News Section | | Volume 2 Issue 2 (April-June, 2012) | Pages 42 - 42

Lebrikizumab: A new monoclonal antibody for asthmatics

1
Independent Medical Researcher, Kolkata, India
Under a Creative Commons license
Open Access
Received
Jan. 1, 2012
Accepted
Feb. 5, 2012
Published
June 30, 2012

Abstract

None

The pathophysiology of asthma is complex, with participation and activation of several  acute and chronic inflammatory pathways within the airway. This complexity is further enhanced clinically due to the heterogenous response of asthma to treatment.

Why this study was needed ?

Majority of asthma patients are managed by primary care physicians with effective and safe therapies. However, some patients have poor control of their asthma despite adequate treatment. Recently, elevated levels of interleukin-13 were found in the sputum of patients with poorly controlled asthma, and it  was hypothesized that inhibiting interleukin-13 may benefit such patients. Lebrizikumab is an IgG4 humanised monoclonal antibody that specifically binds to interleukin-13, and thereby inhibits it. The study was planned to examine whether  Lebrizikumab use leads to decreased levels of interleukin-13, along with marked clinical improvement. N.B: The study uses serum periostin as a surrogate marker for interleukin-13 owing to the fact that highly sensitive assays are required to quanitify interleukin-13 in blood or airway samples.

Study design : Random, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-center

What the study found ?

 Lebrikizumab treatment was associated with improved lung function (mean FEV1 ↑↑ by 5.5% after 12 weeks) as the primary study outcome. Patients with high pre-treatment levels of serum periostin had a greater improvement in lung function with lebrikizumab than patients with low periostin levels (8.2% vs. 1.6%, both compared to the placebo). The adverse drug reaction profiles of the lebrikizumab and placebo groups were mostly similar, except for musculoskeletal side effects, which were more common in the lebrikizumab group than in the placebo group (13.2% vs. 5.4%).

Where the were the limitations ?

Although objective improvement in lung function was observed, it did not have any significant reduction in the rate of protocol-defined exacerbations/severe exacerbations, or on the measures assessed as per the  daily diary entries of the patient.

What is the way forward ?

The study needs replication involving larger numbers and wider genetic variation. Also, the study underlines the role of identifying bio-chemical markers like periostin in clinical practise. Another question that has been added to the enigma of asthma and its heterogeneity is about the management of patients with low periostin levels and uncontrolled asthma.

Recommended Articles
Research Article

Nurses' Perception Toward Therapeutic Strategies for Children with Pneumonia

...
Published: 16/11/2023
pdf Download PDF
Case Report

Intimal Flap Intussusception into the Innominate Artery of a Bovine-type Aortic Arch in a Acute Type-A Aortic Dissection: A Case Report

Published: 16/11/2023
pdf Download PDF
Research Article

Assessment of Serum Caspase-1, IL-10, and IL-18 Levels in Baghdad's Medical City in Women with Polycystic Ovary

...
Published: 16/11/2023
pdf Download PDF
Research Article

Prevalence of Face Mask-Induced Dry Eye and Ocular Irritation Amid COVID-19 Among Health Workers in Jazan

...
Published: 16/11/2023
pdf Download PDF
Review Article

Role of Biomarkers in the Diagnosis of Anastomotic Leakage After Colorectal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

...
Published: 16/11/2023
pdf Download PDF
Copyright © iARCON International LLP unless stated otherwise.