Background: Bacterial diseases play a major role in urinary tract infections and Staphylococcus aureus (SA) is one of the most common causes of UTIs in humans. Infections caused by Staph. aureus can develop into invasive, potentially life-threatening infections due to disruption of the body's defense mechanisms, such as bacteremia. Objectives: The present study aimed to evaluate the correlation between phenotypic beta-lactamase production and PCR-based detection of the blaZ gene among urinary Staphylococcus aureus isolates in Diyala province. Methods: One hundred samples were collected from sources of urinary tract infections and cultured on blood agar, nutrient agar and mannitol agar. Bacterial isolates were identified using biochemical tests and molecular detection of beta-lactamase using beta-lactamase-specific blaZ primers. Results Out of 100 urine samples collected, 40 isolates of Staphylococcus aureus were identified. The isolates in our study showed 40 (100%) production of hemolysin, 32 (80%) production of urease and 28 (70%) production of biofilms. They also produced 62.5% of gen of beta-lactamase blaZ. Molecular detection of the gene responsible for beta-lactamase production revealed its presence in 100% of bacterial isolates that phenotypically expressed beta-lactamase. Conclusion: Variations in the production of virulence factors, including hemolysin, urease, cell membrane factor and beta-lactamase enzymes, were observed in the bacterial isolates. The bacteria demonstrated resistance to antibiotics, particularly amoxicillin. The presence of the gene responsible for beta-lactamase production was also detected in the isolates, contributing to the bacterial resistance to antibiotics.
Certain bacteria cause urinary tract infections, including Staphylococcus aureus. These bacteria are among the most common infections in the community, second only to respiratory tract infections Although Gram-negative bacteria are the major cause of urinary tract infections, Staphylococcus aureus has emerged as an important opportunistic uropathogen associated with complicated infections, catheterization and increasing antimicrobial resistance [1]. Staphylococcus aureus is a clinically important Gram-positive opportunistic pathogen capable of causing a wide range of human infections, including urinary tract infections, particularly in complicated or healthcare-associated cases [2]. Staphylococcus aureus produces several virulence factors, including enzymes and surface-associated structures, that contribute to its ability to adhere to host tissues, evade immune responses and establish persistent infections. Among these, biofilm formation plays a particularly important role in facilitating colonization and persistence in clinical infections such as urinary tract infections [3]. Hemolysins produced by Staphylococcus aureus contribute to tissue damage and enhance bacterial invasiveness, thereby facilitating the progression of infection [4]. Staphylococcus aureus is a clinically significant pathogen responsible for a wide range of human infections, including both localized and systemic diseases. Its clinical importance is particularly associated with its ability to cause persistent and difficult-to-treat infections [5]. A key virulence factor of Staphylococcus aureus is its ability to form biofilms, which enhance bacterial survival by protecting cells from antimicrobial agents and host immune responses, thereby contributing to persistent and recurrent infections, including urinary tract infections, particularly in complicated cases [6]. The clinical management of Staphylococcus aureus infections is complicated by its ability to develop antimicrobial resistance. The emergence and spread of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) have significantly limited therapeutic options and contributed to increased clinical burden worldwide [7]. Understanding the genetic determinants of antimicrobial resistance, particularly beta-lactamase-mediated mechanisms, is essential for improving diagnostic accuracy and guiding appropriate antimicrobial therapy in Staphylococcus aureus infections [8]. In particular, β-lactam resistance in Staphylococcus aureus remains a significant clinical concern due to its impact on the effectiveness of commonly used antibiotics [9]. Following the introduction of penicillin, Staphylococcus aureus rapidly developed resistance, highlighting its remarkable ability to adapt to antimicrobial pressure [10]. However, resistance in Staphylococcus aureus emerged shortly after the introduction of penicillin, with early reports indicating the development of penicillin-resistant strains [11,12]. The study aimed to detect the present study aimed to evaluate the correlation between phenotypic beta-lactamase production and PCR-based detection of the blaZ gene among urinary Staphylococcus aureus isolates in Diyala province. Due to the increasing prevalence of beta-lactam resistance among Staphylococcus aureus isolates and the limited molecular data available in Diyala province, this study aimed to detect the blaZ gene in S. aureus isolated from urinary tract infection patients using PCR technique.
Specimen Collection and Transportation
Staphylococcus aureus was isolated from clinical specimens of Urinary Tract Infections (UTIs) from patients attending Baqubah Teaching Hospital and Al-Batoul Hospital in Baqubah and patients attending external health laboratories in Baqubah, Diyala, Iraq, during the period from June 1, 2025 to August 25, 2025. One hundred samples were collected from UTI cases and transported in a cork-lined box containing ice to the Microbiology Unit, Agriculture Laboratory, Midstream clean-catch urine samples were collected using sterile containers under aseptic conditions. Samples were transported to the laboratory within 1-2 hours of collection and processed immediately upon arrival or stored at appropriate conditions to minimize contamination. The study included 100 urine samples collected from patients clinically suspected of having Urinary Tract Infections (UTIs) based on hospital diagnosis and presenting symptoms such as dysuria, increased urinary frequency and other relevant clinical indicators. Both catheterized and non-catheterized patients were included in the study. Repeated samples from the same patient were excluded to avoid duplication bias. Only single, unique patient samples were considered for analysis. The selection of samples was based on routine hospital attendance without further restriction, provided that clinical suspicion of UTI was present.
Morphological Examination
Diagnosis of Staphylococcus aureus: All bacterial isolates recovered from the 100 urine samples were subjected to Gram staining. Different bacterial species were identified among the isolates. Only Gram-positive cocci arranged predominantly in clusters were presumptively identified as Staphylococcus spp. Among the recovered isolates, 40 fulfilled these criteria and were selected for further identification and characterization.
Identification Procedure
Clinical urine samples were cultured on selective and differential media for primary bacterial isolation. Samples were inoculated onto nutrient agar and mannitol salt agar and incubated aerobically at 37°C for 24 h. After incubation, colony morphology, including color and texture, was examined. Different bacterial species were recovered from the cultured samples. Colonies suspected to belong to Staphylococcus spp. were further evaluated by Gram staining and standard biochemical tests, including catalase and coagulase tests. Confirmatory identification of isolates was subsequently performed using the VITEK system [13].
Biochemical Identification Tests
Standard microbiological procedures were used for the identification of Staphylococcus aureus using biochemical tests. Primary identification was based on key biochemical characteristics, including positive catalase and coagulase reactions. Additional phenotypic characteristics, including hemolysin production and urease activity, were evaluated among confirmed isolates to assess strain-level variation and potential virulence-associated traits. S. aureus isolates also commonly ferment glucose, mannitol and maltose and may exhibit gelatin hydrolysis and beta-hemolysis on blood agar [14].
Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing
In vitro antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed using the Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute [19] guidelines. Three antibiotics commonly used in the treatment of urinary tract infections were selected for testing, including amoxicillin, gentamicin and tetracycline. All Staphylococcus aureus isolates were tested against these antibiotics and the results were interpreted based on CLSI breakpoints as shown in Table 1.
Table 1: Antibiotics Used in Susceptibility Testing and Their Inhibitory Diameters
|
Antibiotics |
The symbol |
Antibiotic Concentration\mg |
Standard diameters |
||
|
R |
I |
S |
|||
|
Amoxicillin |
AUG |
20 |
|||
|
Gentamicin |
GM |
10 |
≥12 |
13-14 |
≤15 |
|
Tetracycline |
TE |
30 |
≥11 |
12-14 |
≤15 |
Detection Biofilm Formation Assay
Biofilm formation was assessed using the Tube Method (TM), a qualitative assay based on direct visual observation of biofilm formation [16]. A fresh bacterial colony was inoculated into 10 mL of Brain Heart Infusion Broth (BHIB) and incubated at 37°C for 24 h. Following incubation, the contents of the tubes were discarded and the tubes were gently washed with buffered saline to remove non-adherent cells. The tubes were then dried and stained with 0.1% crystal violet. Excess stain was removed and the tubes were rinsed with deionized water. Biofilm formation was visually evaluated based on the presence of a stained adherent layer on the inner walls and bottom of the tubes. Formation of a visible dark-stained film was considered a positive result for biofilm production.
Phenotypic Detection of β-Lactamase Production
β-lactamase production was detected using the filter paper method as previously described [17]. Isolates showing resistance to one or more β-lactam antibiotics were selected for testing. Filter paper strips (5×1 cm) were prepared and soaked in a 1% amoxicillin solution, then allowed to dry at room temperature. The tested bacterial isolates were inoculated onto the prepared strips using a sterile loop and spread over an area of approximately 5 cm2. The inoculated filter papers were placed in Petri dishes and incubated at 37°C for 30 min. After incubation, the filter papers were immersed in iodine solution. A positive result indicating β-lactamase production was recorded when the inoculated area became colorless within 10 min. In contrast, persistence of the purple color was considered a negative result, indicating the absence of detectable β-lactamase production.
Molecular Detection of the Virulence Factor β-Lactamase of Staphylococcus aureus
After visually identifying the ability of bacterial isolates to produce specific virulence factors, the isolates with the highest rates of beta-lactam enzyme production were selected for molecular detection of the genes encoding this enzyme using the blaz primer for beta-lactamase detection.
Extraction of Genomic DNA from Bacteria
Genomic DNA was extracted from bacterial isolates using the Presto™ Mini gDNA Bacteria Kit (Geneaid, Taiwan) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The extraction procedure was performed as described in the kit protocol and is summarized in Table 2.
Table 2: Components of the Presto Mini gDNA Bacteria Kit
|
Volume |
The Components |
|
30 mL |
G+ Buffer |
|
30 mL |
GT Buffer |
|
40 mL |
GB Buffer |
|
45 mL |
BufferW1 |
|
25 mL (100 mL) |
Wash Buffer (Add ethanol) |
|
110 mg |
Lysozyme |
|
11 mg (1.1 mL) |
Proteinase K(Add ddH2O) |
|
30 mL |
Elution Buffer |
|
100 |
GD Columns |
|
200 |
2ml collection tube |
Primers Used in PCR Reaction
The primer prepared by Macrogen shown in Table 3 was used.
Table 3: Primers Used in PCR Reactions
|
Bacteria |
Name of primer |
5, to 3,)) Sequence |
(bp) volume |
Source |
|
Staphylococcus aureus |
blaZ |
F: AAG AGA TTT GCC TAT GCT TC R: GCT TGA CCA CTT TTA TCA GC |
559 |
Dehbashi et al. [20] |
Characterisation of DNA
Measuring the concentration and purity of DNA using the Nano Drop device was done.
Agarose Gel Electrophoresis of DNA
Eight microliters of each DNA sample were mixed with two microliters of bromophenol blue staining. Each sample mixture was then placed on a 1% agarose gel. The power supply was turned on and the apparatus was primed. After electrophoresis, the gel was removed from the gel plate in the electrophoresis apparatus and examined in a dark room after being exposed to 260 nm ultraviolet light. The gel was imaged using gel documents. The molecular size of the DNA fragments was estimated by comparing the band position and thickness with a standard size guide (100 base pairs). The molecular weight of the DNA was estimated based on the distance the particles traveled in the gel [20].
Polymerase Chain Reaction
A master mix reaction mixture (19 µL of nuclease-free water, 2 µL of premix solution, 1 µL of each forward primer at a concentration of 10 pmol/µL and 1 µL of each reverse primer at a concentration of 10 pmol/µL) was prepared according to the number of bacterial samples being prepared. The master mix reaction mixture was then placed in 0.2 mL Eppendorf tubes, with a volume of 23 µL per sample. 2 µL of DNA was then added to each tube, until the final volume was 25 µL. It was then placed in a thermocycler using the appropriate program as shown in Table 4.
Table 4: Thermopolymer Program for the PCR Reaction Mixture for the Primers Used
|
Brimer |
Denatur.-1 |
Denatur.-2 |
Annealing |
Exten.-1 |
Exten.-2 |
|
blaZ |
95 cº /5 sec |
94 cº /30 sec |
55 cº /30 sec |
72 cº /60 sec |
72 cº /5 sec |
|
1 Cycle |
35 Cycle |
1 Cycle |
|||
The primers prepared by Macrogen were used and re-dissolved according to the manufacturer's instructions, after which a crude solution of each primer at a concentration of 100 pmol/µL was obtained. Also, a premix solution prepared by Pioneer, consisting of PCR buffer, NTPS deoxynucleotide solution and Taq DNA polymerase, was used.
Statistical Analysis
All experiments were performed in triplicate to ensure reproducibility. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and presented as frequencies and percentages. Graphs and tables were prepared using Microsoft Excel (64-bit edition) and Origin software (64-bit version).
Diagnosis of Staphylococcus aureus
Initial isolation results on mannitol salt agar medium showed that out of 100 samples collected from patients with urinary tract infections, 40 samples showed positive growth of Staphylococcus aureus, representing 40% of the total. The samples were collected from sources of urinary tract infections and were of different ages, including females and males, ranging in age from one to 50 years. The number of infected females was 29 samples, representing 72.5%, while the number of infected males was 11 samples, representing 27.5%. The samples were collected under the supervision of a specialist physician.
Phenotyping Screening of Virulence Factors
The isolated bacteria exhibited the ability to produce several virulence-associated factors, including β-hemolysin, biofilm formation and urease enzyme activity, as presented in Table 5.
Table 5: Rate of Production of Virulence Factors by Staphylococcus aureus
|
Virulence factors |
Staphylococcus aureus (40 out of 100) |
|
|
No. |
% |
|
|
β.hem |
40 |
100 |
|
Bio. |
28 |
70 |
|
Ure. |
32 |
80 |
These phenotypic traits may contribute to the pathogenic potential of the isolates.
Urease Production
Staphylococcus aureus isolates showed that 32 isolates (80%) were urease-positive, while 8 isolates (20%) were urease-negative. Urease production was indicated by a color change of the medium from yellow to pink, as shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1: The Production of Urease Enzyme by Staphylococcus aureus
Hemolysins Production
All Staphylococcus aureus isolates (100%) demonstrated hemolysin production, as indicated by clear zones around the bacterial colonies. Among the isolates, 30 (75%) showed complete β-hemolysis, while 10 (25%) exhibited partial α-hemolysis, as shown in Figure 2.
Figure 2: The Production of the Hemolysin Enzyme by Staphylococcus aureus
Biofilm Formation
Among the 40 tested Staphylococcus aureus isolates, 28 isolates (70%) demonstrated the ability to form biofilms, whereas 12 isolates (30%) showed no detectable biofilm-forming ability. These findings indicate a high prevalence of biofilm production among the examined isolates, as shown in Figure 3.
Figure 3: The Production of Biofilm Enzyme by Staphylococcus aureus
Enzyme Beta-Lactamase Production
The ability of Staphylococcus aureus isolates to produce β-lactamase was clearly demonstrated. Out of the 40 tested isolates, 25 (62.5%) were β-lactamase producers, whereas 15 isolates (37.5%) were non-producers.
Staphylococcus aureus Sensitivity
The sensitivity of Staphylococcus aureus bacteria to three antibiotics was tested. The results showed that Staphylococcus aureus isolates recorded the highest resistance rate to amoxicillin (95%) and the highest sensitivity (5%), followed by gentamicin (90%) and tetracycline (77.5%) (Table 6, Figure 4).
Table 6: The Percentage of the Sensitivity of Staphylococcus aureus is Under Study Towards Antibiotics
|
Antibiotics |
Staphylococcus aureus (40) |
||
|
S% |
I% |
R% |
|
|
Amoxicillin |
5 |
0 |
95 |
|
Gentamicin |
10 |
0 |
90 |
|
Tetracycline |
22.5 |
0 |
77.5 |
Figure 4: Shows Sensitivity of Staphylococcus aureus to Antibiotics
Polymerase Chain Reaction
PCR Detection of blaZ Genes in Staphylococcus aureus: The blaZ-specific primer was used to detect the presence of the blaZ gene, which encodes the β-lactamase enzyme in Staphylococcus aureus. PCR products were separated by agarose gel electrophoresis and visualized under UV light. A distinct amplification band of approximately 559 bp, corresponding to the expected size of the blaZ gene fragment, was observed in the blaZ gene was detected in 6 out of 8 isolates (Figure 5).
PCR analysis using blaZ-specific primers revealed the presence of the blaZ gene in the examined Staphylococcus aureus isolates. Agarose gel electrophoresis showed a distinct amplification product of approximately 559 bp, corresponding to the expected size of the blaZ gene fragment (Figure 5).
Figure 5: Results of Electrophoresis on 2% Agarose Gel blaZ (559 bp)
Lane M contained the 100 bp DNA ladder, while lanes 1-8 represented the tested isolates. The appearance of the 559 bp band in the positive isolates confirmed the successful amplification and presence of the blaZ gene, indicating their potential ability to produce β-lactamase enzyme and contribute to β-lactam antibiotic resistance.
The detection of the blaZ gene among the examined Staphylococcus aureus isolates indicates their ability to produce β-lactamase enzymes that hydrolyze the β-lactam ring of penicillins, thereby reducing the effectiveness of several β-lactam antibiotics. Although blaZ is commonly associated with resistance to penicillin and amoxicillin, its clinical significance extends to treatment selection and antimicrobial stewardship. The presence of blaZ suggests that β-lactamase-sensitive antibiotics may be ineffective against these isolates and highlights the need for susceptibility-guided therapy. Moreover, blaZ represents only one component of the antimicrobial resistance profile of S. aureus. Other resistance determinants, particularly the mecA gene, confer resistance through a different mechanism involving the production of the altered penicillin-binding protein PBP2a, which is characteristic of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA). Therefore, the detection of blaZ provides valuable information regarding β-lactamase-mediated resistance but comprehensive molecular characterization including mecA screening would offer a more complete understanding of the resistance patterns present in the studied isolates.
The results of the current study were consistent with those of Ahmed et al. [21], who indicated that the infection rate among females was higher than that of males, at 51.53%. The difference in infection rates between males and females may be due to the unequal distribution of samples between females and males, as more female samples were taken than males. The difference may also be due to the quantity and quality of the natural flora in the bodies of the different sexes, in addition to differences in sample collection methods. It may also be due to females' exposure to repeated pregnancy and childbirth, hormonal and physical activity, psychological conditions such as anxiety and stress, health status, poor personal hygiene and nutritional quality. All of these factors contribute to the higher number of infected females than males. In addition to the proportion of physiological differences between the sexes, the effect of age on infection rates is also taken into account.
The process of exchanging plasmids in bacteria to receive antibiotics and the changing local microbial environment, also sheds light on the biological activities of bacteria [22].
The results of our study were consistent with those of Hussien and Makhrmash [23] and Obaid [24], both of them demonstrated, through separate local studies, that Staphylococcus aureus is capable of producing this agent at 100% efficiency. However, the results differed from those of Al-Masoudi [25], in his study, Staphylococcus aureus isolated from various clinical infections showed a hemolysin production rate of 53.33%, a result that is not similar to our research results.
While the result was consistent with the result of the study of researcher Kai et al. [26], who proved through his study the ability of Staphylococcal bacteria isolates isolated from urinary tract infections to produce the urease enzyme, as he showed the intense urease activity through the high expression of urease genes in the bacteria.
The enzyme urease works to create a suitable environment for bacterial survival at the site of infection by changing the pH and neutralizing the toxic effect of urea after converting it to carbon dioxide and ammonia (NH3). This increases the pH and thus promotes bacterial growth [27]. The production of ammonia in the medium raises the pH, which in turn leads to the precipitation of naturally soluble calcium and magnesium ions. These salt crystals can develop into large crystals, causing bladder and kidney stones, thus impeding the effectiveness of antibiotic treatment, as bacteria are resistant to antibiotics [28].
The current results are consistent with the results of Al-Hayali [29], as his isolates (13, representing 65%) were biofilm-producing Staphylococcus aureus. However, this result differs from the results of Al-Masoodi [25]. The percentage of isolates capable of producing biofilm factor was 100% and it is also different from the results of Bissong and Ateba [30], who explained through the study they conducted that the percentage of biofilm production reached 90.9% and this result does not match the result of our study.
In a study by Khalaf et al. [31] to detect the beta-lactam gene in Staphylococcus aureus bacteria causing urinary tract infections in Diyala Governorate, this gene was found in 100% of the isolates producing the beta-lactamase enzyme. Snoussi et al. [32]. In their study to detect this gene, they reported its presence in 87.5% of isolates producing this enzyme. These results are similar to those of our current study.
The detection of alternative genes, such as mecA and mecC, which are involved in β-lactamase enzyme production, accounts for the ability of certain bacterial isolates to synthesize this enzyme even in the absence of the blaZ gene [32]. In addition, some isolates lose the ability to produce this enzyme after long-term storage, especially since this gene is carried on a plasmid. This is the same thing we observed during repeated phenotypic detection, as upon first detection, some isolates showed apparent production of the beta-lactamase enzyme. After we preserved them until genetic detection and after we activated the preserved isolates and repeated the phenotypic detection test for the beta-lactamase enzyme, some isolates lost this ability to produce.
The high level of resistance to amoxicillin observed among the studied isolates suggests that empirical use of this antibiotic for the treatment of Staphylococcus aureus-associated urinary tract infections in the study area should be approached with caution. However, given the limited number of antimicrobial agents and molecular resistance markers investigated, further studies involving broader resistance profiling are required before definitive clinical recommendations can be made.
In conclusion, the examined Staphylococcus aureus isolates exhibited variable expression of important virulence factors, including hemolysin, urease, cell membrane factor and β-lactamase, highlighting their pathogenic potential. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing revealed resistance to several antibiotics, with the highest resistance observed against amoxicillin, indicating the growing challenge of antibiotic-resistant S. aureus strains. Molecular analysis confirmed the presence of the blaZ gene in all phenotypically β-lactamase-producing isolates, demonstrating a strong correlation between phenotypic resistance and the underlying genetic determinant. The detection of blaZ emphasizes the role of β-lactamase-mediated resistance in reducing the efficacy of penicillin and other β-lactamase-sensitive antibiotics and underscores the importance of molecular diagnostics for the accurate identification of resistant isolates. The integration of phenotypic and genotypic approaches provides a more comprehensive understanding of resistance mechanisms and supports informed antibiotic selection and effective infection management. These findings contribute to ongoing efforts to monitor antimicrobial resistance, improve public health outcomes and support Sustainable Development Goal 3 (Good Health and Well-being) through the early detection and control of antibiotic-resistant bacterial pathogens.
Limitations
This study has several limitations that should be considered when interpreting the findings. First, the study was conducted on a relatively limited number of isolates collected from a single geographical area (Diyala Province), which may restrict the generalizability of the results. Second, the antimicrobial susceptibility analysis included a limited panel of antibiotics and therefore may not fully represent the resistance profile of the examined isolates. Third, molecular characterization was restricted to the detection of the blaZ gene, while other important resistance determinants, such as mecA and additional resistance-associated genes, were not investigated. Furthermore, the study relied mainly on descriptive analyses and more advanced statistical approaches could provide stronger evidence regarding the relationships between virulence factors, antimicrobial resistance and molecular findings. Future studies involving larger sample sizes, broader antimicrobial testing and expanded molecular analyses are recommended to provide a more comprehensive understanding of antimicrobial resistance in Staphylococcus aureus.
Future Research Directions
Future studies should include a broader molecular investigation of antimicrobial resistance in Staphylococcus aureus, particularly through the detection of additional resistance genes such as mecA and other clinically relevant genetic determinants. Expanding the antimicrobial susceptibility panel and examining genotype-phenotype correlations would provide a more comprehensive understanding of resistance mechanisms. The application of advanced molecular techniques, including multiplex PCR and DNA sequencing, would further improve the accuracy and depth of resistance characterization. In addition, multicenter studies involving different Iraqi provinces are recommended to generate more representative epidemiological data and support national antimicrobial resistance surveillance programs.
Ethical Approval
The study was conducted in accordance with the ethical principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Prior to sample collection, verbal informed consent was obtained from all participants. Urine samples were collected solely for research purposes and all personal information was kept confidential. No identifying information was included in the laboratory records or data analysis, ensuring participant anonymity and privacy throughout the study.