Research Article | In-Press | Volume 15 Issue 2 (February, 2026) | Pages 151 - 157

Risk Factors of Osteoporosis among Premenopausal Females: A Cross-Sectional Study in Eastern Region, Hafr Al Batin, Saudi Arabia

 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
1
College of Nursing, Hafr Al Batin University, Saudi Arabia
2
Department of Nursing, College of Nursing and Health sciences, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia
3
Clinical Laboratory Department, College of Applied Medical Sciences, University of Hafr Al Batin, Saudi Arabia
4
Department of Nursing, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia
Under a Creative Commons license
Open Access

Abstract

Background: The term “silent disease” has been used to describe osteoporosis. That is because many osteoporotic patients are asymptomatic and often not aware of the impact of the disease on their bones until complications such as fractures occur. This study aimed to assess and investigate lifestyle risk factors related to osteoporosis development among university females. Method: A descriptive cross sectional research design was adopted for this study, which enlisted 265 women. A self-reported questionnaire about osteoporosis risk factors and lifestyle habits was used to collect data. Result: Mean age of participants was 34.63±9.18 and about two thirds were Saudi citizen. More than half of the study females don't participate in any type of physical activity, and most are exposed to less than half an hour of sunlight a day. A statistically significant relation was found between participants’ age, nationality, education level, occupation and marital status and their Body Mass Index where p. value was ˂0.05. Conclusion: The study findings highly recommend creating educational programs for osteoporosis to increase women’s awareness and therefore reduce the risk of developing osteoporosis.

Keywords
Osteoporosis, Lifestyle, Risk Factors, Females

INTRODUCTION

When density of bone mineral and bone masses declined, or when the composition and strength of bone altered, osteoporosis could develop which is a bone disease. Subsequently, that could result in decreasing bone strength and increasing risks for bone fractures. Among females, this condition could start a year or two before menopausal period [1].

 

Since bone loss frequently is asymptomatic, osteoporosis is known as a “silent disease" that can be reported in both sexes and increases with age [2]. However, most research on the condition has focused on women because they are more prevalent to occur in female. Recent research showed a higher incidence in men in one Saudi Arabia study [3, 4]. Osteoporosis is a prevalent chronic condition that affect one third of women and one fifth of men over 50 years of age [5]. It causes impaired bone density and quality, hence the name porous.

 

In Saudi Arabia, recent research found the disease in 52.8% of women and 63.6% of men in a hospita-based setting [4]. About 200 million people globally have osteoporosis, resulting in more than 8.9 million fractures [6]. An epidemiological situation in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia revealed that 34% of healthy women, and 30.7% of men 50-79 years of age, in the country, have osteoporosis [4,7]. With a reported increase in life expectancy in KSA from 4567 years in 1960 to 75.7 years in 2013, the prevalence of osteoporosis is expected to rise even further [8].

 

With osteoporosis, some risk factors cannot be changed (fixed), while others can change (modifiable). The non-modifiable risk factors of osteoporosis include age, gender, family history of osteoporosis, race, long-term glucocorticoid therapy and rheumatoid arthritis [9-12]. The modifiable factors include alcohol consumption, smoking status, deficiency of vitamin D, lack of nutrition, inadequate activity, and low intake of minerals. The identification ofall factors could help in establishment of appropriate preventive measures of osteoporosis [13-17].

 

Certainly, in a young female population, there is compelling evidence that other illnesses are major risk factors to the development of osteoporosis. These include autoimmune diseases like rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematous, and ankylosing spondylosis, as well as conditions including hyperthyroidism, celiac disease, and chronic renal disease. Both smoking and heavy alcohol consumption are also significant modifiable risk factors [5].

 

Calcium absorption and bone strength are mainly controlled by vitamin D. It is a significant risk factor in countries with less than temperate climates because sunshine is vital for vitamin D synthesis. Other influencing factors of osteoporosis are the use of certain drugs, known as secondary risk factors, such as corticosteroids, thyroxine, antacids and chemotherapies, especially aromatase inhibitors [18].

 

Lifestyle factors also play a major role in minimizing bone loss as we age: physical activity and diet are two factors [19]. In addition, an adequate and healthy diet and weight, also influences bone loss in postmenopausal women. The proportion of Saudi population over 50 years are expected to increase over the next decades ranging from 21% in 2020 to 26% in 2025 and to 30% in 2030 [20]. Additionally, life expectancy in Saudi Arabia is expected to rise from 63.1 years in the 1980s to 74.5 in 2015 and then to 79.4 by the year

 

2050 [20-22].

 

The main effective strategy for mitigating the burden of diseases is by implementing primary preventive measures [23]. Therefore, it is essential to increase public awareness about osteoporosis which could significantly help in early detection for the disease [24, 25]. This approach was mainly considered by the Ministry of Health in Saudi Arabia which set a strategy for prevention and management of the condition [26].

 

Aim of the Study

This study aimed to assess risk factors related to osteoporosis among university females in Saudi Arabia.

METHODS

Study Design

This is a cross-sectional study design; it was conducted among university females. A survey was carried out to collect data on risk factors related to osteoporosis development. The survey comprised three parts. The first part was for demographics such as age, occupation, education level, marital status, age of menarche and obstetrical history. The second part was for assessing the Body Mass Index (BMI) using digital beam scale then classified according to a 2000 WHO report [27] as: Underweight (BMI under 18.5 kg/m^2), normal weight (BMI greater than or equal to 18.5 to 24.9 kg/m^2), Overweight (BMI greater than or equal to 25 to 29.9 kg/m^2), and Obesity (BMI greater than or equal to 30 kg/m^2). Then obesity classified into: Obesity class I (BMI 30 to 34.9 kg/m^2), Obesity class II (BMI 35 to 39.9 kg/m^2), and Obesity class III (BMI greater than or equal to 40 kg/m2 (also referred to as severe, extreme, or massive obesity). The third part was for assessing lifestyle habits like exercise, exposure to sunlight, vitamin D and calcium supplements, and soft drinks.

 

The tool used in this study was developed to collect data. A comprehensive pilot and testing were done to ensure the tool is valid and reliable. The Cronbach’s alpha was acceptable at ≥0.80. Also, the tool was revised by experts in nursing field, and an orthopedic specialist to ensure its clarity and validity for measuring the variables of the study.

 

Participants

This study employed a non-probability convenient sampling method to select females’ from different colleges affiliated to University of Hafr Al Batin, Saudi Arabia. The participants were provided with a brief explanation about the study objective and assured that their participation is voluntary. Informed consents were obtained from each participant using developed form.

 

Data Collection

The data was collected by a self-administered survey. All participants were asked to check their body weights and heights for BMI measurements using the digital beam scale. The data collected was done on December 15, 2022, to the end of January 2023.

 

Data Analysis

Data was analyzed using SPSS version 22.0 [Statistical Package for Social Science]. Descriptive statistics were expressed as number, percentage, mean, and standard deviation. Chi- square test was used to compare qualitative variables. Pearson correlation was done to measure correlation between quantitative variables. P-value is considered statistically significant when (p<0.05).

 

Ethical considerations

An ethical approval was taken from the Local Research Ethics Committee at Hafr Al Batin University on 15.11.2022, the approval code given to the protocol of the study was UHB-001-10-2022. Informed consent was obtained from female participated in the study before enrolling the study.

RESULTS

Table 1 shows that the study sample mean age was [34.63±9.18], around one third aged (30-<40) years, and 29.8 % were in the age group ≥40 years. Nearly two thirds of the study participants were Saudi citizens. More than half were single, and MSc and PhD holders. Additionally, more than one third of participants were academic staff, while the rest were administrative workers. Also, more than one third reported their age of menarche were at <13 years.

 

Table 1: Distribution of Participants’ Sociodemographic Characteristics

Parameters

No. (265)

Percentage

Age: (years)

20 - <30

99

37.4

30 - <40

87

32.8

≥40

79

29.8

Mean±SD (Range) 34.63±9.18 (20.0-55.0)

Nationality

Saudi

192

72.5

Non-Saudi

73

27.5

Educational level

Secondary

13

4.9

University

110

41.5

Postgraduate

142

53.6

College

Medical

131

49.4

Scientific and engineering

73

27.5

Humanities and education

61

23.0

Occupation

Academic staff

115

43.4

Administrative worker

150

56.6

Age of menarche

˂13 year

103

38.9

≥13 year

162

61.1

Marital status

Single

149

56.2

Married

99

37.4

Divorced

17

6.4

Gravidity

<3

63

54.3

≥3

53

45.7

Parity

<3

72

62.1

≥3

44

37.9

 

Concerning lifestyle practices, results showed that 42.3% of respondents don't do any kind of physical activity. Most of them reported exposure to less than an hour of sunlight daily.

 

Moreover, around half reported taking vitamin D/Calcium supplements. Additionally, nearly one third of study participants reported consuming dairy products less than 2 times /week, while 26.8%, reported consuming proteins 5 or more times /week.

 

A significant number of respondents mentioned drinking soft drinks daily; most of them consume one can/day (Table 2).

 

Table 2: Lifestyle Practices of the Study Participants

Parameters

No. (265)

Percentage

Do you practice any kind of physical activity?

Yes

153

57.7

No

112

42.3

How many times do you exercise/ week?

3 times per week

103

67.3

˃ 3 times per week

50

32.7

How long do you expose yourself to sunlight daily?

˂half an hour

180

67.9

≥half an hour

85

32.1

Do take vitamin D and Calcium supplements?

Yes

128

48.3

No

137

51.7

How many times do you eat dairy products/week?

˂2 times per week

86

32.5

2-4 times per week

113

42.6

≥5 times per week 66

24.9

How many times do you eat proteins (meat, poultry, fish, etc.) / week?

˂2 times per week

63

23.8

2-4 times per week

49.4

≥5 times per week

26.8

Do you drink soft drinks daily?

Yes

116

43.8

No

149

56.2

How many times a day do you drink soft drinks?

1 can

79

68.1

2 cans or cups

37

31.9

 

In relation to the classification of study sample BMI, a significant proportion 49.4% of respondents had normal BMI, 27.6% were overweight, and 15.8% of them classified as had obesity class I (Table 3).

 

Table 3: Bmi Classifications of the Study Respondents

BMI

No. (265)

%

Normal

131

49.4

Overweight

73

27.6

Obesity:

61

23.0

Class I

42

15.8

Class II

16

6.0

Class III

3

1.1

Mean±SD (Range)

26.11±5.50 (18.55-48.89)

-

 

Moreover, a statistically significant relationship was found between study participants BMI and their nationality, education level, occupation, and marital status where p. value was 0.004, 0.043, 0.038, 0.007 and 0.000 respectively (Table 4)

 

Table 4: Relation Between Sociodemographic Data of the Studied Respondents and BMI

Sociodemographic data

BMI

p-value

Normal (n = 131)

Overweight (n= 73)

Obese (n= 61)

No.

%

No.

%

No.

%

Age: (years)

20 - <30

56

56.6

26

26.3

17

17.2

0.3213

30 - <40

41

47.1

25

28.7

21

24.1

≥40

34

43.0

22

27.8

23

29.1

Nationality:

Saudi

102

53.1

56

29.2

34

17.7

0.004*

Non-Saudi

29

39.7

17

23.3

27

37.0

Educational level:

Secondary/ University

70

56.9

32

26.0

21

17.1

0.043*

Postgraduate

61

43.0

41

28.9

40

28.2

College:

Medical

71

54.2

33

25.2

27

20.6

0.271

Scientific and engineering

29

39.7

26

35.6

18

24.7

Humanities and education

31

50.8

14

23.0

16

26.2

Occupation:

Academic staff

53

46.1

27

23.5

35

30.4

0.038*

Administrative worker

78

52.0

46

30.7

26

17.3

Age of menarche:

Less than 13

53

51.5

26

25.2

24

23.3

0.791

More than or equal 13

78

48.1

47

29.0

37

22.8

Marital status:

Married

27

27.3

37

37.4

35

35.4

0.000*

Not married

104

62.7

36

21.7

26

15.7

Gravidity:

<3

19

30.2

27

42.9

17

27.0

0.422

≥3

12

22.6

21

39.6

20

37.7

Parity:

<3

19

26.4

30

41.7

23

31.9

0.994

≥3

12

27.3

18

40.9

14

31.8

*Chi-square test

 

Table 5 shows the relationship between participants lifestyle practices and classifications of BMI, and it was noticed that there is a highly statistically significant relation between practicing physical activity and obesity classifications where p-value = 0.000

 

Table 5: Relation between lifestyle practices of respondents and BMI

Lifestyle practices

BMI

Normal (n = 131)

Overweight (n = 73)

Obese (n = 61)

p-value

No

%

No

%

No

%

Do you practice any kind of physical activity?

Yes

92

60.1

42

27.5

19

12.4

0.000*

No

39

34.8

31

27.7

42

37.5

How many times do you exercise/ week?

3 times per week

64

62.1

27

26.2

12

11.7

0.765

More than 3 times per week

28

56.0

15

30.0

7

14.0

How long do you expose yourself to sunlight daily?

Less than half an hour

86

47.8

51

28.3

43

23.9

0.733

Half an hour or more

45

52.9

22

25.9

18

21.2

Do you take vitamin D and Calcium supplements?

Yes

65

50.8

40

31.3

23

18.0

0.131

No

66

48.2

33

24.1

38

27.7

How many times do you take dairy products / week?

Less than 2 times per week

44

51.2

25

29.1

17

19.8

0.656

2-4 times per week

52

46.0

34

30.1

27

23.9

5 or more times per week

35

53.0

14

21.2

17

25.8

How many times do you eat protein / week?

Less than 2 times per week

36

57.1

21

33.3

6

9.5

0.054

2-4 times per week

61

46.6

32

24.4

38

29.0

5 or more times per week

34

47.9

20

28.2

17

23.9

Do you drink soft drinks daily?

Yes

59

50.9

28

24.1

29

25.0

0.520

No

72

48.3

45

30.2

32

21.5

How many times a day do you drink soft drinks?

1 can

34

43.0

19

24.1

26

32.9

0.010*

2 cans or cups

25

67.6

9

24.3

3

8.1

*Chi-square test

DISCUSSION

As osteoporosis is prevalent health condition in many countries including Saudi Arabia, implementing appropriate preventive strategies at young age, could be an effective in mitigating the condition. This study aims to identify the risks factors related to osteoporosis in Saudi Arabia.

 

According to the current study’s results about one third of participants were aged 31-40 years. Most were Saudi citizens, and more than half were married.

 

The current study revealed a remarkably high percentage of respondents don't practice any type of physical activity. Additionally, the findings revealed a significant relation between practicing physical activity and BMI. These findings are in line with a prior Saudi study in which most female participants reported low physical exercise [29]. Notably, this finding was less than that reported by Hammad and Benajiba, 2017, where 61% of women in that study did not exercise [30]. Miserably, this is a challenging reality to public health in Saudi Arabia as stated by previous studies [31, 32].

 

Table 6: Multiple Logistic Regression Analysis of Overweight/ Obesity Risk Factors

Parameters

p-value

OR

95% C.I.

Lower

Upper

Age (years)

0.186

1.023

0.989

1.058

Nationality (non-Saudi)

0.665

0.850

0.407

1.774

Education (Postgraduate)

0.228

1.468

0.787

2.738

Occupation (Academic staff)

0.140

0.594

0.297

1.187

Marital status (Married)

0.000*

3.870

2.111

7.094

Physical activity (No practice)

0.002*

2.396

1.381

4.157

 

Although Saudi Arabia is a sunny country, most respondents reported less than half an hour of exposure to sunlight daily. This finding is consistent with that reported by Barzanji et al, Al-Otaibi, and Mahboub et al [29, 31, 33]. On the other hand, our study’s findings contradict the results from the Egyptian study, which indicating that Egyptian females are daily exposed to sunlight [34]. The exposure to sunlight has been justified by low level of awareness, hot climate and limited outdoor activities. It is well established that sun exposure helps maintain bone health by promoting vitamin D synthesis. Another supported study findings by Elgzaar et al 2023 emphasize that although various studies have documented that 15 min of direct sun exposure each day is a critical step in preventing osteoporosis, this item was the lowest on average among the study participants and mention that lack of exposure to sunlight may be attributed to the hot climate in most regions of Saudi Arabia. At the same time, a sedentary lifestyle and socioeconomic well-being also contributed to a lack of sun exposure and regular physical activity or walking at least half an hour per day [35].

 

Another strategy for prevention is taking a lot of calcium [36], which is crucial for bone health and structure [37]. It was also reported that more than one third of study participants take dairy products 2-4 times per week. In the same line a study in Saudi Arabia, by Hammad and Benajiba, found that 91% of young ladies consumed milk and dairy products less than two times per week [30] and also another study by Al Qauhiz [38]. The study findings by Al Daghri et al 2023 showed that the people take low dairy products [39]. Another study findings showed that only 31.1% took dairy products and 17.7% consumed calcium supplements [40].

 

Another issue is consumption of soft drinks. According to Euromonitor International Country report, Saudi Arabia is the largest consumer of soft drinks in the Middle East and that request is growing [41]. The current study confirms that more than one third of respondents reported drinking soft drinks daily [79.4% of them consume one can /day]. In another study conducted by Hammad and Benajiba 2017, the findings shows that soft drinks were highly and continually consumed by female University scholars either relatively [more than two cans/week] or regularly [>than 3 and large cans/day] [30].

 

BMI is an important factor in bone mineral density measurements. Until recently, individuals with a high BMI had some protection against fractures [42]. The current study shows that about one third were overweight, 30.6% were obese and 21.8% of them were classified as obesity class I.

 

Understanding the multifactorial causes may help in developing adequate intervention with a focus on the importance of assuming a healthy lifestyle based on regular physical activity, reducing consumption of soft drinks, as well as ensuring an adequate intake of vitamin D and Calcium.

CONCLUSIONS

This study documents the main lifestyle factors that may lead to osteoporosis among young-adult Saudi women. More than one third of respondents consume soft drinks and most of them daily. Additionally, more than have of them don't practice any type of physical activity. Lack of exposure to sunlight daily and decrease taking calcium and vitamin D supplementation were noticed. This research data could be the basis for nutrition education intervention to improve lifestyle habits and promote healthy bones in later life. Thus, to prevent osteoporosis among the adult population, it is necessary to have an initial understanding about the knowledge, attitude, and practices of young adults towards preventive measures of osteoporosis.

 

Limitations of the Study

Convenience sampling technique used in the sample selection considered as a limitation affecting representativeness of the sample.

 

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

 

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all students who participated in the study before enrolling in the study.

 

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study can be available on request from the corresponding author. The data is not publicly available due to ethical and privacy restrictions.

 

Declaration of conflicting interests

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

 

Acknowledgement

Authors gratefully acknowledge all participants agreed to share in the study.

REFERENCES

  1. National Institutes of Health. “Osteoporosis causes and symptoms.” Accessed December 2022.
  2. Elonheimo, H. et al. “Environmental substances are associated with osteoporosis: a scoping review.” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 18, no. 2, 2021, pp. 738.
  3. Conti, V. et al. “A polymorphism at the translation start site of the vitamin D receptor gene is associated with the response to anti-osteoporotic therapy in postmenopausal women from southern Italy.” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 16, no. 3, 2015, pp. 5452–5466.
  4. Sadat-Ali, M. et al. “Osteoporosis: is the prevalence increasing in Saudi Arabia.” Annals of African Medicine, vol. 21, no. 1, 2022, pp. 54–57.
  5. Keen, M.U. and Reddivari, A.K.R. “Osteoporosis in females.” In: StatPearls. 2023.
  6. Saleh, Y.A. et al. “Incidence of hip fracture in Saudi Arabia and the development of a FRAX model.” Archives of Osteoporosis, vol. 17, no. 1, 2022, pp. 56.
  7. Sadat-Ali, M. et al. “An epidemiological analysis of the incidence of osteoporosis and osteoporosis-related fractures among the Saudi Arabian population.” Annals of Saudi Medicine, vol. 32, no. 6, 2012, pp. 637–641.
  8. World Health Organization. “Saudi Arabia health profile 2013.”
  9. Kanis, J.A. et al. “Ten-year probabilities of osteoporotic fractures according to BMD and diagnosis thresholds.” Osteoporosis International, vol. 12, no. 12, 2001, pp. 989–995.
  10. Kanis, J.A. et al. “A family history of fracture and fracture risk: a meta-analysis.” Bone, vol. 35, no. 5, 2004, pp. 1029–1037.
  11. Kanis, J.A. et al. “A meta-analysis of previous fracture and fracture risk.” Bone, vol. 35, no. 2, 2004, pp. 375–382.
  12. Kanis, J.A. et al. “A meta-analysis of prior corticosteroid use and fracture risk.” Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, vol. 19, no. 6, 2004, pp. 893–899.
  13. Kanis, J.A. et al. “Alcohol intake as a risk factor for fracture.” Osteoporosis International, vol. 16, no. 7, 2005, pp. 737–742.
  14. Kanis, J.A. et al. “Smoking and fracture risk: a meta-analysis.” Osteoporosis International, vol. 16, no. 2, 2005, pp. 155–162.
  15. Edmonds, E. et al. “Osteoporosis knowledge, beliefs, and calcium intake of college students: utilization of the health belief model.” Open Journal of Preventive Medicine, vol. 2, no. 1, 2012, pp. 27–34.
  16. Ahmad, M.S. et al. “Review of the risk factor of osteoporosis in the Malaysian population.” RUMes, vol. 3, no. 1, 2014, pp. 77–82.
  17. Al Wahhabi, B.K. “Osteoporosis in Saudi Arabia.” Saudi Medical Journal, vol. 36, no. 10, 2015, pp. 1149–1150.
  18. Mitek, T. et al. “Genetic predisposition for osteoporosis and fractures in postmenopausal women.” Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol. 1211, 2019, pp. 17–24.
  19. Kohrt, W.M. et al. “American College of Sports Medicine position stand: physical activity and bone health.” Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, vol. 36, no. 11, 2004, pp. 1985–1996.
  20. World Bank. “Health nutrition and population statistics data.” 2023.
  21. United Nations. “World population ageing.” 2019.
  22. Saleh, M. et al. “Bone mineral density of the spine and femur in healthy Saudis.” Osteoporosis International, vol. 16, no. 1, 2005, pp. 43–55.
  23. Amin, S. and Mukti, N.A. “Assessment of knowledge level on osteoporosis among private university students in Malaysia.” Imperial Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, vol. 3, no. 3, 2017, pp. 141–145.
  24. Toh, L.S. et al. “The development and validation of the osteoporosis prevention and awareness tool (OPAAT) in Malaysia.” PLoS One, vol. 10, no. 5, 2015, e0124553.
  25. Von Hurst, P.R. and Wham, C.A. “Attitudes and knowledge about osteoporosis risk prevention: a survey of New Zealand women.” Public Health Nutrition, vol. 10, no. 7, 2007, pp. 747–753.
  26. Ministry of Health. “National plan for osteoporosis prevention and management in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.” 2018.
  27. World Health Organization. “Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic.” 2000.
  28. International Osteoporosis Foundation. “IOF osteoporosis risk check.” 2021.
  29. Barzanji, A.T. et al. “Osteoporosis: A study of knowledge, attitude and practice among adults in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.” Journal of Community Health, vol. 38, no. 6, 2013, pp. 1098–1105.
  30. Hammad, L. and Benajiba, N. “Lifestyle factors influencing bone health in young adult women in Saudi Arabia.” African Health Sciences, vol. 17, no. 2, 2017, pp. 524–531.
  31. Mahboub, S.M. et al. “Evaluation of the prevalence and correlated factors for decreased bone mass density among pre- and post-menopausal educated working women in Saudi Arabia.” Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition, vol. 32, no. 3, 2014, pp. 513–519.
  32. Al-Eisa, E.S. and Al-Sobayel, H.I. “Physical activity and health beliefs among Saudi women.” Journal of Nutrition and Metabolism, vol. 2012, no. 1, 2012, Article ID 642187.
  33. Al-Otaibi, H. “Osteoporosis health beliefs, knowledge and life habits among women in Saudi Arabia.” Open Journal of Preventive Medicine, vol. 5, no. 6, 2015, pp. 236–243.
  34. Mortada, E.M. et al. “Knowledge, health beliefs and osteoporosis preventive behavior among women of reproductive age in Egypt.” Malaysian Journal of Medicine and Health Sciences, vol. 16, no. 1, 2020, pp. 9–16.
  35. Elgzar, W.T. et al. “Determinant of osteoporosis preventive behaviors among perimenopausal women: a cross-sectional study to explore the role of knowledge and health beliefs.” Nutrients, vol. 15, no. 13, 2023, pp. 3052.
  36. Borer, K. “Physical activity in the prevention and amelioration of osteoporosis in women: interaction of mechanical, hormonal and dietary factors.” Sports Medicine, vol. 35, no. 9, 2005, pp. 779–830.
  37. International Osteoporosis Foundation. “Modifiable risks.” 2023.
  38. Al Qauhiz, N.M. “Obesity among Saudi female university students: dietary habits and health behaviors.” Journal of the Egyptian Public Health Association, vol. 85, no. 1–2, 2010, pp. 45–59.
  39. Al-Daghri, N.M. et al. “Dietary calcium intake and osteoporosis risk in Arab adults.” Nutrients, vol. 15, no. 13, 2023, pp. 2829.
  40. Chan, C.Y. et al. “Knowledge, beliefs, dietary, and lifestyle practices related to bone health among middle-aged and elderly Chinese in Klang Valley, Malaysia.” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 16, no. 10, 2019, pp. 1787.
  41. Euromonitor International. “Soft drinks in Saudi Arabia.” 2022.
  42. Felson, D.T. et al. “Effects of weight and body mass index on bone mineral density in men and women: The Framingham study.” Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, vol. 8, no. 5, 1993, pp. 567–573.
Recommended Articles
Research Article In-Press

Investigation of CD8, CD20 and their Correlation with Heat Shock Protein 90 in Breast Cancer Patients

pdf Download PDF
Research Article In-Press

Patterns of Bone Metastases in Cancer Patients Referred for Bone Scintigraphy in the Hail Region: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study

...
pdf Download PDF
Research Article In-Press

Prospective Evaluation of Laparoscopic D3 Right Hemicolectomy: A Single Center Experience of 142 Cases

...
pdf Download PDF
Research Article In-Press

Age-Independent Molecular Resistance Patterns in Tuberculosis Patients: A Cross-Sectional Analytical Study

...
pdf Download PDF
Copyright © Journal of Pioneering Medical Sciences until unless otherwise.