Background: Vitamin D deficiency (VDD) is a significant public health concern, particularly in Saudi Arabia, where limited sunlight exposure, cultural clothing practices and dietary patterns contribute to high prevalence rates. Individuals with chronic haematological disorders specifically those with transfusion-dependent sickle cell anaemia (SCA) face heightened risk owing to increased metabolic demands, chronic haemolysis and restricted mobility. This study aimed to assess and compare serum vitamin D [25(OH)D] levels between transfusion-dependent SCA patients and age- and sex-matched healthy controls in the Al-Qunfudah region, southwestern Saudi Arabia. Methods: A cross-sectional case-control study was conducted between November 2024 and March 2025 at Al-Mudilif General Hospital, Al-Qunfudah. One hundred participants were enrolled: 50 transfusion-dependent SCA patients and 50 healthy controls. Serum 25(OH)D levels were measured by electrochemiluminescence immunoassay. Between-group comparisons were performed using the independent samples t-test, with statistical significance set at p<0.05. Results: The mean serum 25(OH)D level was 11.7±4.66 ng/mL in patients versus 31.16±5.89 ng/mL in controls (95% CI for difference: 17.18-21.74 ng/mL; p<0.001). Patients also exhibited significantly lower haemoglobin (8.17±1.60 vs. 13.79±1.10 g/dL), haematocrit (24.12±5.66 vs. 40.74±4.91%) and red blood cell counts (3.09±0.93 vs. 4.59±0.76 ×10⁶/µL) compared with controls (all p<0.001). Conclusion: Serum vitamin D levels are markedly lower in transfusion-dependent SCA patients in Al-Qunfudah than in healthy individuals. VDD represents a prevalent and potentially modifiable comorbidity in this population. Routine vitamin D screening and targeted supplementation should be integrated into standard clinical care for high-risk SCA patients.
Sickle cell anaemia (SCA) is a chronic autosomal-recessive haemoglobinopathy characterised by significant morbidity, including vaso-occlusive crises, chronic haemolysis and multi-organ complications. It is particularly prevalent in regions with a high carrier frequency of haemoglobin S, including western Saudi Arabia [1].
Vitamin D deficiency (VDD) is highly prevalent in Saudi Arabia due to limited sun exposure, cultural clothing practices and dietary insufficiency. Individuals with SCA are especially vulnerable to VDD because of chronic haemolysis, impaired vitamin D metabolism, reduced physical activity and frequent hospitalisations [2,3]. Saudi Arabia has reported some of the world's highest rates of VDD, a burden that extends to patients with haematological disorders [4].
VDD in SCA patients has been linked to adverse outcomes including bone fragility, increased frequency of vaso-occlusive pain crises and heightened susceptibility to infections [5,6]. Despite growing evidence for the clinical relevance of vitamin D status in SCA, population-specific data from Al-Qunfudah a region in southwestern Saudi Arabia with a documented high prevalence of SCA remain scarce. This study was therefore conducted to provide region-specific evidence to guide clinical screening and supplementation practice.
Objectives
The objectives of this study were:
Study Design and Setting
This cross-sectional case-control study was conducted at Al-Mudilif General Hospital, a tertiary care centre in Al-Qunfudah, Saudi Arabia, between November 2024 and March 2025.
Study Population
A total of 100 participants were recruited and assigned to two groups:
Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria
Inclusion criteria:
Exclusion criteria:
Data Collection and Sample Handling
Demographic data, medical history and transfusion frequency were collected through structured patient interviews and review of medical records. Blood samples were collected under sterile conditions: EDTA-anticoagulated tubes for complete blood count (CBC) analysis and plain clot-activator tubes for serum vitamin D assay. Serum samples were obtained by centrifugation at 3,000 rpm for 10 minutes at room temperature and stored at −20 °C until analysis. For control participants, samples were collected at the time of blood donation.
No participant data were missing; all 100 enrolled participants provided complete haematological and biochemical data.
Laboratory Analysis
CBC analysis was performed on a Sysmex XN-550 automated haematology analyser. Serum 25(OH)D was measured on a Roche Cobas e411 immunochemistry analyser using electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (ECLIA). Both analysers underwent routine calibration and quality-control verification prior to sample testing. Vitamin D status was classified according to Endocrine Society guidelines [7]:
Statistical Analysis
Data were analysed using IBM SPSS Statistics, version 26. Continuous variables are reported as mean±standard deviation (SD). Normality was assessed using the Shapiro-Wilk test; all variables were normally distributed. The independent samples t-test was therefore selected as the appropriate parametric method for between-group comparisons of two independent samples. Results are reported with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) and p-values. A p-value<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Selection Bias Considerations
Control participants were recruited from blood donors, who are routinely screened and may represent a healthier subset of the general population. This may have introduced selection bias, potentially leading to an overestimation of the difference in vitamin D levels between groups. Readers should interpret between-group comparisons with this limitation in mind.
All 100 enrolled participants (50 patients, 50 controls) provided complete data; no missing values were recorded. Key trends are highlighted below.
Haematological Parameters Patient Group
Table 1 presents CBC parameters for the patient group. All haematological indices were below normal reference ranges, consistent with the chronic haemolytic anaemia of SCA. Mean haemoglobin was 8.17±1.60 g/dL, mean haematocrit was 24.12±5.66% and mean RBC count was 3.09±0.93 ×10⁶/µL.
Table 1: CBC results for the patient group (transfusion-dependent SCA; n = 50)
|
Parameter |
Normal Range |
Mean |
Std. Deviation |
Minimum |
Maximum |
|
HB (g/dL) |
F: 12.3-15.7 | M: 13.5-17.0 |
8.17 |
1.60 |
4.2 |
10.9 |
|
HCT (%) |
F: 37-46 | M: 42-52 |
24.12 |
5.66 |
11.6 |
36.6 |
|
RBC (×10⁶/µL) |
4.0-5.2 |
3.09 |
0.93 |
1.28 |
5.00 |
F: Female, M: Male, HB: Haemoglobin, HCT: Haematocrit, RBC: Red blood cells
Haematological Parameters Control Group
Table 2 presents CBC parameters for the control group. All values fell within normal reference ranges, confirming the health status of enrolled controls.
Table 2: CBC results for the control group (healthy adults; n = 50)
|
Parameter |
Normal Range |
Mean |
Std. Deviation |
Minimum |
Maximum |
|
HB (g/dL) |
F: 12.3-15.7 | M: 13.5-17.0 |
13.79 |
1.10 |
12.3 |
17.1 |
|
HCT (%) |
F: 37-46 | M: 42-52 |
40.74 |
4.91 |
30.0 |
54.0 |
|
RBC (×10⁶/µL) |
4.0-5.2 |
4.59 |
0.76 |
4.0 |
6.0 |
F: Female, M: Male, HB: Haemoglobin, HCT: Haematocrit, RBC: Red blood cells
Between-Group Comparison of Haematological Parameters
Table 3 shows between-group comparisons. Patients had significantly lower haemoglobin, haematocrit and RBC counts than controls (all p<0.001), reflecting the expected haematological burden of transfusion-dependent SCA.
Table 3: Between-group comparison of CBC parameters (patients vs. controls)
|
Parameter |
Reference Range |
Group |
N |
Mean |
Std. Deviation |
P value |
|
HB (g/dL) |
F: 12.3-15.7 M: 13.5-17.0 |
Patient |
50 |
8.17 |
1.60 |
<0.001 |
|
Control |
50 |
13.79 |
1.10 |
|||
|
HCT (%) |
F: 37-46 M: 42-52 |
Patient |
50 |
24.12 |
5.66 |
<0.001 |
|
Control |
50 |
40.74 |
4.91 |
|||
|
RBC (×10⁶/µL) |
4.0-5.2 |
Patient |
50 |
3.09 |
0.93 |
<0.001 |
|
Control |
50 |
4.59 |
0.76 |
Independent samples t-test, p<0.001 for all parameters
Serum Vitamin-D Patient Group
Table 4 presents 25(OH)D results for the patient group. The mean level of 11.74±4.66 ng/mL falls within the deficient category (<20 ng/mL) according to Endocrine Society criteria [7].
Table 4: Serum 25(OH)D results for the patient group (transfusion-dependent SCA; n = 50)
|
Parameter |
Reference Range |
Mean (ng/mL) |
Std. Deviation |
Minimum |
Maximum |
|
25(OH)D (ng/mL) |
30-100 ng/mL (Sufficient) |
11.74 |
4.66 |
4.0 |
23.0 |
25(OH)D: 25-hydroxyvitamin D, deficiency threshold: <20 ng/mL
Serum Vitamin D Control Group
Table 5 presents 25(OH)D results for the control group. The mean level of 31.16±5.89 ng/mL falls within the sufficient range (30-100 ng/mL).
Table 5: Serum 25(OH)D results for the control group (healthy adults; n = 50)
|
Parameter |
Reference Range |
Mean (ng/mL) |
Std. Deviation |
Minimum |
Maximum |
|
25(OH)D (ng/mL) |
30-100 ng/mL (Sufficient) |
31.16 |
5.89 |
25.0 |
50.0 |
25(OH)D: 25-hydroxyvitamin D, sufficiency range: 30-100 ng/mL
Between-Group Comparison of Serum Vitamin D
Table 6 demonstrates a statistically significant difference in 25(OH)D between groups (p<0.001). Patients had a mean level 19.42 ng/mL lower than controls (95% CI: 17.18-21.74 ng/mL), confirming a markedly higher prevalence of VDD in the patient group.
Table 6: Between-group comparison of serum 25(OH)D levels (patients vs. controls)
|
Parameter |
Reference Range |
Group |
N |
Mean (ng/mL) |
Std. Deviation |
p-value |
|
25(OH)D (ng/mL) |
30-100 ng/mL |
Patients |
50 |
11.74 |
4.66 |
<0.001 |
|
Controls |
50 |
31.16 |
5.89 |
Independent samples t-test, 95% CI for mean difference: 17.18-21.74 ng/mL, p<0.001
This study evaluated serum 25(OH)D levels and haematological parameters in transfusion-dependent SCA patients at Al-Mudilif General Hospital, Al-Qunfudah and compared them with healthy controls. The principal finding was that patients exhibited markedly lower vitamin D levels (mean 11.74 ng/mL, deficient range) compared with controls (mean 31.16 ng/mL, sufficient range), with a statistically significant between-group difference (p<0.001). This difference is clinically meaningful: all patient-group values fell below the deficiency threshold of 20 ng/mL.
Globally, VDD is well-documented in SCA. Chronic haemolysis, increased metabolic demands, reduced sunlight exposure secondary to pain-related immobility and prolonged hospitalisations are the primary contributing mechanisms [2,8]. A meta-analysis by Osunkwo et al. reported that 63.8% of SCD patients were vitamin D deficient, with significantly lower 25(OH)D concentrations than healthy controls [9]. Our findings are consistent with this global picture and with earlier Saudi Arabian data: Al-Jama et al. similarly identified high VDD rates among SCA patients in the Eastern Province [1] and Al-Saqladi et al. reported low 25(OH)D levels associated with bone pain and avascular necrosis in SCD patients [10]. The current study extends these observations to the Al-Qunfudah region, where no comparable data previously existed.
The clinical implications are substantial. Low vitamin D levels in SCA have been associated with increased vaso-occlusive pain crises, higher hospitalisation rates and reduced bone mineral density [12]. Randomised evidence supports the clinical benefit of high-dose vitamin D supplementation in reducing pain frequency in SCD [13]. Routine vitamin D screening and targeted supplementation should therefore be considered a standard component of care for transfusion-dependent SCA patients particularly given the feasibility and low cost of both assessment and intervention.
Genetic and disease heterogeneity may modulate vitamin D metabolism in Saudi SCD patients. The Arab-Indian haplotype, common in this population, is associated with milder disease expression and may affect vitamin D kinetics [11]. Future studies should explore haplotype-specific vitamin D metabolism to personalise supplementation strategies.
Vitamin D deficiency is highly prevalent among transfusion-dependent SCA patients in the Al-Qunfudah region, with mean 25(OH)D levels (11.74±4.66 ng/mL) substantially lower than those in healthy controls (31.16±5.89 ng/mL; p<0.001). VDD represents a prevalent and clinically important comorbidity in this population. Key recommendations for clinical practice are:
These findings are relevant beyond Al-Qunfudah: given the high background prevalence of VDD across Saudi Arabia, similar screening programmes are warranted in other regions managing SCA populations.
Strengths
This study provides the first vitamin D data from a transfusion-dependent SCA cohort in Al-Qunfudah, filling an important regional evidence gap. The inclusion of age- and sex-matched healthy controls, measurement of multiple haematological and biochemical parameters and use of validated laboratory platforms strengthen the validity of the findings.
Limitations
The following limitations should be considered when interpreting the findings:
No long-term follow-up: the clinical impact of VDD on pain frequency, hospitalisation rates and bone health outcomes over time could not be assessed.
Innovation and Contribution
To our knowledge, this is the first study to assess vitamin D status specifically in a transfusion-dependent SCA population in the Al-Qunfudah region of Saudi Arabia. The findings provide regional baseline data of immediate clinical relevance and support the case for integrating vitamin D screening into routine SCA management protocols across southwestern Saudi Arabia.
Implications for Practice
The high prevalence of VDD demonstrated in this study supports the implementation of routine vitamin D screening and supplementation programmes for transfusion-dependent SCA patients. Although the study was conducted in Al-Qunfudah, the findings are likely applicable to other Saudi Arabian regions given the nationally documented high background rates of VDD [4,8]. Healthcare providers managing SCA populations elsewhere in Saudi Arabia are encouraged to consider similar screening protocols adapted to their patient demographics.
Recommendations for Future Research
Future studies should:
Explore genotype-vitamin D interactions, particularly the influence of haemoglobin S haplotypes on 25(OH)D metabolism in Saudi SCA patients.
Ethical Statement
Ethical approval was granted by the Institutional Review Board of the Ministry of Health, Makkah Region, Saudi Arabia (IRB-Makkah; IRB No. H-02-K-076-1124-1201) on 06 November 2024. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants before enrolment. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.