Research Article | In-Press | Volume 14 Issue 12 (December, 2025) | Pages 112 - 116

Osteoarthritis in Young Population - Clinical and Pathological Attributes

orcid
1
Faculty of Medicine, Northern Border University, Arar, Saudi Arabia
Under a Creative Commons license
Open Access

Abstract

Aims and Objectives: To identify the causes of osteoarthritis in young population. To describe clinical presentation and laboratory findings. Highlight the differences between osteoarthritis in young and older population. 4. Compare the observed findings with published literature. Results: A total of 30 cases of Osteoarthritis in Young Patients (15-50 years) was studied and reveals the following causes. Genu Varus 8 (26.7%). Genu Valgus 3 (10%) Obesity 4 (13.3%) Trauma 3 (10%) Coxa Vara 10 (33.3%) Coxa Valgus 1 (3.3%) Alcoholic 1 (3.3%). Regards to clinical presentation pain is most common symptom (100%) followed by difficulty walking (50%) restriction of movements (43%). Duration of Arthritis and its clinical features varied from 1 year (Genu Varus) to 9 years (Obesity). Regards to sex, males (76.6%) are affected more than females (23.4%). Regards to Age, minimum age at onset of Arthritis is 28 years (trauma) to maximum of 50 years (Genu Varum). Inflammatory Markers (ESR is within normal limits and CRP is negative in all patients) suggesting the degenerative nature of disease and ruling out infectious/inflammatory process. Biopsy is not advised in any one of the patients. Methods: Patients with signs and symptoms of osteoarthritis in the age group of 15-50 years are selected and studied during period of one year (1-6-2024 to 1-6-2025). Characteristics included in the proforma are age, sex possible cause, duration, clinical presentation (sign/symptom), site/joint involved, imaging finding, laboratory features such as CBP, CRP, ESR including biopsy changes. The descriptive findings are mentioned. Discussion: Osteoarthritis in young generation is a hidden and masked entity which need to be detected at earliest stage to prevent progressive joint disease. Identification of the underlying causes and the avoidance /treatment can slow or prevent the condition. The clinical presentation and pathological features can vary in contrast to adult variant. The pathogenesis depends upon the underlying cause and prognosis is related to the severity of the underlying condition. Conclusion: In the present study various risk factors for osteoarthritis has been identified. These modifiable conditions can be treated earlier or avoided by proper interventions to prevent or slow the joint damage and progressive disease.

Keywords
Arthritis, Young, Degeneration, Developmental, Genetic, Injury

INTRODUCTION

Osteoarthritis in Young people is an emerging under reported entity which needed to be detected at the earliest, to avoid permanent joint damage and lessen the burden on public health system along with preservation of productive years in young generation. The causes vary from trauma, genetic, obesity, developmental anomalies and categorized as primary or secondary. The diagnosis of osteoarthritis depends on combination of clinical examination, imaging and investigative tools. The pain which is characteristic of osteoarthritis is tolerated well in early stage of disease and patient usually presents late in course of disease to physician, in addition ultrasonography is recommended to evaluate joint disease [1]. Literature suggests that younger set of patients with osteoarthritis are relatively more likely to experience sense of disease and its physical and mental effects, leading to overall dissatisfaction [2]. Regards to role of race and ethnicity it was noted that osteoarthritis in young age is more prevalent in African Americans compared to other groups [3]. The effect of occupation and physical activity is also related to development of disease as observed by increased frequency in military personnel and athletes [4]. Evaluation of outcome in knee and Hip osteoarthritis of young includes PROM (patient reported outcome measures) that take into consideration the pain and function of joints [5]. The management options include initial conservative strategies like weight reduction, muscle strengthening, aerobic exercises and then arthroscopic interventions, followed by more invasive surgical procedures if previous measures have failed [6]. Early identification of markers of osteoarthritis is critical and include childhood joint injury, developmental conditions such as early adulthood varus /valgus malalignment are proposed to be associated with osteoarthritis later in life [7]. The pathogenetic concepts in recent years has shifted from degeneration to inflammatory injury with total joint failure [8]. Sex predilection is comparatively more for females due to anatomical structure of female knee joint which predisposes to arthritis [9]. Gadolinum enhanced MRI (dGEMRIC) is proved to be useful in detection of early structural changes of joint in osteoarthritis patients [10].

METHODS

Patients with signs and symptoms of osteoarthritis in the age group of 15-50 years are selected and studied during period of one year (1-6-2024 to 1-6-2025). Characteristics included in the proforma are age, sex possible cause, duration, clinical presentation (sign/symptom), site/joint involved, imaging finding, laboratory features such as CBP, CRP, ESR including biopsy changes (Table 1). The descriptive findings are mentioned.

RESULTS

A total of 30 cases of Osteoarthritis in Young Patients (15-50 years) was studied and reveals the following causes; Genu Varus 8 (26.7%), Genu Valgus 3 (10%), Obesity 4 (13.3%), Trauma 3 (10%), Coxa Vara 10 (33.3%), Coxa Valgus 1 (3.3%), Alcoholic 1 (3.3%). Regards to clinical presentation pain is most common symptom (100%) followed by difficulty walking (50%) restriction of movements (43%). Duration of Arthritis and its clinical features varied from 1 year (Genu Varus) to 9 years (Obesity). Regards to sex, males (76.6%) are affected more than females (23.4%). Regards to Age, minimum age at onset of Arthritis is 28 years (trauma) to maximum of 50 years (Genu Varum). Inflammatory Markers (ESR is within normal limits and CRP is negative in all patients) suggesting the degenerative nature of disease and ruling out infectious/inflammatory process (Figures 1-7). Biopsy is not advised in any of the patients.

 

Table 1: Proforma for osteoarthritis in young population

S.no

Age in years

Sex

Possible underlying cause

Duration in years

Clinical presentation

Site involved

Imaging findings

Laboratory findings Haemoglobin (Hb) CRP, ESR (including biopsy)

1

41

M

genu varum

2

Pain

Knee

Narrow joint space, osteophytes

Hb-12, CRP negative

2

48

F

Genu varum

6

Pain

Knee

Narrow joint space, osteophytes

Hb-13 CRP negative, ESR-10

3

49

M

Genu varum

4

Pain and difficulty in walking

Knee

Narrow joint space, osteophytes

Hb 14, ESR 12, CRP negative

4

47

M

Coxa vara

7

Pain and difficulty in walking

Hip

Incongruent head

Hb 11, ESR 18, CRP positive

5

45

M

Genu valgus

3

Pain and restriction of movements

Knee

Narrow joint space, osteophytes

Hb-11 CRP negative, ESR-10

6

50

M

Genu valgus

5

Pain and restriction of movements

Knee

Narrow joint space, osteophytes

Hb-14 CRP negative, ESR-08

7

49

F

Obese

9

Pain and restriction of movements

Knee

Narrow joint space, osteophytes

Hb-12 CRP negative, ESR-13

8

44

M

Coxa vara

4

Pain and difficulty in walking

Hip

Incongruent head

Hb 10, ESR 17, CRP negative

9

48

M

Genu valgus

3

Pain and restriction of movements

Knee

Narrow joint space, osteophytes

Hb13, CRP negative, ESR-9

10

50

M

Coxa vara

8

Pain and difficulty in walking

Hip

Incongruent head

Hb 13, ESR 06, CRP negative

11

36

F

Coxa vara

2

Pain and difficulty in walking

Hip

Incongruent head, collapse

Hb 12, ESR 08, CRP negative

12

28

M

Trauma

3

Pain and restriction of movements

Knee

Narrow joint space, osteophytes

Hb-11 CRP negative, ESR-10

13

50

M

Coxa vara

3

Pain and difficulty in walking

Hip

Narrow joint space, marginal osteophytes

Hb 11, ESR 08, CRP negative

14

49

M

Trauma

2

Pain and difficulty in walking

Hip

Incongruent head, collapse

Hb 12, ESR 08, CRP negative

15

37

M

Alcoholic

1

Pain and difficulty in walking

Hip

Narrow joint space, marginal osteophytes

Hb 14, ESR 09, CRP negative

16

44

F

Obese

2

Pain and restriction of movements

Knee

Narrow joint space, osteophytes

Hb-14 CRP negative, ESR-08

17

49

F

Obese

4

Pain and restriction of movements

Knee

Narrow joint space, osteophytes

Hb-12 CRP negative, ESR-13

18

42

M

Coxa vara, alcoholic

1

Pain and difficulty in walking

Hip

Incongruent head, collapse

Hb 12, ESR 17, CRP negative

19

48

M

Genu varum

1

Pain and restriction of movements

Knee

Narrow joint space, osteophytes

Hb13, CRP negative, ESR-9

20

49

M

Coxa vara

3

Pain and difficulty in walking

Hip

Incongruent head, marginal osteophytes

Hb 11, ESR 16, CRP negative

21

46

F

Coxa varum

2

Pain and difficulty in walking

Hip

Incongruent head, collapse of head

Hb 11, ESR 18, CRP negative

22

48

M

Trauma

2

Pain and restriction of movements

Knee with varus

Narrow joint space, osteophytes, varus stress positive

Hb-14 CRP negative, ESR-10

23

49

M

genu varum

2

Pain and difficulty in walking

Knee

Narrow joint space, osteophytes

Hb 11, ESR 11, CRP negative

24

47

M

Coxa vara

3

Pain and difficulty in walking

Hip

Incongruent head

Hb 14, ESR 13, CRP positive

25

48

M

Genu varum

3

Pain and restriction of movements

Knee

Narrow joint space, osteophytes

Hb-13 CRP negative, ESR-12

26

49

M

Genu varum

2

Pain and restriction of movements

Knee

Narrow joint space, osteophytes

Hb-13 CRP negative, ESR-09

27

46

F

Obese

6

Pain and restriction of movements

Knee

Narrow joint space, osteophytes

Hb-11 CRP negative, ESR-18

28

48

M

Coxa vara

2

Pain and difficulty in walking

Hip

Incongruent head

Hb 15, ESR 15, CRP negative

29

49

M

Genu varum

1

Pain and restriction of movements

Knee

Narrow joint space, osteophytes

Hb12, CRP negative, ESR-8

30

40

M

Coxa valgum

2

Pain and difficulty in walking

Hip

Incongruent head

Hb 11, ESR 08, CRP negative

 

 

Figure 1: Shows in left knee genu valgus with osteoarthritis changes showing narrowing of joint space, osteophytes, sub chondral sclerosis

 

 

Figure 2: Shows in right, knee genu valgus with osteoarthritis changes showing narrowing of joint space, osteophytes, sub chondral sclerosis

 

 

Figure 3: Shows in right, knee genu valgus with osteoarthritis changes showing narrowing of joint space, osteophytes, sub chondral sclerosis

DISCUSSION

Osteoarthritis also referred to as degenerative arthritis is an age-related process, however osteoarthritis can be observed in young active individuals due to developmental deformities, trauma, obesity, intense physical activity and genetic diseases such as haemochromatosis, ochronosis which can initiate degenerative changes in the joints [11]. Regards to trauma and its role in arthritis, knee injury involving anterior cruciate ligament, meniscus and microfractures of cartilage appears to be the key and surgery to repair the ligament tear doesn’t point to reduction in the chance for development of arthritis [12]. Arthritis of HIP clearly is more related to dysplasia or developmental defects of HIP compared to injury even though injury due to rigorous activity is linked rather than to routine activities [13]. Obesity contributes to joint damage not only by mechanical stress but by biochemical means, through release of various proinflammatory cytokines (IL-6) from synovial fibroblasts mediated by leptin released from somatic adipose tissue [14]. In the present study arthritis is noted in young patient (28 years) due to joint trauma which is in comparison to studies from Australia where in sports injuries are rampant in young population with attendant risk of arthritis [15]. Literature has pointed out that various conservative interventions such as orthotic devices/braces has helped to reduce joint burden due to various developmental and malalignment conditions by reducing symptoms and improving functional levels of joints which proves that these conditions contribute to arthritis [16]. The frequency of malalignment conditions in the present study is higher (73. 3%), while obesity (13. 2%) is lower and trauma (10%) is higher compared to other studies [17]. The clinical differences in the onset and presentation of disease between young and old arthritis patients points to the fact that young patients can withstand pain for longer (even though it affects their physical and mental wellbeing) before seeking the help of clinician and also various conservative therapies (muscle strengthening exercise, weight loss, orthotic devices/braces, tibial osteotomy) should be offered along with early identification of risk factors in this sub set of patients contributes to overall wellbeing. While surgery is advised only after 55 years of age keeping in mind the limited life of prosthetic joint and to avoid complications such as prosthetic joint failure in young due to their active life style which may warrant revision surgery [18]. The role of genetics in the causation of osteoarthritis in young is emphasized by the fact that the disease is more frequent in monozygotic twins, those with family history of disease at early age, all linked to specific gene loci revealed by genome wide association studies and risk is postulated to be due to variation in the regulation of gene expression [19]. The beneficial effects of exercise on arthritis are through inhibition of inflammation, slowing ECM degradation in cartilage, prevention of apoptosis, favouring autophagy which has protective effect on joints, in addition to modification of ncRNA thereby controlling the gene expression that favour arthritis [20]. The association of Vitamin D deficiency and risk of Osteoarthritis in young is proposed as noted by low vitamin D levels in young osteoarthritis patients. These findings don’t predict the clinical severity of osteoarthritis in relation to low Vitamin D levels even though odds /chances of developing osteoarthritis are high [21]. Literature has suggested the utility of osteotomy in fibula in young primary osteoarthritis as proved by improvements noted by clinical, functional and radiological methods [22]. Studies performed on shoulder joint to assess risk factors for osteoarthritis in young age has revealed the role of BMI, Hypertension, polyarthritis and intense muscular activity of shoulder that can contribute to the mechanism of primary shoulder joint arthritis in young [23]. Bone remodelling in arthritis is evaluated by imaging techniques which can highlight the mechanisms of remodelling along with its clinical implications. In early remodelling phase MRI has value to detect subchondral bone sclerosis, while Ultrasonography is critical to delineate the pathological osteophytes of soft tissue and bone and CT scan is more superior to X ray in evaluation of structural pathological aspects [24].

 

 

Figure 4: Genu varus in left knee and with osteoarthritis changes showing narrowing of joint space, osteophytes, sub chondral sclerosis

 

 

Figure 5: Genu varus in right knee and with osteoarthritis changes showing narrowing of joint space, osteophytes, sub chondral sclerosis

 

 

Figure 6: Shows right side coxa vara with osteoarthritis changes showing narrowing of joint space, osteophytes, sub chondral sclerosis

 

 

Figure 7: Shows right side coxa vara and left side coxa valgus in each hip with osteoarthritis showing narrowing of joint space, osteophytes, sub chondral sclerosis

CONCLUSIONS

In the present study various risk factors for osteoarthritis has been identified. These modifiable conditions can be treated earlier or avoided by proper interventions to prevent or slow the joint damage and progressive disease.

REFERENCES

  1. Amoako, Adae O. and George Guntur A. Pujalte. “Osteoarthritis in young, active and athletic individuals.” Clinical Medicine Insights: Arthritis and Musculoskeletal Disorders, vol. 7, 2014, pp. 27-32. https://doi.org/10.4137/ CMAMD.S14386.
  2. Wilfong, Jessica M. et al. “Old before their time? The impact of osteoarthritis on younger adults.” Arthritis Care and Research, vol. 76, no. 10, 2024, pp. 1400-1408. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.25374.
  3. Jordan, J.M. et al. “Prevalence of knee symptoms and radiographic and symptomatic knee osteoarthritis in African Americans and Caucasians: The Johnston County Osteoarthritis Project.” Journal of Rheumatology, vol. 34, 2007, pp. 172-180.
  4. Cameron, K.L. et al. “Incidence of physician-diagnosed osteoarthritis among active-duty United States military service members.” Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 63, 2011, pp. 2974-2982. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.30498.
  5. Thorborg, K. et al. “Patient-reported outcome questionnaires for young to middle-aged adults with hip and groin disability: A systematic review of the clinimetric evidence.” British Journal of Sports Medicine, vol. 49, 2015, p. 812. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2014-094224.
  6. Sutton, Paul M. and Edward S. Holloway. “The young osteoarthritic knee: Dilemmas in management.” BMC Medicine, vol. 11, 2013, article 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-11-14.
  7. Antony, Benny et al. “Do early life factors affect the development of knee osteoarthritis in later life: A narrative review.” Arthritis Research and Therapy, vol. 18, 2016, article 202. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-016-1104-0.
  8. Berenbaum, F. “Osteoarthritis as an inflammatory disease (osteoarthritis is not osteoarthrosis!).” Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, vol. 21, 2013, pp. 16-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2012.11.012.
  9. Long, H. et al. “Prevalence trends of site-specific osteoarthritis from 1990 to 2019: Findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019.” Arthritis and Rheumatology, vol. 74, no. 7, 2022, pp. 1172-1183. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.42089.
  10. Felson, D.T. and R. Hodgson. “Identifying and treating preclinical and early osteoarthritis.” Rheumatic Disease Clinics of North America, vol. 40, no. 4, November 2014, pp. 699-710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rdc.2014.07.012.
  11. Driban, J.B. et al. “Osteoarthritis and aging: Young adults with osteoarthritis.” Current Epidemiology Reports, vol. 7, 2020, pp. 9-15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40471-020-00224-7.
  12. Suter, L.G. et al. “Projecting lifetime risk of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis and total knee replacement in individuals sustaining a complete anterior cruciate ligament tear in early adulthood.” Arthritis Care and Research, vol. 69, 2017, pp. 201-208. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.22940.
  13. Ackerman, Ilana N. et al. “Hip and knee osteoarthritis affects younger people, too.” Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy, vol. 47, no. 2, 2017, pp. 67-79. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2017.7286.
  14. Li, Kaitao. “Epidemiology of knee osteoarthritis in young adults.” Theoretical and Natural Science, vol. 17, no. 1, December 2023, pp. 201-208. https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-8818/17/20240686.
  15. Finch, C.F. et al. “Time to add a new priority target for child injury prevention? The case for an excess burden associated with sport and exercise injury: Population-based study.” BMJ Open, vol. 4, 2014, e005043. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen -2014-005043.
  16. Robert-Lachaine, Xavier et al. “Knee braces and foot orthoses multimodal 3-month treatment of medial knee osteoarthritis in a randomised crossover trial.” Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, vol. 32, 2024, pp. 2919-2930. https://doi.org/10.1002/ksa.12312.
  17. Acharya, Rucha N. and Hemal M. Patel. “Prevalence of the knee osteoarthritis risk factors among young adult population: An observational study.” International Journal of Health Sciences Research, vol. 13, no. 10, 2023, pp. 158-163. https://doi.org/10.52403/ijhsr.20231022.
  18. Finch, C.F. et al. “The incidence and burden of hospital-treated sports-related injury in people aged 15+ years in Victoria, Australia, 2004-2010: A future epidemic of osteoarthritis?” Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, vol. 23, 2015, pp. 1138-1143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2015.02.165.
  19. Rice, S.J. et al. “Interplay between genetics and epigenetics in osteoarthritis.” Nature Reviews Rheumatology, vol. 16, no. 5, 2020, pp. 268-281. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41584-020-0407-3.
  20. Kong, Hui et al. “Exercise for osteoarthritis: A literature review of pathology and mechanism.” Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, vol. 14, 2022, article 854026. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2022.854026.
  21. Tripathy, Sujit Kumar et al. “Association of vitamin D and knee osteoarthritis in younger individuals.” World Journal of Orthopedics, vol. 11, no. 10, October 2020, pp. 418-425. https://doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v11.i10.418.
  22. Gore, Pravin Jayram et al. “A prospective study of proximal fibular osteotomy in young primary medial osteoarthritis knee and its clinical, functional and radiological outcome.” Global Journal for Research Analysis, vol. 11, no. 8, August 2022. https://doi.org/10.36106/gjra.
  23. Plachel, Fabian et al. “Patient-specific risk profile associated with early-onset primary osteoarthritis of the shoulder: Is it really primary?” Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, vol. 143, no. 2, February 2023, pp. 699-706. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-04125-2.
  24. Dudaric, L. et al. “Bone remodeling in osteoarthritis—Biological and radiological aspects.” Medicina, vol. 59, 2023, article 1613. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59091613.
Recommended Articles
Research Article In-Press

Transthyretin: Molecular Functions, Immunological Roles and Its Involvement in Amyloidogenesis

pdf Download PDF
Research Article

Practices and Challenges of Emergency Nurses in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Survey

Published: 05/01/2026
pdf Download PDF
Research Article In-Press

Job Satisfaction among Health Professionals Working at Makkah Primary Healthcare Centres: A Cross-Sectional Observational Study

...
pdf Download PDF
Research Article In-Press

A Pilot Study on the Effectiveness of Snoezelen Therapy on Behavioral Patterns in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder

...
pdf Download PDF
Copyright © Journal of Pioneering Medical Sciences until unless otherwise.