, pp. 802–810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2010.07.015.
  38. Havas A. et al. “The role of aging in cancer.” Molecular Oncology, vol. 16, no. 18, 2022, pp. 3213–3219. https://doi.org/10.1002/1878-0261.13302.
  39. Moirangthem R.D. et al. “The central role of DNA damage in immunosenescence.” Ageing Research Reviews, vol. 88, 2023, article 101955. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2023.101955.
  40. Larson D.A. and Derkay C.S. “Epidemiology of recurrent respiratory papillomatosis.” Auris Nasus Larynx, vol. 37, no. 6, 2010, pp. 622–626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anl.2010.03.001.
  41. Robinson D.M. et al. “Recurrent respiratory papillomatosis: A complex defect in immune responsiveness to human papillomavirus-6 and -11.” The Laryngoscope, 2010.
  42. Tjon Pian Gi R.E.A. et al. “Clinical course of recurrent respiratory papillomatosis: Comparison between aggressiveness of human papillomavirus-6 and human papillomavirus-11.” Head & Neck, vol. 37, no. 11, 2015, pp. 1625–1632. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.23808.
  43. González-Moles M.Á. et al. “Updates on larynx cancer epidemiology.” Oral Oncology, vol. 102, 2020, article 104531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2020.104531.
  44. Chen M. and Tse L.A. “Laryngeal cancer and silica dust exposure: A systematic review and meta-analysis.” American Journal of Industrial Medicine, vol. 55, no. 8, 2012, pp. 669–676. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.22037.
  45. Seyyedsalehi M.S. et al. “Occupational exposure to diesel exhaust and head and neck cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies.” European Journal of Cancer Prevention, vol. 33, no. 5, 2024, pp. 425–432. https://doi.org/10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000876.
  46. Abdulsamad A.T. et al. “The association between human papilloma virus and laryngeal masses.” Basrah Journal of Surgery, vol. 25, no. 2, 2019, pp. 39–46. https://doi.org/10.33762/bsurg.2019.164513.
  47. Sun J. et al. “Correlation of human papillomavirus infection with expression of p53 and proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) in laryngeal epitheliopapillomatous lesions in patients with different ethnic backgrounds in Xinjiang.” Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, vol. 13, no. 11, 2012, pp. 5439–5444. https://doi.org/10.7314/apjcp.2012.13.11.5439.
  48. Ghallab A.F. et al. “Study the role of human papilloma virus and laryngopharyngeal reflux in adult vocal fold polyps.” Benha Journal of Applied Sciences, vol. 5, no. 8, part 2, 2020, pp. 255–260. https://doi.org/10.21608/bjas.2020.187221.
  49. Galati L. et al. “HPV and head and neck cancers: Towards early diagnosis and prevention.” Tumour Virus Research, vol. 14, 2022, article 200245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvr.2022.200245.
  50. Levinson J. and Karle W.E. “Laryngeal papillomatosis.” Cancers, vol. 17, no. 6, 2025, article 929. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17060929.
  51. Huebbers C.U. et al. “Integration of HPV6 and downregulation of AKR1C3 expression mark malignant transformation in a patient with juvenile-onset laryngeal papillomatosis.” PLOS ONE, vol. 8, no. 2, 2013, article e57207. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0057207.
  52. Lele S.M. et al. “Molecular events in the progression of recurrent respiratory papillomatosis to carcinoma.” Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, vol. 126, no. 10, 2002, pp. 1184–1188. https://doi.org/10.5858/2002-126-1184-MEITPO.
  53. Reidy P.M. et al. “Integration of human papillomavirus type 11 in recurrent respiratory papilloma-associated cancer.” The Laryngoscope, vol. 114, 2004, pp. 1906–1909. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mlg.0000147918.81733.49.
  54. Deng Z. et al. “Methylation of CpG sites in the upstream regulatory region, physical status and mRNA expression of HPV-6 in adult-onset laryngeal papilloma.” Oncotarget, vol. 8, no. 49, 2017, pp. 85368–85377. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.19898.
  55. Sievers C. et al. “Comprehensive multiomic characterization of human papillomavirus-driven recurrent respiratory papillomatosis reveals distinct molecular subtypes.” Communications Biology, vol. 4, 2021, article 1416. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-021-02942-0.
  56. Kurita S. et al. “Pathological mechanisms of laryngeal papillomatosis based on laryngeal epithelial characteristics.” Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology, vol. 4, 2019, pp. 100–106. https://doi.org/10.1002/lio2.242.
  57. Doorbar J. et al. “The biology and life-cycle of human papillomaviruses.” Vaccine, vol. 30, Supplement 5, 2012, pp. F55–F70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.06.083.
  58. Rahmoun M. et al. “Genomic diversity of HPV6 and HPV11 in recurrent respiratory papillomatosis: Association with malignant transformation in the lungs and clinical outcomes.” Tumour Virus Research, vol. 18, 2024, article 200294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvr.2024.200294.
  59. Wang F. and Huangfu H.H. “Laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma: A functional ‘two-hit’ model of papillomavirus–Epstein–Barr virus synergistic carcinogenesis.” Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, vol. 16, 2026. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2026.1768893.
  60. Zhang B. et al. “The E7 proteins of low- and high-risk human papillomaviruses share the ability to target the pRB family member p130 for degradation.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 103, no. 2, 2006, pp. 437–442. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0510346103.
  61. anft W. et al. “Sexually transmitted human papillomavirus and related sequelae.” Clinical Microbiology Reviews, vol. 38, no. 1, 2025, article e00085-23. https://doi.org/10.1128/cmr.00085-23.
  62. O’Sullivan E.A. et al. “The paradox of senescent-marker positive cancer cells: Challenges and opportunities.” npj Aging, vol. 10, 2024, article 41.
  63. Jindal N. et al. “Synergistic oncogenesis cooperative role of Epstein Barr virus and human papillomavirus in cancer progression.” Reviews in Medical Virology, 2026. https://doi.org/10.1002/rmv.70173.
  64. Samuckkeethum W. et al. “Recurrent respiratory papillomatosis: Recent advances in HPV-6/HPV-11-targeted immunotherapy.” Asian Pacific Journal of Allergy and Immunology, vol. 43, no. 4, 2025, pp. 984–996. https://doi.org/10.12932/AP-171225-2190.
  65. Vats A. and Laimins L. “How human papillomavirus (HPV) targets DNA repair pathways for viral replication: From guardian to accomplice.” Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, vol. 89, no. 1, 2025, article e0015323. https://doi.org/10.1128/mmbr.00153-23.
Recommended Articles
Research Article In-Press

From 4Ds to Childhood NCDs: RBSK 2.0 and the Changing Landscape of Child Health in India

...
pdf Download PDF
Research Article In-Press

Spencer Technique Versus Scapular Stabilization Exercises in Diabetic Adhesive Capsulitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial

...
pdf Download PDF
Research Article In-Press

From Oral Health to Systemic Impact: Assessing Saudi Dental Professionals’ Knowledge of the Nitrate–Nitric Oxide Pathway and Implications for Dental Practice

...
pdf Download PDF
Review Article In-Press

Diabetes Self-Care in Asia, the Gulf Cooperation Council and Western Countries: A Systematic Review with Narrative Synthesis

...
pdf Download PDF
Copyright © Journal of Pioneering Medical Sciences until unless otherwise.